World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 78 620 586 24 22 350 19175

C. Jim Lim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by C. Jim Lim between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. C. Jim Lim published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2008. 3 of the 370 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2008. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1971 2025

370 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
C. Jim Lim: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 3
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 8
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 10
1992 5
1993 3
1994 6
1995 5
1996 5
1997 6
1998 3
1999 3
2000 6
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 9
2005 9
2006 7
2007 16
2008 28
2009 19
2010 16
2011 19
2012 13
2013 19
2014 20
2015 23
2016 18
2017 14
2018 8
2019 11
2020 13
2021 8
2022 3
2023 3
2024 1
2025 2
Total 370
Download as CSV

C. Jim Lim publications per year - data summary

  • C. Jim Lim, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of British Columbia, has 370 publications recorded across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1971 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1971, 1975, 1976, 1978 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 55 years in the span carry no publications at all (1972, 1973, 1977, 1979 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.0 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 17 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1971-1989: 24 publications (1.3 per year); 1990-2008: 136 publications (7.2 per year); 2009-2025: 210 publications (12.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

C. Jim Lim publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Jim Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 348–357 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 350 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131 350
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

C. Jim Lim publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • C. Jim Lim, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of British Columbia, records 350 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than C. Jim Lim, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and C. Jim Lim ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

C. Jim Lim D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Jim Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46 78
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

C. Jim Lim D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • C. Jim Lim, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of British Columbia, records 78 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than C. Jim Lim, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and C. Jim Lim ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

C. Jim Lim is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has an extensive research portfolio primarily situated within the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science. Their work is concentrated on specialized areas such as Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computational Mechanics, and Ocean Engineering.

The scientist's research prominently addresses topics including Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes, Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes, Municipal Solid Waste Management, Granular Flow and Fluidized Beds, Recycling and Waste Management Techniques, Iron and Steelmaking Processes, and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by C. Jim Lim are:

  • Market prospects for biochar production and application in California, 2021, Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
  • Pelletization properties of refuse-derived fuel - Effects of particle size and moisture content, 2020, Fuel Processing Technology
  • Pelletization of Refuse-Derived Fuel with Varying Compositions of Plastic, Paper, Organic and Wood, 2020, Sustainability
  • Oxidative torrefaction for cleaner utilization of biomass for soil amendment, 2020, Cleaner Engineering and Technology
  • Effect of calcination/carbonation and oxidation/reduction on attrition of binary solid species in sorption-enhanced chemical looping reforming, 2020, Fuel

Frequent collaborators of C. Jim Lim include Sonal K. Thengane, Kevin S. Kung, Jun Young Kim, Naoko Ellis, and John R. Grace, with each having coauthored multiple works alongside them.

The most common publication venues for their research are:

  • Energy Conversion and Management (3 publications)
  • Biomass and Bioenergy (3 publications)
  • Fuel Processing Technology (2 publications)
  • Fuel (2 publications)
  • Chemical Engineering Journal (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Biomass gasification in a circulating fluidized bed

    X.T. Li;J.R. Grace;C.J. Lim;A.P. Watkinson

  • Equilibrium modeling of gasification: a free energy minimization approach and its application to a circulating fluidized bed coal gasifier

    X Li;J.R Grace;A.P Watkinson;C.J Lim

  • Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as CO2-acceptor

    K. Johnsen;H.J. Ryu;J.R. Grace;C.J. Lim

  • The effect of CaO sintering on cyclic CO2 capture in energy systems

    P. Sun;J. R. Grace;C. J. Lim;E. J. Anthony

  • Determination of intrinsic rate constants of the CaO–CO2 reaction

    Ping Sun;John R. Grace;C. Jim Lim;Edward J. Anthony

  • Pelletization of torrefied sawdust and properties of torrefied pellets

    Hui Li;Xinhua Liu;Xinhua Liu;Robert Legros;Robert Legros;Xiaotao T. Bi

  • Fuel characterization and co-pyrolysis kinetics of biomass and fossil fuels

    Mohammad S. Masnadi;Rozita Habibi;Jan Kopyscinski;Josephine M. Hill

  • Particle velocity profiles and solid flow patterns in spouted beds

    Y.-L. He;S.-Z. Qin;S.-Z. Qin;C. J. Lim;J. R. Grace

  • Oxidative torrefaction of biomass residues and densification of torrefied sawdust to pellets.

