World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
36
Citations
3859
World Ranking
7394
National Ranking
2523

Shaul Hurwitz publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaul Hurwitz sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 176 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Shaul Hurwitz D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaul Hurwitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shaul Hurwitz is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Environmental Science. The scientist's work frequently addresses topics such as Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry. Additional areas of investigation include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, earthquake and tectonic studies, and Seismic Waves and Analysis.

Hurwitz has contributed extensively to publications, especially in several prominent scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Geophysical Research Letters, and Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth.

The scientist's recent papers cover diverse topics related to hydrothermal systems, volcanic activity, and geochemical processes. Notable publications include:

  • The Systematics of Chlorine, Lithium, and Boron and δ37Cl, δ7Li, and δ11B in the Hydrothermal System of the Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field (2021, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems)
  • The Prevalence and Significance of Offset Magma Reservoirs at Arc Volcanoes (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • The 2018 reawakening and eruption dynamics of Steamboat Geyser, the world's tallest active geyser (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Dating silica sinter (geyserite): A cautionary tale (2020, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research)
  • The structure and volume of large geysers in Yellowstone National Park, USA and the mineralogy and chemistry of their silica sinter deposits (2021, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research)

Collaboration has been a consistent element in Hurwitz's career, with frequent co-authors including Michael Manga, Sara Peek, R. Blaine McCleskey, Jefferson Hungerford, and D. M. Churchill.

Their body of work integrates multiple subfields such as Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Geochemistry and Petrology, Global and Planetary Change, and applications of Artificial Intelligence in geosciences. This interdisciplinary approach supports a broad examination of earth systems and their processes.

Best Publications

  • Bubble nucleation in rhyolitic melts: Experiments at high pressure, temperature, and water content

    Shaul Hurwitz;Oded Navon

  • Numerical simulation of magmatic hydrothermal systems

    S. E. Ingebritsen;Sebastian Geiger;S. Hurwitz;Thomas Driesner

  • Dynamics of the Yellowstone hydrothermal system

    Shaul Hurwitz;Jacob B. Lowenstern

  • Bubble growth in rhyolitic melts: experimental and numerical investigation

    Vladimir Lyakhovsky;Shaul Hurwitz;Oded Navon

  • Monitoring a Supervolcano in Repose : Heat and Volatile Flux at the Yellowstone Caldera

    Jacob B. Lowenstern;Shaul Hurwitz

  • Groundwater flow, heat transport, and water table position within volcanic edifices: Implications for volcanic processes in the Cascade Range

    Shaul Hurwitz;Kenneth L. Kipp;Steven E. Ingebritsen;Mark E. Reid

  • Hydrothermal fluid flow and deformation in large calderas: Inferences from numerical simulations

    Shaul Hurwitz;Lizet B. Christiansen;Paul A. Hsieh

  • The tectonic framework of a complex pull-apart basin: seismic reflection observations in the Sea of Galilee, Dead Sea transform

    Shaul Hurwitz;Zvi Garfunkel;Yuval Ben-Gai;Margaret Reznikov

  • Volatile emissions and gas geochemistry of Hot Spring Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA

    C. Werner;S. Hurwitz;William C. Evans;J. B. Lowenstern

  • Annual modulation of seismicity along the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, CA

    Lizet B. Christiansen;Shaul Hurwitz;Steven E. Ingebritsen

  • Seasonal seismicity at western United States volcanic centers

    L.B. Christiansen;S. Hurwitz;M.O. Saar;S.E. Ingebritsen

  • Heat flow in vapor dominated areas of the Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field: Implications for the thermal budget of the Yellowstone Caldera

    Shaul Hurwitz;Robert Harris;Cynthia Anne Werner;Fred Murphy

  • Numerical models of caldera deformation: Effects of multiphase and multicomponent hydrothermal fluid flow

    M. Hutnak;S. Hurwitz;S. E. Ingebritsen;P. A. Hsieh

  • The Fascinating and Complex Dynamics of Geyser Eruptions

    Shaul Hurwitz;Michael Manga

  • Climate-induced variations of geyser periodicity in Yellowstone National Park, USA

    Shaul Hurwitz;Ashish Kumar;Ralph Taylor;Henry Heasler

  • Generation and evolution of hydrothermal fluids at Yellowstone: Insights from the Heart Lake Geyser Basin

    J. B. Lowenstern;D. Bergfeld;William C. Evans;S. Hurwitz

  • Spatial and temporal geochemical trends in the hydrothermal system of Yellowstone National Park: Inferences from river solute fluxes

    Shaul Hurwitz;Jacob B. Lowenstern;Henry Heasler

  • Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Saline Springs: Sea of Galilee, Israel

    Alon Rimmer;Shaul Hurwitz;Haim Gvirtzman

  • Eruptions at Lone Star Geyser, Yellowstone National Park, USA: 1. Energetics and eruption dynamics

    Leif Karlstrom;Shaul Hurwitz;Robert A. Sohn;Jean Vandemeulebrouck

  • Triggering and modulation of geyser eruptions in Yellowstone National Park by earthquakes, earth tides, and weather

    Shaul Hurwitz;Robert A. Sohn;Karen M. Luttrell;Karen M. Luttrell;Michael Manga

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Manga
Michael Manga University of California, Berkeley
Jacob B. Lowenstern
Jacob B. Lowenstern United States Geological Survey
William C. Evans
William C. Evans United States Geological Survey
Steven E. Ingebritsen
Steven E. Ingebritsen United States Geological Survey
Robert A. Sohn
Robert A. Sohn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
R. Blaine McCleskey
R. Blaine McCleskey United States Geological Survey
Paul A. Hsieh
Paul A. Hsieh United States Geological Survey
Paul A. Bedrosian
Paul A. Bedrosian United States Geological Survey
Jaime D. Barnes
Jaime D. Barnes The University of Texas at Austin
Andrew G. Hunt
Andrew G. Hunt United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with other fields. For example, veterans looking to expand their skill set might explore a online photography bachelor degree for veterans. This can complement Earth Science studies by enhancing skills in remote sensing and environmental documentation.

Language skills are another valuable asset, especially in global environmental work and research. An online Spanish degrees for veterans program can provide linguistic fluency while fitting veterans’ unique educational needs and schedules.

Students seeking affordability and efficiency may find inspiration in programs like the online degree in Spanish, which highlights how strategic program selection impacts career outcomes and costs. This approach can be mirrored in Earth Science to maximize return on investment.

Creative interdisciplinary pathways are also worth considering. Some Earth Science professionals expand into environmental communication or policy through mfa online programs, blending artistic expression with scientific expertise to influence public understanding and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Shaul Hurwitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles