World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
11050
World Ranking
3301
National Ranking
1600

Andrew C. Gallagher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 234 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrew C. Gallagher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew C. Gallagher is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their research spans the intersecting domains of computer science and medicine, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to scientific inquiry.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their subfields of focus consist of:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Key topics in their work include:

  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Face and Expression Recognition
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Morecambe Bay medical journal

Notable recent papers include:

  • "von Mises-Fisher Loss: An Exploration of Embedding Geometries for Supervised Learning," 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • "Building One-class Detector for Anything: Open-vocabulary Zero-shot OOD Detection Using Text-image Models," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "von Mises-Fisher Loss: An Exploration of Embedding Geometries for Supervised Learning," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Cost-effectiveness analysis of a resource-intensive approach versus minimally invasive strategy for high-risk transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients," 2022, Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • "von Mises-Fisher Loss: An Exploration of Embedding Geometries for Supervised Learning," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Andrew C. Gallagher include:

  • Tyler R. Scott
  • Michael C. Mozer
  • Yunhao Ge
  • Jie Ren
  • Jiaping Zhao

Best Publications

  • Describing clothing by semantic attributes

    Huizhong Chen;Andrew Gallagher;Bernd Girod

  • Understanding images of groups of people

    Andrew C Gallagher;Tsuhan Chen

  • Clothing cosegmentation for recognizing people

    A.C. Gallagher;Tsuhan Chen

  • Detection of linear and cubic interpolation in JPEG compressed images

    A.C. Gallagher

  • AREA-SELECTABLE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND DEVICE THEREFOR

    Goodwin Robert M;Gallagher Andrew

  • Location based image classification with map segmentation

    Andrew Charles Gallagher;Bryan Daniel Kraus;Alexander C. Loui

  • Determining a particular person from a collection

    Andrew Charles Gallagher;Madirakshi Das;Alexander C. Loui

  • A mixed bag of emotions: Model, predict, and transfer emotion distributions

    Kuan-Chuan Peng;Tsuhan Chen;Amir Sadovnik;Andrew Gallagher

  • Camera using multiple lenses and image sensors in a rangefinder configuration to provide a range map

    John N. Border;Amy D. Enge;Efrain O. Morales;Bruce H. Pillman

  • Geotagging in multimedia and computer vision--a survey

    Jiebo Luo;Dhiraj Joshi;Jie Yu;Andrew Gallagher

  • PROCESSING METHOD FOR DIGITAL COLOR IMAGE

    Gallagher Andrew Charles;Gindele Edward Brooks

  • The wisdom of social multimedia: using flickr for prediction and forecast

    Xin Jin;Andrew Gallagher;Liangliang Cao;Jiebo Luo

  • Identifying collection images with special events

    Andrew Charles Gallagher;Samuel M. Fryer;Alexander C. Loui;Jason Rey Oliver

  • Jigsaw puzzles with pieces of unknown orientation

    Andrew C. Gallagher

  • Remote determination of image-acquisition settings and opportunities

    John Randall Fredlund;Bruce Harold Pillman;Andrew Charles Gallagher;Andrew C. Blose

  • Color image reproduction of scenes with preferential color mapping and scene-dependent tone scaling

    John D. c;Andrew C. c

  • Aworldwide tourism recommendation system based on geotaggedweb photos

    Liangliang Cao;Jiebo Luo;Andrew Gallagher;Xin Jin

  • Seeing people in social context: recognizing people and social relationships

    Gang Wang;Andrew Gallagher;Jiebo Luo;David Forsyth

  • Image authentication by detecting traces of demosaicing

    A.C. Gallagher;Tsuhan Chen

  • Forming connections between image collections

    Andrew Charles Gallagher

Frequent Co-Authors

Tsuhan Chen
Tsuhan Chen Cornell University
Alexander C. Loui
Alexander C. Loui Rochester Institute of Technology
Jiebo Luo
Jiebo Luo University of Rochester
Kenneth A. Parulski
Kenneth A. Parulski aKAP Innovation, LLC
Dhruv Batra
Dhruv Batra Georgia Institute of Technology
John Norvold Border
John Norvold Border Kodak (France)
Caroline Pantofaru
Caroline Pantofaru Google (United States)
Devi Parikh
Devi Parikh Facebook (United States)
Bernd Girod
Bernd Girod Stanford University
Cordelia Schmid
Cordelia Schmid French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring further options beyond a traditional Computer Science degree can help broaden your skills and career opportunities. Many students look to combine technical expertise with business acumen, making an cheapest online mba a popular choice for those seeking a cost-effective way to advance into management roles.

For those wanting to fast-track their education, a 1 year masters degree can be an efficient way to gain specialized knowledge and boost credentials in less time. If cost and speed are key considerations, you might explore easiest online degrees that pay well, which can offer strong earning potential without requiring years of study.

Artificial Intelligence remains a rapidly growing field within Computer Science. For those interested, pursuing online degrees in ai can lead to exciting roles in tech innovation and research.

Each pathway offers unique benefits. Consider your career goals, time commitment, and budget to select the best fit for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C. Gallagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles