World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
8216
World Ranking
11933
National Ranking
4876

Anthony Freeman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Freeman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 153 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anthony Freeman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Freeman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony Freeman is affiliated with the Jet Propulsion Lab in the United States and has contributed primarily to the fields of Engineering and Physics and Astronomy. Their research spans various subfields, notably Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, with additional work related to Global and Planetary Change, Emergency Medicine, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics in space and planetary sciences, including:

  • Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Satellite Communication Systems
  • Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Astro and Planetary Science

Notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Anthony Freeman include:

  • "Designing an Observing System to Study the Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) of the Earth in the 2020s," 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • "The Impact of System Noise in Polarimetric SAR Imagery on Oil Spill Observations," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • "Exploring our solar system with CubeSats and SmallSats: the dawn of a new era," 2020, CEAS Space Journal
  • "Reducing frequent caller use of ambulance services: a review of effective strategies," 2025, Journal of Paramedic Practice
  • "Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report Chapter 5: Enabling technologies for planetary exploration," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Freeman include:

  • E. Natasha Stavros
  • Jon Chrone
  • Kerry Cawse-Nicholson
  • Nancy F. Glenn
  • Liane Guild

Freeman's research is often published in venues that reflect their interdisciplinary approach, with multiple works appearing in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • CEAS Space Journal
  • Journal of Paramedic Practice

Best Publications

  • A three-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data

    A. Freeman;S.L. Durden

  • SAR calibration: an overview

    A. Freeman

  • Fitting a Two-Component Scattering Model to Polarimetric SAR Data From Forests

    A. Freeman

  • Calibration of linearly polarized polarimetric SAR data subject to Faraday rotation

    A. Freeman

  • The "Myth" of the minimum SAR antenna area constraint

    A. Freeman;W.T.K. Johnson;B. Huneycutt;R. Jordan

  • On the detection of Faraday rotation in linearly polarized L-band SAR backscatter signatures

    A. Freeman;S.S. Saatchi

  • The Global Rain Forest Mapping project— a review

    Aã . Rosenqvist;M. Shimada;B. Chapman;A. Freeman

  • Polarimetric SAR calibration experiment using active radar calibrators

    A. Freeman;Y. Shen;C.L. Werner

  • Three-component scattering model to describe polarimetric SAR data

    Anthony Freeman;Stephen L. Durden

  • SweepSAR: Beam-forming on receive using a reflector-phased array feed combination for spaceborne SAR

    A. Freeman;G. Krieger;P. Rosen;M. Younis

  • Satellite sensor requirements for monitoring essential biodiversity variables of coastal ecosystems

    Frank E. Muller‐Karger;Erin Hestir;Christiana Ade;Kevin Turpie

  • Estimation of Soil Moisture and Faraday Rotation from Bare Surfaces using Compact Polarimetry.

    My-Linh Truong-Loi;A. Freeman;P. Dubois-Fernandez;Eric Pottier

  • SIR-C data quality and calibration results

    A. Freeman;M. Alves;B. Chapman;J. Cruz

  • Effect of Salinity on the Dielectric Properties of Geological Materials: Implication for Soil Moisture Detection by Means of Radar Remote Sensing

    Y. Lasne;P. Paillou;A. Freeman;T. Farr

  • Calibration of Stokes and scattering matrix format polarimetric SAR data

    A. Freeman;J.J. van Zyl;J.D. Klein;H.A. Zebker

  • The NASA/JPL Multifrequency, Multipolarisation Airborne SAR System

    D.N. Held;W.E. Brown;A. Freeman;J.D. Klein

  • Ionospheric effects on SAR imaging: a numerical study

    Jun Liu;Y. Kuga;A. Ishimaru;Xiaoqing Pi

  • Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images of moving targets

    A. Freeman;A. Currie

  • Geometric accuracy in airborne SAR images

    D. Blacknell;A. Freeman;S. Quegan;I.A. Ward

  • Imaging ionospheric inhomogeneities using spaceborne synthetic aperture radar

    Xiaoqing Pi;Anthony Freeman;Bruce Chapman;Paul Rosen

  • The tandem-L mission proposal: Monitoring earth's dynamics with high resolution SAR interferometry

    G. Krieger;I. Hajnsek;K. Papathanassiou;M. Eineder

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Rosen
Paul A. Rosen Jet Propulsion Lab
Scott Hensley
Scott Hensley Jet Propulsion Lab
Kenneth C. Jezek
Kenneth C. Jezek The Ohio State University
Tom G. Farr
Tom G. Farr California Institute of Technology
Ernesto Rodriguez
Ernesto Rodriguez Jet Propulsion Lab
Larry Matthies
Larry Matthies Jet Propulsion Lab
Howard A. Zebker
Howard A. Zebker Stanford University
Ron Kwok
Ron Kwok University of Washington
John W. Holt
John W. Holt University of Arizona
Kamal Sarabandi
Kamal Sarabandi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career paths. As technology continues to shape industries, there is growing interest in specialized and interdisciplinary fields that blend computing with other scientific areas.

If you seek flexibility and a faster path to graduation, consider exploring the fastest computer science degree options available online. These programs are designed for students looking to quickly build tech skills and enter the workforce.

For those interested in environmental sustainability, an environmental engineering degree online offers a unique blend of engineering expertise and ecological insight. Similarly, professionals aiming for a competitive edge may consider the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs, which provide advanced technical skills without breaking the bank.

Finally, a bachelor of science in physics online is another flexible route for students interested in foundational sciences with strong problem-solving demand in multiple sectors. Exploring these pathways can help you tailor your education to match career goals in the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Freeman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles