World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
17430
World Ranking
15922
National Ranking
243

Bengt Oxelman publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bengt Oxelman sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bengt Oxelman D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bengt Oxelman sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bengt Oxelman is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Their research activity spans multiple areas within agricultural and biological sciences as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist's work is reflected in numerous publications focused on evolutionary biology, plant science, and genetic studies.

Oxelman's primary fields of study include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields of interest encompass:

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

The scientist's main topics of work feature:

  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
  • Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Bengt Oxelman include:

  • A Guide to Carrying Out a Phylogenomic Target Sequence Capture Project, 2020, Frontiers in Genetics
  • A new taxonomic backbone for the infrageneric classification of the species-rich genus Silene (Caryophyllaceae), 2020, Taxon
  • Multiple species delimitation approaches applied to the avian lark genus Alaudala, 2020, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • Phylogeny and species delimitation in Silene sect. Arenosae (Caryophyllaceae): a new section, 2020, PhytoKeys
  • Biogeographic origins of southern African Silene (Caryophyllaceae), 2021, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Oxelman include:

  • Farzaneh Jafari
  • Christine D. Bacon
  • Shahin Zarré
  • Frida Eggens
  • Anne-Sophie Quatela

Bengt Oxelman publishes regularly in specific scientific journals with a notable presence in:

  • Taxon
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • PhytoKeys
  • Data in Brief
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Improvements to resampling measures of group support

    Pablo Augusto Goloboff;James Farris;Mari Kallersjo;Bengt Oxelman

  • Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics.

    Per Erixon;Bodil Svennblad;T. O. M. Britton;Bengt Oxelman

  • Chloroplastrps16 intron phylogeny of the tribeSileneae (Caryophyllaceae)

    Bengt Oxelman;Magnus Lidén;Daniel Berglund

  • Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies.

    Fredrik Pleijel;U Jondelius;Erika Norlinder;Arne Nygren

  • A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales

    Patricia Hernández-Ledesma;Walter G. Berendsohn;Thomas Borsch;Sabine Von Mering

  • Piecing together the "new" Plantaginaceae.

    Dirk Albach;Heidi Meudt;Bengt Oxelman

  • Further disintegration of Scrophulariaceae

    Bengt Oxelman;Per Kornhall;Richard G. Olmstead;Birgitta Bremer

  • More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny--case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae).

    Birgitta Bremer;Robert K. Jansen;Bengt Oxelman;Maria Backlund

  • Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences

    Magnus Popp;Bengt Oxelman

  • DISSECT: an assignment-free Bayesian discovery method for species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent

    Graham Jones;Zeynep Aydin;Bengt Oxelman

  • Erratum to: Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial substitution rate variation in the angiosperm tribe Sileneae

    Daniel B Sloan;Bengt Oxelman;Anja Rautenberg;Douglas R Taylor

  • Generic boundaries in the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from nuclear rDNA sequences

    Bengt Oxelman;Magnus Lidén

  • Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s. l. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data.

    Bengt Oxelman;Maria Backlund;Birgitta Bremer

  • Whole-Gene Positive Selection, Elevated Synonymous Substitution Rates, Duplication, and Indel Evolution of the Chloroplast clpP1 Gene

    Per Erixon;Bengt Oxelman;Bengt Oxelman

  • Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on NDHF and RBCL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae.

    Maria Backlund;Bengt Oxelman;Birgitta Bremer

  • Origin and evolution of a circumpolar polyploid species complex in Silene (Caryophyllaceae) inferred from low copy nuclear rna polymerase introns, rDNA, and chloroplast DNA

    Magnus Popp;Magnus Popp;Per Erixon;Frida Eggens;Bengt Oxelman

  • Hybrid Origins and Homoploid Reticulate Evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)—A Multigene Phylogenetic Approach with Relative Dating

    Božo Frajman;Božo Frajman;Frida Eggens;Bengt Oxelman;Bengt Oxelman

  • A revised generic classification of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae)

    Magnus Lidén;Magnus Popp;Bengt Oxelman

  • Reticulate phylogenetics and phytogeographical structure of Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences

    Božo Frajman;Bengt Oxelman

  • Inferring Species Networks from Gene Trees in High-polyploid North American and Hawaiian Violets (Viola, Violaceae)

    Thomas Marcussen;Kjetill S. Jakobsen;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Danihelka;Harvey E. Ballard

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexandre Antonelli
Alexandre Antonelli University of Gothenburg
Birgitta Bremer
Birgitta Bremer Stockholm University
Honor C. Prentice
Honor C. Prentice Lund University
Tom Britton
Tom Britton Stockholm University
Boris Vyskot
Boris Vyskot Czech Academy of Sciences
Daniel B. Sloan
Daniel B. Sloan Colorado State University
Vincent Moulton
Vincent Moulton University of East Anglia
Fabien L. Condamine
Fabien L. Condamine University of Montpellier
Kjetill S. Jakobsen
Kjetill S. Jakobsen University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Biology and Biochemistry majors have a diverse range of career options—many of which can start with flexible online study programs. Students interested in healthcare administration may want to know is medical billing and coding worth it, since these roles offer remote work options and strong job growth, but come with their own training and daily challenges.

Those looking to expand into data and management roles can explore health information management schools online, which prepare graduates for positions overseeing medical records and patient data security.

If nutrition and wellness is your passion, pursuing an online nutrition masters can open doors in clinical practice, food industry leadership, or public health education.

For students drawn to patient care and diagnostic technology, ultrasound tech school online offers a pathway to a hands-on medical imaging career without needing to attend campus full time.

Each of these online degrees can complement a background in Biology or Biochemistry, helping you advance in both clinical and non-clinical healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Bengt Oxelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles