World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
18537
World Ranking
4894
National Ranking
2694

Daniel M. Landers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Landers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel M. Landers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Landers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel M. Landers is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their academic work is associated with this institution, contributing to its research environment and scholarly output.

There is no specific data available on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications related to Daniel M. Landers.

No detailed information is provided regarding their main fields of study, subfields of study, or main research topics. Likewise, no information about awards or recognitions has been recorded.

The absence of publication or citation records, co-author data, and research topics in the available source data limits a detailed overview of their research contributions. However, their connection to Arizona State University positions them within an established academic framework in the United States.

Best Publications

  • The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis.

    Deborah L. Feltz;Daniel M. Landers

  • A Meta-Analysis on the Anxiety-Reducing Effects of Acute and Chronic Exercise: Outcomes and Mechanisms

    Steven J. Petruzzello;Daniel M. Landers;Brad D. Hatfield;Karla A. Kubitz

  • The Influence of Physical Fitness and Exercise upon Cognitive Functioning: A Meta-Analysis

    Jennifer L. Etnier;Walter Salazar;Daniel M. Landers;Steven J. Petruzzello

  • A meta-regression to examine the relationship between aerobic fitness and cognitive performance.

    Jennifer L. Etnier;Priscilla M. Nowell;Daniel M. Landers;Benjamin A. Sibley

  • The anxiolytic effects of exercise: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and dose-response analysis.

    Bradley M. Wipfli;Chad D. Rethorst;Daniel M. Landers

  • The antidepressive effects of exercise: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Chad D. Rethorst;Bradley M. Wipfli;Daniel M. Landers

  • The Effect of Exercise on Clinical Depression and Depression Resulting from Mental Illness: A Meta-Analysis

    Lynette L. Craft;Daniel M. Landers

  • The Effects of Exercise on Mood in Older Adults: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Shawn M. Arent;Daniel M. Landers;Jennifer L. Etnier

  • Physical Activity and Mental Health

    Daniel M. Landers;Shawn M. Arent

  • A meta-analytic review of aerobic fitness and reactivity to psychosocial stressors

    Debra J. Crews;Daniel M. Landers

  • Enhancing Self-efficacy in High-avoidance Motor Tasks: A Comparison of Modeling Techniques

    Deborah L. Feltz;Daniel M. Landers;Ursula Raeder

  • Cognitive processes during self-paced motor performance: An electroencephalographic profile of skilled marksmen.

    Bradley D. Hatfield;Daniel M. Landers;William J. Ray

  • What is Missing in p < .05? Effect Size

    Jerry R. Thomas;Walter Salazar;Daniel M. Landers

  • The effects of acute and chronic exercise on sleep. A meta-analytic review.

    Karla A. Kubitz;Daniel M. Landers;Steven J. Petruzzello;Myungwoo Han

  • Goal Setting in Sport and Exercise: A Research Synthesis to Resolve the Controversy

    L. Blaine Kyllo;Daniel M. Landers

  • An examination of serotonin and psychological variables in the relationship between exercise and mental health.

    Brad Wipfli;D. Landers;C. Nagoshi;Shannon Ringenbach

  • Hemispheric asymmetry, cardiac response, and performance in elite archers.

    Walter Salazar;Daniel M. Landers;Steven J. Petruzzello;Myungwoo Han

  • Arousal, Anxiety, and Performance: A Reexamination of the Inverted-U Hypothesis

    Shawn M. Arent;Daniel M. Landers

  • The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers.

    Daniel M. Landers;Steven J. Petruzzello;Walter Salazar;Debra J. Crews

  • Aerobic physical activity effects on psychological well-being in low-income Hispanic children.

    Debra J. Crews;Marc R. Lochbaum;Daniel M. Landers

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Petruzzello
Steven J. Petruzzello University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jennifer L. Etnier
Jennifer L. Etnier University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Marc Lochbaum
Marc Lochbaum Vytautas Magnus University
Deborah L. Feltz
Deborah L. Feltz Michigan State University
Craig T. Nagoshi
Craig T. Nagoshi The University of Texas at Arlington
Bradley D. Hatfield
Bradley D. Hatfield University of Maryland, College Park
James S. Skinner
James S. Skinner Indiana University
Gershon Tenenbaum
Gershon Tenenbaum Reichman University
Hermona Soreq
Hermona Soreq Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Michael Bar-Eli
Michael Bar-Eli Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online has become an increasingly flexible option for students across the USA. Many institutions now offer both bachelor's and graduate programs that can be completed entirely online. As demand grows, students often look for specific features such as program duration, location, and overall workload to find the best fit for their personal goals and schedules.

For those seeking a smoother academic journey, the easiest online psychology degree programs in Wisconsin offer supportive coursework and accessible schedules. If accelerating your education is a priority, consider the fastest online psychology degree programs in Arizona or explore the fastest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Florida. Houston students can also benefit from accelerated online psychology bachelor's programs in Houston designed to help graduates enter the job market quickly.

By choosing the right online program, students can align their academic experience with their career aspirations—whether they aim to enter clinical roles, counseling, research, or related fields. Exploring these program options is the first step toward a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Landers

Recently Published Articles