World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7778 7178 3339 3018 157 8750

Andreia V. Faria publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andreia V. Faria between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andreia V. Faria published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2025. 48 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2025. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 30 publications
2002 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andreia V. Faria: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 5
2006 3
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 6
2011 7
2012 7
2013 12
2014 6
2015 6
2016 8
2017 9
2018 12
2019 11
2020 6
2021 29
2022 17
2023 15
2024 18
2025 30
Total 227
Download as CSV

Andreia V. Faria publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreia V. Faria sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 157 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 157
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Andreia V. Faria D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreia V. Faria sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andreia V. Faria is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans significant areas within medicine and neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Subfields of particular interest to their work encompass:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Research topics frequently addressed in their publications are:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Their recent paper contributions include:

  • Deep learning-based detection and segmentation of diffusion abnormalities in acute ischemic stroke, 2021, Communications Medicine
  • Digital 3D Brain MRI Arterial Territories Atlas, 2023, Scientific Data
  • Identifying canonical and replicable multi-scale intrinsic connectivity networks in 100k+ resting-state fMRI datasets, 2023, Human Brain Mapping
  • Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Brain Iron and β-Amyloid in MRI and PET Relating to Cognitive Performance in Cognitively Normal Older Adults, 2020, Radiology
  • White Matter Integrity Predicts Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) and Language Therapy Effects in Primary Progressive Aphasia, 2020, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Andreia V. Faria collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Argye E. Hillis
  • Anja Soldan
  • Michael I. Miller
  • Akira Sawa
  • Chin-Fu Liu

The preferred publication outlets where the scientist has multiple contributions include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Aphasiology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template

    Susumu Mori;Susumu Mori;Kenichi Oishi;Hangyi Jiang;Li Jiang

  • Atlas-based whole brain white matter analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: application to normal elderly and Alzheimer's disease participants.

    Kenichi Oishi;Andreia Faria;Hangyi Jiang;Hangyi Jiang;Xin Li

  • Human brain white matter atlas: Identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter

    Kenichi Oishi;Karl Zilles;Katrin Amunts;Andreia Faria

  • Atlas-guided tract reconstruction for automated and comprehensive examination of the white matter anatomy.

    Yajing Zhang;Jiangyang Zhang;Kenichi Oishi;Andreia Faria

  • Multi-contrast human neonatal brain atlas: application to normal neonate development analysis.

    Kenichi Oishi;Susumu Mori;Susumu Mori;Pamela K. Donohue;Thomas Ernst

  • MRICloud: Delivering High-Throughput MRI Neuroinformatics as Cloud-Based Software as a Service

    Susumu Mori;Dan Wu;Can Ceritoglu;Yue Li

  • White matter atlases based on diffusion tensor imaging.

    Susumu Mori;Kenichi Oishi;Andreia V Faria

  • Atlas-based analysis of neurodevelopment from infancy to adulthood using diffusion tensor imaging and applications for automated abnormality detection

    Andreia V. Faria;Jiangyang Zhang;Kenichi Oishi;Xin Li

  • Bayesian Parameter Estimation and Segmentation in the Multi-Atlas Random Orbit Model

    Xiaoying Tang;Kenichi Oishi;Andreia V. Faria;Argye E. Hillis

  • Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures.

    Issel Anne L. Lim;Issel Anne L. Lim;Andreia V. Faria;Xu Li;Xu Li;Johnny T.C. Hsu

  • Atlas-Based Analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity: Evaluation for Reproducibility and Multi-Modal Anatomy-Function Correlation Studies

    Andreia V. Faria;Suresh E. Joel;Suresh E. Joel;Yajing Zhang;Kenichi Oishi

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of normal brain development

    Shoko Yoshida;Kenichi Oishi;Andreia V. Faria;Susumu Mori;Susumu Mori

  • Separable systems for recovery of finger strength and control after stroke

    Jing Xu;Naveed Ejaz;Naveed Ejaz;Benjamin Hertler;Meret Branscheidt;Meret Branscheidt

  • Critical role of the right uncinate fasciculus in emotional empathy.

    Kenichi Oishi;Andreia V. Faria;John Hsu;Donna Tippett

  • Cerebral venous thrombosis: influence of risk factors and imaging findings on prognosis.

    Simone Appenzeller;Carlos Borelli Zeller;Joyce M. Annichino-Bizzachi;Lilian T.L. Costallat

  • Quantitative evaluation of brain development using anatomical MRI and diffusion tensor imaging.

    Kenichi Oishi;Andreia V. Faria;Shoko Yoshida;Linda Chang

  • Quantitative Analysis of Brain Pathology Based on MRI and Brain Atlases - Applications for Cerebral Palsy

    Andreia V. Faria;Andreia V. Faria;Alexander Hoon;Elaine Stashinko;Xin Li

  • Multi-atlas tool for automated segmentation of brain gray matter nuclei and quantification of their magnetic susceptibility.

    Xu Li;Xu Li;Lin Chen;Kwame S. Kutten;Can Ceritoglu

  • The effect of tDCS on functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia.

    Bronte N. Ficek;Zeyi Wang;Yi Zhao;Kimberly T. Webster

  • Multi-Contrast Multi-Atlas Parcellation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Human Brain

    Xiaoying Tang;Shoko Yoshida;John Hsu;Thierry A. G. M. Huisman

  • Linking white matter and deep gray matter alterations in premanifest Huntington disease

    Andreia V. Faria;J. Tilak Ratnanather;Daniel J. Tward;David Soobin Lee

  • Distinct mechanisms and timing of language recovery after stroke.

    Samson Jarso;Muwei Li;Andreia Faria;Cameron Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Susumu Mori
Susumu Mori Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Peter C.M. van Zijl
Peter C.M. van Zijl Kennedy Krieger Institute
Fernando Cendes
Fernando Cendes State University of Campinas
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Constantine Frangakis
Constantine Frangakis Johns Hopkins University
Akira Sawa
Akira Sawa Johns Hopkins University
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Christopher A. Ross
Christopher A. Ross Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Jörn Diedrichsen
Jörn Diedrichsen University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, you may also want to explore related online degrees and career options. Programs in psychology, social work, counseling, and therapy can provide alternative or complementary pathways, especially for those passionate about the human mind and behavior.

For students concerned about affordability, pursuing a cheap online psychology degree can be a practical starting point. Psychology degrees can open doors to various roles in research, counseling, and mental health services.

Those looking for programs that are easier to get into might consider the easiest social work programs to get into. Social work degrees are in high demand and offer rewarding careers helping individuals, families, and communities.

If your interests lean toward clinical practice, a psyd online degree prepares you for advanced clinical psychology careers. There are also accredited online mft programs accredited, ideal for those looking to become licensed marriage and family therapists in a shorter time frame.

Each of these online degrees can complement a background in neuroscience, broadening your career opportunities in mental health and behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Andreia V. Faria

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles