World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
15016
World Ranking
1802
National Ranking
658

Barry F. Sherr publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry F. Sherr sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Barry F. Sherr D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry F. Sherr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barry F. Sherr was affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States during their career.

Their research profile includes collaborations, publications, and contributions, though specific details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, main research topics, and book publications were not available.

The absence of listed recent papers means there are no recorded paper titles, publication years, or venues to review at this time.

Likewise, there are no details on co-authors or common publication venues where their research predominated.

No information was provided regarding primary or secondary fields of study, subfields, or particular research topics explored throughout their work.

There are also no records of any awards or book publications associated with Barry F. Sherr.

Given they are deceased, this overview summarizes the available data without current or ongoing research details.

Best Publications

  • Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs.

    Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr

  • Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory.

    Barry F. Sherr;Evelyn B. Sherr;Robert D. Fallon

  • Role of microbes in pelagic food webs: A revised concept

    Evelyn Sherr;Barry F. Sherr

  • Bacterivory and herbivory: Key roles of phagotrophic protists in pelagic food webs.

    E. B. Sherr;B. F. Sherr

  • Size-selective grazing on bacteria by natural assemblages of estuarine flagellates and ciliates.

    Juan M. Gonzalez;Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr

  • Heterotrophic dinoflagellates: a significant component of microzooplankton biomass and major grazers of diatoms in the sea

    Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr

  • High rates of consumption of bacteria by pelagic ciliates

    Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr

  • Protozoa in Planktonic Food Webs1,2

    Karen G. Porter;Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr;Michael Pace

  • Staining of Heterotrophic Protists for Visualization via Epifluorescence Microscopy

    Evelyn B. Sherr;David A. Caron;Barry F. Sherr

  • Effect of protistan grazing on the frequency of dividing cells in bacterioplankton assemblages.

    Barry F. Sherr;Evelyn B. Sherr;Julie McDaniel

  • Temporal and spatial variation in stocks of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbes in the upper water column of the central Arctic Ocean

    Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr;Patricia A. Wheeler;Karen Thompson

  • Grazing, growth, and ammonium excretion rates of a heterotrophic microflagellate fed with four species of bacteria.

    Barry F. Sherr;Evelyn B. Sherr;Thomas Berman

  • Estimating abundunce and single-cell characteristics of respiring bacteria via the redox dye CTC

    Barry F. Sherr;Paul del Giorgio;Evelyn B. Sherr

  • Rates of digestion of bacteria by marine phagotrophic protozoa: temperature dependence.

    Barry F. Sherr;Evelyn B. Sherr;Fereidoun Rassoulzadegan

  • Trophic interactions between heterotrophic Protozoa and bacterioplankton in estuarine water analyzed with selective metabolic inhibitors

    BF Sherr;EB Sherr;TL Andrew;RD Fallon

  • Mesozooplankton prey preference and grazing impact in the Western Arctic Ocean

    Robert G. Campbell;Evelyn B. Sherr;Carin J. Ashjian;Stéphane Plourde

  • High bacterial production, uptake and concentrations of dissolved organic matter in the Central Arctic Ocean

    James Rich;Michel Gosselin;Evelyn Sherr;Barry Sherr

  • Simultaneous measurement of bacterio-plankton production and protozoan bacterivory in estuarine water

    Barry F. Sherr;Evelyn Sherr;Carlos Pedrós-Alió

  • Small, aloricate ciliates as a major component of the marine heterotrophic nanoplankton1

    Evelyn B. Sherr;Barry F. Sherr;Robert D. Fallon;Steven Y. Newell

  • The joint roles of Pacific and Atlantic-origin waters in the Canada Basin, 1997 1998

    F.A McLaughlin;E.C Carmack;R.W Macdonald;H Melling

  • DIFFERENTIAL FEEDING BY MARINE FLAGELLATES ON GROWING VERSUS STARVING, AND ON MOTILE VERSUS NONMOTILE, BACTERIAL PREY

    Juan M. Gonzalez;Evelyn Sherr;Barry F. Sherr

Frequent Co-Authors

Evelyn B. Sherr
Evelyn B. Sherr Oregon State University
Patricia A. Wheeler
Patricia A. Wheeler Oregon State University
William T. Peterson
William T. Peterson National Marine Fisheries Service
Tom Berman
Tom Berman National Institute of Oceanography
David A. Caron
David A. Caron University of Southern California
Fereidoun Rassoulzadegan
Fereidoun Rassoulzadegan Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
S. Craig Cary
S. Craig Cary University of Waikato
Carin J. Ashjian
Carin J. Ashjian Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Michael W. Lomas
Michael W. Lomas Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences
Peter G. Verity
Peter G. Verity Skidaway Institute of Oceanography

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of online and hybrid degree programs, offering flexibility and accessibility for students across the USA. For those interested in understanding historical perspectives on environmental change, the best online history masters can provide valuable interdisciplinary knowledge relevant to ecosystem research and public policy roles.

Careers outside direct scientific research are also available. For example, becoming a science librarian or managing digital biological archives requires a specialized degree. If you’re curious about the educational pathway, learn how much does it cost to become a librarian and discover programs that complement your ecology background.

Communication is key in environmental education and outreach. For those looking to transition into speech-language pathology, there are asha accredited slp programs offering fast-track online study. Non-majors can pursue an slp bridge program to build the qualifications needed for this impactful field.

Carefully exploring these related degrees and career pathways can help you customize your academic journey and enhance your professional opportunities in ecology, communication, education, and information science.

Best Scientists Citing Barry F. Sherr

Recently Published Articles