    Congwei Wang;Jianghong Peng;Hui Li;Xiaotao T. Bi

  • From fossil fuels towards renewables: Inhibitory and catalytic effects on carbon thermochemical conversion during co-gasification of biomass with fossil fuels

    Mohammad S. Masnadi;John R. Grace;Xiaotao T. Bi;C. Jim Lim

  • CO2 absorption by NaOH, monoethanolamine and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solutions in a packed column

    Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul;Axel Meisen;C.Jim Lim

  • Bulk Density of Wet and Dry Wheat Straw and Switchgrass Particles

    P. S. Lam;S. Sokhansanj;X. Bi;C. J. Lim

  • Solubility of CO2 in 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solutions

    Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul;Axel Meisen;Choon Jim Lim

  • Torrefaction and densification of different species of softwood residues

    J.H. Peng;X.T. Bi;S. Sokhansanj;S. Sokhansanj;C.J. Lim

  • Removal of CO2 by Calcium-Based Sorbents in the Presence of SO2

    Ping Sun;John R. Grace;C. Jim Lim;Edward J. Anthony

  • Overview and some issues related to co-firing biomass and coal

    Jianjun Dai;Shahab Sokhansanj;John R. Grace;Xiaotao Bi

  • Long-Term Calcination/Carbonation Cycling and Thermal Pretreatment for CO2 Capture by Limestone and Dolomite

    Zhongxiang Chen;Hoon Sub Song;Miguel Portillo;C. Jim Lim

  • Study on Density, Hardness, and Moisture Uptake of Torrefied Wood Pellets

    J. H. Peng;H. T. Bi;C. J. Lim;S. Sokhansanj;S. Sokhansanj

  • The fluidized-bed membrane reactor for steam methane reforming: model verification and parametric study

    A.M. Adris;C.J. Lim;J.R. Grace

  • Measurements of voidage profiles in spouted beds

    Y.-L. He;C. J. Lim;J. R. Grace;J.-X. Zhu

  • Torrefaction of sawdust in a fluidized bed reactor.

    Hui Li;Xinhua Liu;Xinhua Liu;Robert Legros;Robert Legros;Xiaotao T. Bi

  • Investigation of Attempts to Improve Cyclic CO2 Capture by Sorbent Hydration and Modification

    Ping Sun;John R. Grace;C. Jim Lim;Edward J. Anthony

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Grace
John R. Grace University of British Columbia
Shahab Sokhansanj
Shahab Sokhansanj University of British Columbia
Xiaotao Bi
Xiaotao Bi University of British Columbia
Said S.E.H. Elnashaie
Said S.E.H. Elnashaie University of British Columbia
Naoko Ellis
Naoko Ellis University of British Columbia
Edward J. Anthony
Edward J. Anthony Cranfield University
Anthony To-Ming Lau
Anthony To-Ming Lau University of Alberta
Norman Epstein
Norman Epstein University of British Columbia
Atsushi Tsutsumi
Atsushi Tsutsumi University of Tokyo
Qiang Hu
Qiang Hu Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA offers flexible pathways to boost your career. For those seeking rapid advancement, there are 6 month masters degree programs that allow you to quickly gain advanced knowledge and credentials.

If you prefer shorter commitments, consider 6-month certificate programs that pay well. These intensive programs focus on high-demand skills, preparing you for well-paying positions in a fraction of the time of a traditional degree.

Online education is especially suited for those balancing work or family. Numerous options exist, including tailored online degrees for single moms. These programs offer flexibility, allowing you to study at your own pace while managing other responsibilities.

For those with limited time, 6 week college courses offer a way to complete specific subjects or skillsets rapidly. These accelerated courses are ideal for professionals aiming to upskill or pivot their careers without a long-term commitment.

By choosing the right online pathway, you can advance your career in engineering and technology—no matter your schedule or personal situation.

Best Scientists Citing C. Jim Lim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles