World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
4224
World Ranking
9527
National Ranking
798

B.-U. Meyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B.-U. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

B.-U. Meyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B.-U. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

B.-U. Meyer is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their academic profile reflects involvement in scientific research and scholarship at this institution.

The scientist's recent publications, co-authors, and frequent publication venues are not listed, which limits detailed insight into their specific research outputs or collaborative networks. There is also no information about main or subfields of study or particular topics of work related to their research activities.

There are no book publications or awards recorded in the available data, which suggests either a focus primarily on article-based research or that such information has not been provided.

This profile is based solely on the affiliation information available, without further data about their specialized research domains, academic contributions, or recognized achievements.

Best Publications

  • Topography of fibers in the human corpus callosum mediating interhemispheric inhibition between the motor cortices

    Bernd-Ulrich Meyer;Simone Röricht;Christian Woiciechowsky

  • Reorganisation of descending motor pathways in patients after hemispherectomy and severe hemispheric lesions demonstrated by magnetic brain stimulation

    R. Benecke;B.-U. Meyer;H.-J Freund

  • Brain parenchyma sonography discriminates Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes

    U. Walter;L. Niehaus;T. Probst;R. Benecke

  • MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex

    M.A. Nitsche;L. Niehaus;K.T. Hoffmann;S. Hengst

  • Absence of transcallosal inhibition following focal magnetic stimulation in preschool children.

    Florian Heinen;Franz-Xaver Glocker;Urban Fietzek;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer

  • Long-term reorganization of motor cortex outputs after arm amputation

    S. Röricht;B.-U. Meyer;L. Niehaus;S.A. Brandt

  • Clinical use of the magnetic stimulator in the investigation of peripheral conduction time.

    Thomas C. Britton;Bernd‐Ulrich Meyer;Jörg Herdmann;Reiner Benecke

  • Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Janna Gothe;Stephan A Brandt;Kerstin Irlbacher;Simone Röricht

  • Patterns of abnormal motor cortex excitability in atypical parkinsonian syndromes

    A.A Kühn;P Grosse;K Holtz;P Brown

  • Correlates of disability in multiple sclerosis detected by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    K. Schmierer;K. Irlbacher;P. Grosse;S. Röricht

  • Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex on memory-guided saccades

    S. A. Brandt;Christoph J. Ploner;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer;Stefanie Leistner

  • Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation

    L. Niehaus;B.-U. Meyer;T. Weyh

  • Left posterior BA37 is involved in object recognition: a TMS study.

    Lauren Stewart;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer;Uta Frith;John Rothwell

  • Conduction deficits of callosal fibres in early multiple sclerosis.

    Klaus Schmierer;Ludwig Niehaus;Simone Röricht;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer

  • Central motor pathways in patients with mirror movements.

    T C Britton;B U Meyer;R Benecke

  • Modulation of motor cortex excitability by pallidal stimulation in patients with severe dystonia.

    A. A. Kühn;B.-U. Meyer;T. Trottenberg;S. A. Brandt

  • Bilateral borderzone brain infarctions in association with heroin abuse

    Ludwig Niehaus;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer

  • Investigation of unilateral facial weakness: magnetic stimulation of the proximal facial nerve and of the face-associated motor cortex.

    B. U. Meyer;T. C. Britton;R. Benecke

  • Spatial reorganization of cortical motor output maps of stump muscles in human upper-limb amputees.

    Kerstin Irlbacher;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer;Martin Voss;Stephan A Brandt

  • Corticospinal excitability in human sleep as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    P. Grosse;R. Khatami;F. Salih;A. Kühn

  • The value of magnetic stimulation in the diagnosis of radiculopathies.

    Christian Bischoff;Bernd-Ulrich Meyer;Jochen Machetanz;Bastian Conrad

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Kupsch
Andreas Kupsch Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Reiner Benecke
Reiner Benecke University of Rostock
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Thomas Trottenberg
Thomas Trottenberg Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Bernhard A. Sabel
Bernhard A. Sabel Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
John C. Rothwell
John C. Rothwell University College London
Stephan A. Brandt
Stephan A. Brandt Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Malek Bajbouj
Malek Bajbouj Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Lauren Stewart
Lauren Stewart Goldsmiths University of London
Uta Frith
Uta Frith University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a variety of related online degrees can open doors to rewarding career pathways in mental health, research, counseling, and social work. Psychology, counseling, social work, and therapy are all popular fields that overlap with neuroscience concepts, and many universities now offer flexible online options for these programs.

If you’re looking to minimize costs, consider exploring a cheap online psychology degree for an affordable entry point into behavioral sciences. Students seeking graduate credentials may also wonder how much does a masters in psychology cost—tuition can vary widely, but online options are often more budget-friendly than campus-based degrees.

For those aiming to support families and individuals in therapeutic settings, accredited online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provide direct pathways to licensure and clinical practice. Alternatively, individuals drawn to community and advocacy roles may benefit from completing one of the msw degree programs (Master of Social Work) that are accessible online.

By choosing the right online degree, neuroscience graduates can pursue professions that blend scientific research with compassionate practice, all while benefiting from flexible, affordable learning solutions.

Best Scientists Citing B.-U. Meyer

Recently Published Articles