World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
8005
World Ranking
8472
National Ranking
721

Stephan A. Brandt publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan A. Brandt sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephan A. Brandt D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan A. Brandt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan A. Brandt is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on social psychology, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, health, and general health professions.

The central themes of Brandt's work revolve around LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; intimate partner and family violence; sexuality, behavior, and technology; sexual assault and victimization studies; marriage and sexual relationships; sex work and related issues; and adolescent and pediatric healthcare.

Brandt's frequently published work appears in several academic venues, including:

  • Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Journal of Family Violence
  • NeuroImage Clinical

Their recent papers comprise:

  • "Does online support matter? The relationship between online identity-related support, mattering, and well-being in sexual minority men" (2020, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • "A Qualitative Study of Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Gay and Bisexual Men" (2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence)
  • "Enacted and anticipated stigma related to consensual nonmonogamy among LGBTQ+ adults." (2022, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity)
  • "Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Young Adults" (2023, Journal of Family Violence)
  • "Non-invasive brain stimulation modulates neural correlates of performance monitoring in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder" (2022, NeuroImage Clinical)

Brandt frequently collaborates with other researchers on various projects. Their main co-authors include:

  • Christopher B. Stults
  • Walter Kaczetow
  • Kristen D. Krause
  • Marybec Griffin
  • Roberto L. Abreu

Best Publications

  • α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection

    Gregor Thut;Annika Nietzel;Stephan A. Brandt;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets

    Jody C. Culham;Stephan A. Brandt;Stephan A. Brandt;Patrick Cavanagh;Nancy G. Kanwisher

  • Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene

    Stephan A. Brandt;Lawrence W. Stark

  • Consensus paper: Combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging

    Hartwig R. Siebner;Hartwig R. Siebner;Til O. Bergmann;Sven Bestmann;Sven Bestmann;Marcello Massimini

  • A Physiological Correlate of the "Zoom Lens" of Visual Attention

    Notger G. Müller;Oliver A. Bartelt;Tobias H. Donner;Arno Villringer

  • Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation

    Thomas Picht;Sein Schmidt;Stephan Brandt;Dietmar Frey

  • Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks.

    Tobias H. Donner;Andreas Kettermann;Eugen Diesch;Florian Ostendorf

  • The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation.

    Björn Hauptmann;Eva Reinhart;Stephan A. Brandt;Avi Karni

  • Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search.

    Tobias Donner;Andreas Kettermann;Eugen Diesch;Florian Ostendorf

  • Effects of GABAA and GABAB agonists on interhemispheric inhibition in man

    Unknown

  • Long-term reorganization of motor cortex outputs after arm amputation

    S. Röricht;B.-U. Meyer;L. Niehaus;S.A. Brandt

  • Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Carolin Gall;Sein Schmidt;Michael P. Schittkowski;Andrea Antal

  • Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Janna Gothe;Stephan A Brandt;Kerstin Irlbacher;Simone Röricht

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry.

    Antje Kraft;Jasper Roehmel;Manuel C. Olma;Sein Schmidt

  • An initial transient-state and reliable measures of corticospinal excitability in TMS studies.

    S. Schmidt;R.M. Cichy;A. Kraft;J. Brocke

  • Representational overlap of adjacent fingers in multiple areas of human primary somatosensory cortex depends on electrical stimulus intensity: an fMRI study

    Thomas Krause;Ralf Kurth;Jan Ruben;Jessica Schwiemann

  • Long-Lasting Enhancement of Visual Perception with Repetitive Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

    Janina R. Behrens;Antje Kraft;Kerstin Irlbacher;Holger Gerhardt

  • Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning and vision-related quality of life in optic neuropathy

    Carolin Gall;Susann Sgorzaly;Sein Schmidt;Stephan Brandt

  • Neural mechanisms of concurrent stimulus processing in dual tasks.

    Christine Stelzel;Christine Stelzel;Stephan A. Brandt;Torsten Schubert

  • The functional neuroanatomy of visual conjunction search. A parametric fMRI study

    Notger G Müller;Tobias H Donner;Tobias H Donner;Oliver A Bartelt;Stephan A Brandt

  • Saccadic suppression induces focal hypooxygenation in the occipital cortex

    Rüdiger Wenzel;Rüdiger Wenzel;Petra Wobst;Hauke H. Heekeren;Kenneth K. Kwong

  • Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates

    Sein Schmidt;Rouven Bathe-Peters;Robert Fleischmann;Maria Rönnefarth

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Fahle
Manfred Fahle University of Bremen
Jan vom Brocke
Jan vom Brocke University of Münster
Bernhard A. Sabel
Bernhard A. Sabel Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Torsten Schubert
Torsten Schubert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Christoph J. Ploner
Christoph J. Ploner Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Norbert Kathmann
Norbert Kathmann Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Werner Sommer
Werner Sommer Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Sven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t just mean traditional campus programs. Today, students can take advantage of accelerated programs online, making it possible to fast-track a neuroscience degree and enter the field sooner. These flexible options cater to those balancing work or personal responsibilities, offering a pathway to career advancement without a lengthy commitment.

When considering your future, it’s essential to assess which degrees align with both your interests and market demand. Neuroscience pairs well with some of the best bachelor degrees to get, like biochemistry, computer science, or psychology. Many students also research the most lucrative college majors to maximize earning potential within health, biomedical engineering, or data science roles.

Cost is an important factor, but there are affordable opportunities for online learning. Prospective students should look at the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa to make a neuroscience degree more accessible. Thoughtful planning will help you find the right academic and financial fit for your future in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan A. Brandt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles