World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
59
Citations
15264
World Ranking
1551
National Ranking
743

Charles W. Lidz publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Lidz sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 198 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charles W. Lidz D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Lidz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles W. Lidz is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily contributes to the field of medicine with specific focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, statistics, probability and uncertainty, speech and hearing, and pediatrics, perinatology and child health.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Recent publications by Charles W. Lidz include the following papers:

  • Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems, 2020, AJOB Empirical Bioethics
  • When IRBs Say No to Participating in Research about Single IRBs, 2020, Ethics & Human Research
  • Patterns of Psychotherapy Attendance in Emerging and Mature Adults, 2021, University of Massachusetts (UMass) Chan Medical School

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Charles W. Lidz are:

  • Robert Klitzman
  • Paul S. Appelbaum
  • Alexandra Murray
  • Ekaterina Pivovarova
  • Deborah F. Stiles

The scientist publishes in venues such as:

  • Ethics & Human Research
  • AJOB Empirical Bioethics
  • University of Massachusetts (UMass) Chan Medical School

Best Publications

  • False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception

    Paul S. Appelbaum;Loren H. Roth;Charles W. Lidz;Paul Benson

  • Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice

    Paul S. Appelbaum;Charles W. Lidz;Alan Meisel

  • The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research

    Paul S. Appelbaum;Loren H. Roth;Charles W. Lidz

  • Tests of competency to consent to treatment.

    Loren H. Roth;Alan Meisel;Charles W. Lidz

  • The Accuracy of Predictions of Violence to Others

    Charles W. Lidz;Edward P. Mulvey;William Gardner

  • Clinical Trials and Medical Care: Defining the Therapeutic Misconception

    Gail E Henderson;Larry R Churchill;Arlene M Davis;Michele M Easter

  • Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions for coercion during mental hospital admission

    William Gardner;Steven K. Hoge;Nancy Bennett;M.P.H. Loren H. Roth M.D.

  • Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors.

    Paul S. Appelbaum;Charles W. Lidz;Thomas Grisso

  • Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.

    Charles W Lidz;Paul S Appelbaum;Thomas Grisso;Michelle Renaud

  • Perceived Coercion in Mental Hospital Admission: Pressures and Process

    Charles W. Lidz;Steven K. Hoge;William Gardner;Nancy S. Bennett

  • Coercion and commitment: understanding involuntary mental hospital admission.

    John Monahan;Steven K. Hoge;Charles W. Lidz;Loren H. Roth

  • The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions.

    Charles W. Lidz;Paul S. Appelbaum

  • Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent.

    Alan Meisel;Loren H. Roth;Charles W. Lidz

  • Two models of implementing informed consent

    Charles W. Lidz;Paul S. Appelbaum;Alan Meisel

  • Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence of patients with mental illnesses.

    William Gardner;Charles W. Lidz;Edward P. Mulvey;Esther C. Shaw

  • Perceptions of coercion in the admission of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric patients

    Steven K. Hoge;Charles W. Lidz;Marlene M. Eisenberg;William Gardner

  • A Comparison of Actuarial Methods for Identifying Repetitively Violent Patients with Mental Illnesses

    William Gardner;Charles W. Lidz;Edward P. Mulvey;Esther C. Shaw

  • Patients' revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalization.

    William Gardner;Charles W. Lidz;Steven K. Hoge;John Monahan

  • Psychiatric symptoms and community violence among high-risk patients: A test of the relationship at the weekly level.

    Jennifer L. Skeem;Carol A. Schubert;Candice L. Odgers;Edward P. Mulvey

  • Informed Consent: A Study of Decisionmaking in Psychiatry

    Charles W. Lidz;Alan Meisel;Eviatar Zerubavel;Mary Carter

  • The Therapeutic Misconception

    Paul S. Appelbaum;Charles W. Lidz

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul S. Appelbaum
Paul S. Appelbaum Columbia University
Edward P. Mulvey
Edward P. Mulvey University of Pittsburgh
John Monahan
John Monahan University of Virginia
Robert M. Arnold
Robert M. Arnold Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jennifer L. Skeem
Jennifer L. Skeem University of California, Berkeley
Robert Klitzman
Robert Klitzman Columbia University
Carol A. Schubert
Carol A. Schubert University of Pittsburgh
Thomas Grisso
Thomas Grisso University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
William H. Fisher
William H. Fisher University of Massachusetts Lowell
Candice L. Odgers
Candice L. Odgers University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, a variety of online degree options can help you launch or advance your career. Many programs now offer accelerated paths and flexible formats, making them accessible for working professionals or those looking to fast-track their studies.

If you’re passionate about making a difference in communities, consider a 1 year online master's in social work. This program prepares you for leadership roles in social work with a faster completion timeline. Exploring human behavior and the mind? An accelerated bachelor's in psychology can provide foundational skills for counseling, research, or human resources.

Those interested in direct client care may pursue cacrep accredited online counseling programs, which are widely recognized and can lead directly to licensure. Alternatively, specialize in family systems and therapy through online mft programs accredited by respected bodies, opening doors to clinical practice with couples and families.

These flexible pathways allow you to align your studies with your career goals while meeting today’s workforce demands in the social sciences field.

Best Scientists Citing Charles W. Lidz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles