World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
8761
World Ranking
6192
National Ranking
519

Burkhard Pleger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burkhard Pleger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 186 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Burkhard Pleger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burkhard Pleger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Burkhard Pleger is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany, where their research focuses on neuroscience and medicine. Their work encompasses multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, molecular biology, sensory systems, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their publication record features contributions to a range of neuroscience topics such as neural dynamics and brain function, functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, memory and neural mechanisms, olfactory and sensory function studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Pleger has authored numerous papers, some recent and notable examples include:

  • A Systematic Review of Obesity and Binge Eating Associated Impairment of the Cognitive Inhibition System, 2021, Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Thalamic regulation of frontal interactions in human cognitive flexibility, 2022, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Human orbitofrontal cortex signals decision outcomes to sensory cortex during behavioral adaptations, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Encoding schemes in somatosensation: From micro- to meta-topography, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Stroke-derived neutrophils demonstrate higher formation potential and impaired resolution of CD66b + driven neutrophil extracellular traps, 2022, BMC Neurology

Frequent coauthors in Pleger's research include:

  • Bin Wang
  • Michael M. Halassa
  • Elodie Saruco
  • Bogdan Pintea
  • Kathrin Ohla

Pleger's work has been published in various scientific venues, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Nature Communications
  • BMC Neurology
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Eigenvector centrality mapping for analyzing connectivity patterns in fMRI data of the human brain.

    Gabriele Lohmann;Daniel S. Margulies;Annette Horstmann;Burkhard Pleger

  • Sensorimotor Returning in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Parallels Pain Reduction

    Burkhard Pleger;Martin Tegenthoff;Patrick Ragert;Ann-Freya Förster

  • Bilateral motor cortex disinhibition in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I of the hand.

    P. Schwenkreis;F. Janssen;O. Rommel;B. Pleger

  • Patterns of cortical reorganization parallel impaired tactile discrimination and pain intensity in complex regional pain syndrome

    Burkhard Pleger;Patrick Ragert;Peter Schwenkreis;Ann-Freya Förster

  • Anterolateral Prefrontal Cortex Mediates the Analgesic Effect of Expected and Perceived Control over Pain

    Katja Wiech;Raffael Kalisch;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Burkhard Pleger

  • Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization.

    Hubert R. Dinse;Patrick Ragert;Burkhard Pleger;Peter Schwenkreis

  • Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.

    Burkhard Pleger;Ann Freya Foerster;Patrick Ragert;Hubert R Dinse

  • Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement.

    Burkhard Pleger;Hubert R. Dinse;Patrick Ragert;Peter Schwenkreis

  • Neural correlates of the volitional regulation of the desire for food

    Maurice Hollmann;Lydia Hellrung;Burkhard Pleger;Haiko Schlögl

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex attenuates pain perception in complex regional pain syndrome type I.

    Burkhard Pleger;Frank Janssen;Peter Schwenkreis;Birgit Völker

  • Improvement of Tactile Discrimination Performance and Enlargement of Cortical Somatosensory Maps after 5 Hz rTMS

    Martin Tegenthoff;Patrick Ragert;Burkhard Pleger;Peter Schwenkreis

  • Mean sustained pain levels are linked to hemispherical side-to-side differences of primary somatosensory cortex in the complex regional pain syndrome I.

    Burkhard Pleger;Martin Tegenthoff;Peter Schwenkreis;Frank Janssen

  • Obesity-Related Differences between Women and Men in Brain Structure and Goal-Directed Behavior

    Annette Horstmann;Franziska P. Busse;David Mathar;Karsten Müller

  • Immobilization impairs tactile perception and shrinks somatosensory cortical maps.

    Silke Lissek;Claudia Wilimzig;Claudia Wilimzig;Philipp Stude;Burkhard Pleger;Burkhard Pleger

  • Sex-dependent influences of obesity on cerebral white matter investigated by diffusion-tensor imaging

    Karsten Mueller;Alfred Anwander;Harald E. Möller;Annette Horstmann

  • Blocking Central Opiate Function Modulates Hedonic Impact and Anterior Cingulate Response to Rewards and Losses

    Predrag Petrovic;Burkhard Pleger;Ben Seymour;Stefan Klöppel

  • Neural Coding of Tactile Decisions in the Human Prefrontal Cortex

    Burkhard Pleger;Christian C. Ruff;Felix Blankenburg;Sven Bestmann

  • Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Verbal Working Memory

    Andreas Boehringer;Katja Macher;Juergen Dukart;Juergen Dukart;Arno Villringer;Arno Villringer;Arno Villringer

  • Reward facilitates tactile judgments and modulates hemodynamic responses in human primary somatosensory cortex

    B Pleger;F Blankenburg;C Ruff;J Driver

  • Influence of Dopaminergically Mediated Reward on Somatosensory Decision-Making

    Burkhard Pleger;Burkhard Pleger;Christian C. Ruff;Christian C. Ruff;Christian C. Ruff;Felix Blankenburg;Felix Blankenburg;Felix Blankenburg;Stefan Klöppel;Stefan Klöppel

Frequent Co-Authors

Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Annette Horstmann
Annette Horstmann University of Helsinki
Martin Tegenthoff
Martin Tegenthoff Ruhr University Bochum
Peter Schwenkreis
Peter Schwenkreis Ruhr University Bochum
Hubert R. Dinse
Hubert R. Dinse Ruhr University Bochum
Patrick Ragert
Patrick Ragert Leipzig University
Jane Neumann
Jane Neumann Max Planck Society
Karsten Mueller
Karsten Mueller Max Planck Society
Michael Stumvoll
Michael Stumvoll Leipzig University
Matthias L. Schroeter
Matthias L. Schroeter Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience, there are a variety of online degree options that can broaden career prospects in mental health, counseling, and psychology. Online education offers flexibility and accessibility, allowing you to balance studies with other commitments.

Many pursue cacrep accredited online counseling programs for a recognized path toward licensing and practice as a professional counselor. These programs align with rigorous industry standards, making graduates well-prepared for clinical roles.

An online counseling degree may suit those aiming for broader counseling careers or school-based counseling. For those interested in family systems and relationships, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited lead to specialized licensure and practice settings.

If research or advanced psychological science interests you, consider masters programs in psychology. These offer a deep dive into behavioral science with potential career options in research, education, healthcare, and beyond.

Each of these pathways can complement a neuroscience background, opening doors to rewarding roles in mental health, research, and client care.

Best Scientists Citing Burkhard Pleger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles