World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amir Averbuch

Amir Averbuch

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
9648
World Ranking
5131
National Ranking
80

Amir Averbuch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Averbuch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 369 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amir Averbuch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Averbuch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amir Averbuch is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel. Their research spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on several subfields and core topics.

The main fields of study for Averbuch include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Their work is concentrated in the following subfields of study:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Media Technology
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Signal Processing

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
  • Face and Expression Recognition
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Averbuch has contributed to various peer-reviewed venues, with multiple publications. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis
  • Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
  • New Astronomy
  • Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing

Frequent collaborators in research publications include:

  • Moshe Salhov
  • Valery A. Zheludev
  • Ofir Lindenbaum
  • Jonathan Hauser
  • Pekka Neittaanmäki

The scientist's recent papers comprise the following works:

  • "Gaussian bandwidth selection for manifold learning and classification," 2020, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
  • "Automated identification of transiting exoplanet candidates in NASA Transiting Exoplanets Survey Satellite (TESS) data with machine learning methods," 2021, New Astronomy
  • "An hybrid denoising algorithm based on directional wavelet packets," 2022, Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing
  • "Analytic and directional wavelet packets in the space of periodic signals," 2023, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis
  • "Cross-boosting of WNNM Image Denoising method by Directional Wavelet Packets," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Interacting multiple model methods in target tracking: a survey

    E. Mazor;A. Averbuch;Y. Bar-Shalom;J. Dayan

  • Automatic segmentation of moving objects in video sequences: a region labeling approach

    Y. Tsaig;A. Averbuch

  • Image compression using wavelet transform and multiresolution decomposition

    A. Averbuch;D. Lazar;M. Israeli

  • Color image segmentation based on adaptive local thresholds

    Ety Navon;Ofer Miller;Amir Averbuch

  • Fast and accurate Polar Fourier transform

    A. Averbuch;R.R. Coifman;D.L. Donoho;M. Elad

  • Fast adaptive wavelet packet image compression

    F.G. Meyer;A.Z. Averbuch;J.-O. Stromberg

  • Automatic object extraction

    Amir Averbuch;Ofer Miller

  • Pseudopolar-based estimation of large translations, rotations, and scalings in images

    Y. Keller;A. Averbuch;M. Israeli

  • Experiments with the Tangora 20,000 word speech recognizer

    A. Averbuch;L. Bahl;R. Bakis;P. Brown

  • Fast gradient methods based on global motion estimation for video compression

    Y. Keller;A. Averbuch

  • A Framework for Discrete Integral Transformations I—The Pseudopolar Fourier Transform

    A. Averbuch;R. R. Coifman;D. L. Donoho;M. Israeli

  • Radar target tracking-Viterbi versus IMM

    A. Averbuch;S. Itzikowitz;T. Kapon

  • Multisensor image registration via implicit similarity

    Y. Keller;A. Averbuch

  • Digital image thresholding, based on topological stable-state

    Arie Pikaz;Amir Averbuch

  • Deblocking of block-transform compressed images using weighted sums of symmetrically aligned pixels

    A.Z. Averbuch;A. Schclar;D.L. Donoho

  • Multilayered image representation: application to image compression

    F.G. Meyer;A.Z. Averbuch;R.R. Coifman

  • 3D Fourier based discrete Radon transform

    Amir Averbuch;Yoel Shkolnisky

  • Fast processing of an XML data stream

    Amir Averbuch;Shachar Harussi

  • Multiscale data sampling and function extension

    Amit Bermanis;Amir Averbuch;Ronald R. Coifman

  • FFT based image registration

    A. Averbuch;Y. Keller

  • Pseudo-Polar Based Estimation of Large Translations Rotations and Scalings in Images

    Yosi Keller;Amir Averbuch;Moshe Israeli

  • Image Compression Using Wavelet Transform

    Amir Averbuch;Danny Lazar;Moshe Israeli

Frequent Co-Authors

Pekka Neittaanmäki
Pekka Neittaanmäki University of Jyväskylä
Ronald R. Coifman
Ronald R. Coifman Yale University
David L. Donoho
David L. Donoho Stanford University
Anthony J. Weiss
Anthony J. Weiss Tel Aviv University
Zvi Galil
Zvi Galil Georgia Institute of Technology
Eli Turkel
Eli Turkel Tel Aviv University
Tapani Ristaniemi
Tapani Ristaniemi University of Jyväskylä
Gregory Beylkin
Gregory Beylkin University of Colorado Boulder
Michael Elad
Michael Elad Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Yaakov Bar-Shalom
Yaakov Bar-Shalom University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of educational and career options. Many students start by evaluating the best college degrees to pursue, ensuring long-term job prospects and earning potential. Computer Science frequently ranks high due to its relevance, versatility, and growth in the tech-driven job market.

For those interested in advancing quickly, considering one of the easiest master degree to get can be a strategic move. Such programs often include flexible coursework and accelerated tracks, helping students balance studies with other commitments.

Aspiring researchers and educators may seek the cheap phd programs online to further their expertise cost-effectively. Additionally, those looking for fast professional advancement into leadership or education roles might explore the easiest edd programs that offer flexible, expedited learning options.

Whether you choose a traditional or fast-track pathway, today’s online education landscape provides flexibility and affordability for future Computer Science professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Amir Averbuch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles