World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
10582
World Ranking
11895
National Ranking
4849

Sheila S. Hemami publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheila S. Hemami sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sheila S. Hemami D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheila S. Hemami sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Algorithm

Sheila S. Hemami focuses on Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Human visual system model, Algorithm and Wavelet. She combines topics linked to Pattern recognition with her work on Artificial intelligence. In the field of Pattern recognition, her study on Image segmentation overlaps with subjects such as Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition.

In her study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Computer vision, Interpolation and Iterative reconstruction is strongly linked to Lossy compression. The various areas that she examines in her Wavelet study include Bicubic interpolation, Image compression, Bilinear interpolation and Mathematical analysis. The Edge detection study combines topics in areas such as Pixel and Segmentation.

Her most cited work include:

  • Frequency-tuned salient region detection (2817 citations)
  • VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images (919 citations)
  • Regularity-preserving image interpolation (287 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of study are Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Data compression, Algorithm and Wavelet. Her study on Artificial intelligence is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Pattern recognition. The study incorporates disciplines such as Pixel, Estimator and Edge detection in addition to Pattern recognition.

Her Computer vision study which covers Lossy compression that intersects with Lossless compression. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mean squared error and Theoretical computer science. Her Wavelet research incorporates themes from Quantization, Spatial frequency and Masking.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (58.96%)
  • Computer vision (45.52%)
  • Data compression (29.85%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2010-2019)?

  • Artificial intelligence (58.96%)
  • Computer vision (45.52%)
  • Pattern recognition (22.39%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Pattern recognition, Encoder and Data compression are her primary areas of study. Her Artificial intelligence study frequently involves adjacent topics like Coding. In her work, she performs multidisciplinary research in Computer vision and Psychophysics.

Her Pattern recognition study incorporates themes from Estimator and No reference. Sheila S. Hemami interconnects Uncompressed video, Control, Multi-objective optimization, Algorithm and Video quality in the investigation of issues within Encoder. The concepts of her Data compression study are interwoven with issues in Intelligibility, Speech recognition, Focus and Visual communication.

Between 2010 and 2019, her most popular works were:

  • Perceptual Visual Signal Compression and Transmission (54 citations)
  • A Computational Intelligibility Model for Assessment and Compression of American Sign Language Video (17 citations)
  • Estimating the usefulness of distorted natural images using an image contour degradation measure. (17 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Computer vision

Sheila S. Hemami mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Data compression, Visual communication and Light field. Her study in Artificial intelligence is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Estimator and Pattern recognition. Her Computer vision research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Parametric statistics and Quality assessment.

Her research in Data compression intersects with topics in Signal compression, Video compression picture types, Video quality and Human visual system model. She has researched Visual communication in several fields, including Intelligibility, Speech recognition, Encoder and Videoconferencing. Her studies deal with areas such as Homography, Compression and Approximation theory as well as Light field.

Best Publications

  • Frequency-tuned salient region detection

    Radhakrishna Achanta;Sheila Hemami;Francisco Estrada;Sabine Susstrunk

  • VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images

    D.M. Chandler;S.S. Hemami

  • Regularity-preserving image interpolation

    W.K. Carey;D.B. Chuang;S.S. Hemami

  • Transform coded image reconstruction exploiting interblock correlation

    S.S. Hemami;T.H.-Y. Meng

  • No-reference image and video quality estimation: Applications and human-motivated design

    Sheila S. Hemami;Amy R. Reibman

  • A scalable wavelet-based video distortion metric and applications

    M. Masry;S.S. Hemami;Y. Sermadevi

  • Understanding and simplifying the structural similarity metric

    D.M. Rouse;S.S. Hemami

  • Dynamic contrast-based quantization for lossy wavelet image compression

    D.M. Chandler;S.S. Hemami

  • Subband-coded image reconstruction for lossy packet networks

    S.S. Hemami;R.M. Gray

  • Perceptual Visual Signal Compression and Transmission

    Hong Ren Wu;A. R. Reibman;Weisi Lin;F. Pereira

  • A metric for continuous quality evaluation of compressed video with severe distortions

    Mark A. Masry;Sheila S. Hemami

  • ANALYZING THE ROLE OF VISUAL STRUCTURE IN THE RECOGNITION OF NATURAL IMAGE CONTENT WITH MULTI-SCALE SSIM

    David M. Rouse;Sheila S. Hemami

  • Multiple Description Quantization Via Gram–Schmidt Orthogonalization

    Jun Chen;Chao Tian;T. Berger;S.S. Hemami

  • Universal multiple description scalar quantization: analysis and design

    Chao Tian;S.S. Hemami

  • Effects of natural images on the detectability of simple and compound wavelet subband quantization distortions

    Damon M. Chandler;Sheila S. Hemami

  • Suprathreshold wavelet coefficient quantization in complex stimuli: psychophysical evaluation and analysis.

    Marcia G. Ramos;Sheila S. Hemami

  • A new class of multiple description scalar quantizer and its application to image coding

    Chao Tian;S.S. Hemami

  • What's your sign?: efficient sign coding for embedded wavelet image coding

    A. Deever;S.S. Hemami

  • Lossless image compression with projection-based and adaptive reversible integer wavelet transforms

    A.T. Deever;S.S. Hemami

  • Generalized rate-distortion optimization for motion-compensated video coders

    Yan Yang;S.S. Hemami

Frequent Co-Authors

Chao Tian
Chao Tian Texas A&M University
Robert M. Gray
Robert M. Gray Stanford University
Teresa H. Meng
Teresa H. Meng Stanford University
Patrick Le Callet
Patrick Le Callet University of Nantes
Amy R. Reibman
Amy R. Reibman Purdue University West Lafayette
Richard E. Ladner
Richard E. Ladner University of Washington
Eve A. Riskin
Eve A. Riskin University of Washington
Weisi Lin
Weisi Lin Nanyang Technological University
Touradj Ebrahimi
Touradj Ebrahimi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Hong Ren Wu
Hong Ren Wu RMIT University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of educational and career options. Many students begin with an online associate's degree to build foundational skills quickly and at a lower cost. This pathway can be a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree or entry-level IT jobs.

For those looking to specialize or move up in their careers, pursuing the best masters degree to get in fields like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, or data science can increase employability and salary potential. Some professionals prefer the fastest masters degree online options to earn an advanced credential while balancing work and study.

Another valuable strategy is earning certifications that pay well. Industry-recognized certifications can lead to higher income and new job opportunities in technology, sometimes in less time than a traditional degree.

By combining degrees and certifications, students can create flexible, rewarding pathways that suit their goals in the tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Sheila S. Hemami

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles