World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carl L. von Baeyer

Carl L. von Baeyer

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
17908
World Ranking
5541
National Ranking
375

Carl L. von Baeyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl L. von Baeyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Carl L. von Baeyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl L. von Baeyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carl L. von Baeyer is affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, focusing their research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses subfields such as Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, as well as Pharmacology.

Their main research topics include pediatric pain management techniques, infant development and preterm care, and musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation. These areas reflect an interest in both clinical approaches and developmental aspects of child health.

Among their recent scholarly contributions is the paper titled "Ability of 3- to 5-year-old children to use simplified self-report measures of pain intensity," published in 2020 in the Journal of Child Health Care. This work addresses methodologies for pain assessment in young children, illustrating an overlap of pediatrics and pain management research themes.

  • Ability of 3- to 5-year-old children to use simplified self-report measures of pain intensity, 2020, Journal of Child Health Care

Their frequent coauthors include researchers such as Tiina Jaaniste, Ashleigh Burgess, Mathushinee Mohanachandran, and G. David Champion. These collaborations indicate interdisciplinary connections supporting research on child health and pain assessment.

  • Tiina Jaaniste
  • Ashleigh Burgess
  • Mathushinee Mohanachandran
  • G. David Champion

Their work has appeared predominantly in the Journal of Child Health Care, suggesting a consistent venue aligned with the topics of child health and medical care.

  • Journal of Child Health Care

Best Publications

  • The attributional Style Questionnaire

    Christopher Peterson;Amy Semmel;Carl L. von Baeyer;Lyn Y. Abramson

  • The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement.

    Carrie L. Hicks;Carl L. von Baeyer;Pamela A. Spafford;Inez van Korlaar

  • Depressive attributional style.

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Lyn Y. Abramson;Amy Semmel;Carl von Baeyer

  • Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations

    Patrick J. McGrath;Gary A. Walco;Dennis C. Turk;Robert H. Dworkin

  • Systematic review of observational (behavioral) measures of pain for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years.

    Carl L. von Baeyer;Lara J. Spagrud

  • A Systematic Review of Faces Scales for the Self-report of Pain Intensity in Children

    Deborah Tomlinson;Carl L von Baeyer;Jennifer N Stinson;Lillian Sung

  • Three new datasets supporting use of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) for children's self-reports of pain intensity.

    Carl L. von Baeyer;Lara J. Spagrud;Julia C. McCormick;Eugene Choo

  • Children’s self-reports of pain intensity: Scale selection, limitations and interpretation

    Carl L von Baeyer

  • Guidelines for the cold pressor task as an experimental pain stimulus for use with children

    Carl L. von Baeyer;Tiina Piira;Christine T. Chambers;Manuela Trapanotto

  • Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

    Elena Castarlenas;Mark P Jensen;Carl L von Baeyer;Jordi Miró

  • Children's memory for pain: overview and implications for practice.

    Carl L. von Baeyer;Tammy A. Marche;Elizabete M. Rocha;Karen Salmon

  • Unravelling age effects and sex differences in needle pain: ratings of sensory intensity and unpleasantness of venipuncture pain by children and their parents.

    Belinda Goodenough;Belinda Goodenough;Warwick Thomas;G David Champion;David Perrott

  • Online Psychological Treatment for Pediatric Recurrent Pain: A Randomized Evaluation

    Carrie L. Hicks;Carl L. von Baeyer;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Providing Children With Information About Forthcoming Medical Procedures: A Review and Synthesis

    Tiina Jaaniste;Brett Hayes;Carl L. von Baeyer

  • Predictors of a positive childbirth experience.

    B A Kathryn Crowe;Carl von Baeyer

  • Pain in children with cerebral palsy: common triggers and expressive behaviors

    Kellie L Hadden;Carl L von Baeyer

  • Children's self-report of pain intensity: what we know, where we are headed

    Carl L von Baeyer

  • Impression Management in the Job Interview When the Female Applicant Meets the Male (Chauvinist) Interviewer

    Carl L. Von Baeyer;Debbie L. Sherk;Mark P. Zanna

  • An integration of vibration and cold relieves venipuncture pain in a pediatric emergency department.

    Amy L. Baxter;Lindsey L. Cohen;Heather L. McElvery;Mona Louise Lawson

  • Validation of self-report pain scales in children

    Daniel S. Tsze;Carl L. von Baeyer;Blake Bulloch;Peter S. Dayan

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine T. Chambers
Christine T. Chambers Dalhousie University
Patrick J. McGrath
Patrick J. McGrath Columbia University
Kenneth D. Craig
Kenneth D. Craig University of British Columbia
Melanie Noel
Melanie Noel University of Calgary
Bonnie Stevens
Bonnie Stevens University of Toronto
Rebecca Pillai Riddell
Rebecca Pillai Riddell York University
Lynn S. Walker
Lynn S. Walker Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lyn Y. Abramson
Lyn Y. Abramson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Karen Salmon
Karen Salmon Victoria University of Wellington
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse online program options and a range of career pathways. Students often choose to specialize, such as becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC) or therapist, but requirements can vary across states and cities.

Education is the essential starting point. For example, you can explore Greensboro licensed therapist education requirements to learn about foundational degrees and state-specific coursework. As each location has its exact standards, understanding how to become a licensed therapist in Henderson or researching how to become a licensed therapist in Honolulu can help prospective professionals plan their academic journey.

Online degrees can provide flexibility, but students should always ensure their chosen program meets local licensure requirements. For those aiming to practice in Texas, investigating how to become a licensed therapist in Houston is essential. With the right accredited degree and a thorough understanding of local regulations, graduates can confidently pursue rewarding careers in counseling and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Carl L. von Baeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles