World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Constanze I. Seidenbecher

Constanze I. Seidenbecher

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 48 6195 5707 520 493 116 8724

Constanze I. Seidenbecher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Constanze I. Seidenbecher between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Constanze I. Seidenbecher published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2024. 13 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2024. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1993 2025

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Constanze I. Seidenbecher: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 5
2000 1
2001 3
2002 5
2003 4
2004 1
2005 1
2006 6
2007 3
2008 6
2009 3
2010 4
2011 6
2012 5
2013 5
2014 8
2015 3
2016 3
2017 6
2018 1
2019 6
2020 6
2021 8
2022 5
2023 6
2024 9
2025 4
Total 131
Download as CSV

Constanze I. Seidenbecher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constanze I. Seidenbecher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 116 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 116
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Constanze I. Seidenbecher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constanze I. Seidenbecher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 48
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Constanze I. Seidenbecher is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The subfields that dominate their work include cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, neurology, and cell biology.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad range of areas within neuroscience and related disciplines. Key themes include neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, dementia and cognitive impairment research, proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research, functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, and neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

Seidenbecher has published extensively, with frequent appearances in several scientific journals and publication venues. Notable venues where their work appears include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Neural Transmission, Human Brain Mapping, European Journal of Neuroscience, and Matrix Biology.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Constanze I. Seidenbecher include:

  • Dopamine Receptor Activation Modulates the Integrity of the Perisynaptic Extracellular Matrix at Excitatory Synapses, 2020, Cells
  • A comprehensive score reflecting memory-related fMRI activations and deactivations as potential biomarker for neurocognitive aging, 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • Neurocan genome-wide psychiatric risk variant affects explicit memory performance and hippocampal function in healthy humans, 2020, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Learning in anticipation of reward and punishment: perspectives across the human lifespan, 2020, Neurobiology of Aging
  • Brain extracellular matrix: An upcoming target in neurological and psychiatric disorders, 2021, European Journal of Neuroscience

Collaboration has been a consistent aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including Björn H. Schott, Anni Richter, Gusalija Behnisch, Emrah Düzel, and Alexander Dityatev.

Best Publications

  • Brain extracellular matrix affects AMPA receptor lateral mobility and short-term synaptic plasticity

    Renato Frischknecht;Martin Heine;David Perrais;Constanze I. Seidenbecher

  • Mesolimbic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activations during Reward Anticipation Correlate with Reward-Related Ventral Striatal Dopamine Release

    Björn H Schott;Luciano Minuzzi;Ruth M Krebs;David Elmenhorst

  • Synaptopathies: synaptic dysfunction in neurological disorders - A review from students to students

    Katarzyna Lepeta;Mychael V. Lourenco;Barbara C. Schweitzer;Pamela V. Martino Adami

  • Postnatal development of perineuronal nets in wild-type mice and in a mutant deficient in tenascin-R.

    Gert Brückner;Jens Grosche;Sandra Schmidt;Wolfgang Härtig

  • Brevican-deficient mice display impaired hippocampal CA1 long-term potentiation but show no obvious deficits in learning and memory

    Cord Brakebusch;Constanze I. Seidenbecher;Fredrik Asztely;Uwe Rauch

  • Neurofascin assembles a specialized extracellular matrix at the axon initial segment

    Kristian L. Hedstrom;Xiaorong Xu;Yasuhiro Ogawa;Renato Frischknecht

  • Compartmentalization from the outside: the extracellular matrix and functional microdomains in the brain

    Alexander Dityatev;Constanze I. Seidenbecher;Melitta Schachner

  • The dopaminergic midbrain participates in human episodic memory formation: evidence from genetic imaging.

    Björn H. Schott;Constanze I. Seidenbecher;Daniela B. Fenker;Corinna J. Lauer

  • Proline-rich synapse-associated proteins ProSAP1 and ProSAP2 interact with synaptic proteins of the SAPAP/GKAP family.

    Tobias M. Boeckers;Carsten Winter;Karl-Heinz Smalla;Michael R. Kreutz

  • Contributions of astrocytes to synapse formation and maturation - Potential functions of the perisynaptic extracellular matrix.

    Andreas Faissner;Martin Pyka;Maren Geissler;Thomas Sobik

  • Neurocan is dispensable for brain development

    Xiao-Hong Zhou;Cord Brakebusch;Henry Matthies;Toshitaka Oohashi

  • Ageing and early-stage Parkinson's disease affect separable neural mechanisms of mesolimbic reward processing

    Björn H Schott;Ludwig Niehaus;Bianca C Wittmann;Hartmut Schütze

  • Caldendrin–Jacob: A Protein Liaison That Couples NMDA Receptor Signalling to the Nucleus

    Daniela C Dieterich;Anna Karpova;Marina Mikhaylova;Irina Zdobnova

  • Three mechanisms assemble central nervous system nodes of Ranvier.

    Keiichiro Susuki;Kae Jiun Chang;Daniel R. Zollinger;Yanhong Liu

  • The energetic brain – A review from students to students

    Melina Paula Bordone;Mootaz M Salman;Haley E Titus;Elham Amini

  • Brevican, a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan of rat brain, occurs as secreted and cell surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored isoforms.

    Constanze I. Seidenbecher;Karin Richter;Uwe Rauch;Reinhard Fässler

  • A methyl jasmonate-induced shift in the length of the 5' untranslated region impairs translation of the plastid rbcL transcript in barley.

    Steffen Reinbothe;Christiane Reinbothe;C. Heintzen;C. Seidenbecher

  • Apoptotic versus necrotic characteristics of retinal ganglion cell death after partial optic nerve injury.

    Annett Bien;Constanze I. Seidenbecher;Tobias M. Böckers;Bernhard A. Sabel

  • Rapamycin-sensitive signalling in long-term consolidation of auditory cortex-dependent memory.

    Wolfgang Tischmeyer;Horst Schicknick;Michaela Kraus;Constanze I. Seidenbecher

  • Brevican-containing perineuronal nets of extracellular matrix in dissociated hippocampal primary cultures.

    Nora John;Hans Krügel;Renato Frischknecht;Karl-Heinz Smalla

  • Brevican: A key proteoglycan in the perisynaptic extracellular matrix of the brain

    Renato Frischknecht;Constanze I. Seidenbecher

Frequent Co-Authors

Eckart D. Gundelfinger
Eckart D. Gundelfinger Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Björn H. Schott
Björn H. Schott University of Göttingen
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Michael R. Kreutz
Michael R. Kreutz Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Torsten Wüstenberg
Torsten Wüstenberg Heidelberg University
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Marc Guitart-Masip
Marc Guitart-Masip Karolinska Institute
Craig C. Garner
Craig C. Garner Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Alexander Dityatev
Alexander Dityatev German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Tobias M. Boeckers
Tobias M. Boeckers University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, a wide variety of online certification programs can help you build essential skills and prepare for in-demand careers. These certifications can be valuable additions to traditional neuroscience degrees, offering flexibility for working professionals or those seeking new specializations.

For students concerned about time and workload, it's common to explore what is the easiest degree to get online. Choosing a manageable path does not mean sacrificing quality—many entry-level degrees can lay the foundation for future study or stepped career progression in neuroscience and related fields.

Many future neuroscience professionals also consider mental health and behavioral science. Options like affordable msw programs online are excellent routes for those interested in social work or therapy. Likewise, specialized tracks such as bcba online programs (for behavior analysis) can lead to rewarding roles supporting individuals with neurological or developmental challenges.

Online neuroscience degrees and related credentials offer flexibility, affordability, and diverse career pathways—making it easier than ever to tailor your education to your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Constanze I. Seidenbecher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles