Cinda J. Helke

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

• Neuron
• Central nervous system
• Internal medicine

Cinda J. Helke focuses on Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Substance P, Neuroscience and Spinal cord. Cinda J. Helke combines subjects such as Neuropeptide and Calcitonin gene-related peptide with her study of Endocrinology. Her primary area of study in Internal medicine is in the field of Medulla.

Her Substance P research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Capsaicin, Raphe nuclei and Dorsal raphe nucleus. Her Neuroscience research includes elements of Peripheral and In vitro. Cinda J. Helke interconnects Medulla oblongata and Anatomy in the investigation of issues within Spinal cord.

Her most cited work include:

• Substance P neurons project from the ventral medulla to the intermediolateral cell column and ventral horn in the rat (189 citations)
• Immunohistochemical study of neuropeptides in vagal and glossopharyngeal afferent neurons in the rat (174 citations)
• Serotonin- and substance P-containing projections to the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat. (163 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Substance P, Nodose Ganglion and Neuroscience. Her Internal medicine study focuses mostly on Neuropeptide, Medulla, Agonist, Serotonin and Medulla oblongata. Her study focuses on the intersection of Endocrinology and fields such as Anesthesia with connections in the field of Mean arterial pressure.

Her study in Substance P is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Nucleus, Central nervous system, Anatomy and Spinal cord. Her study in the fields of Axoplasmic transport under the domain of Anatomy overlaps with other disciplines such as Dorsal motor nucleus. Her work on Neurotransmitter and Neurochemical as part of general Neuroscience study is frequently linked to Efferent and Cellular localization, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

She most often published in these fields:

• Internal medicine (63.41%)
• Endocrinology (63.41%)
• Substance P (45.12%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 1998-2004)?

• Internal medicine (63.41%)
• Endocrinology (63.41%)
• Neurotrophin (9.76%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Neurotrophin, Nodose Ganglion and Nerve growth factor. Her studies deal with areas such as Diabetes mellitus and Streptozotocin as well as Internal medicine. Her studies examine the connections between Neurotrophin and genetics, as well as such issues in Neuroscience, with regards to Low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor and Trk receptor.

While working in this field, Cinda J. Helke studies both Nodose Ganglion and Calcitonin gene-related peptide. Her research in Calcitonin gene-related peptide intersects with topics in Vasoactive intestinal peptide, Sensory neuron and Retrograde tracing. Her Baroreceptor study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Central nervous system, Neurotransmitter, Substance P and Excitatory postsynaptic potential.

Between 1998 and 2004, her most popular works were:

• Streptozotocin-induced diabetes causes metabolic changes and alterations in neurotrophin content and retrograde transport in the cervical vagus nerve. (51 citations)
• Substance P in the baroreceptor reflex: 25 years. (35 citations)
• Abnormal PI3 kinase/Akt signal pathway in vagal afferent neurons and vagus nerve of streptozotocin-diabetic rats. (35 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

• Neuron
• Central nervous system
• Biochemistry

Her primary scientific interests are in Internal medicine, Neurotrophin, Nerve growth factor, Endocrinology and Cervical Nerve. Her research in the fields of Autonomic nerve overlaps with other disciplines such as Protein kinase B. Cervical Nerve is connected with Streptozotocin, Diabetic neuropathy, Neurotrophin-3 and Polyneuropathy in her research.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.