World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
11411
World Ranking
5354
National Ranking
107

Alexander Toet publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Toet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 257 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Alexander Toet D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Toet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

Alexander Toet is affiliated with the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields, notably computer science, psychology, and neuroscience, with a significant focus on subfields such as human-computer interaction, sensory systems, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including olfactory and sensory function studies, virtual reality applications and impacts, multisensory perception and integration, color perception and design, sensory analysis and statistical methods, tactile and sensory interactions, and visual attention and saliency detection.

Alexander Toet's recent publications illustrate a diverse research portfolio. These include:

  • Toward Enhanced Teleoperation Through Embodiment (2020), Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Quality of Experience in Telemeetings and Videoconferencing: A Comprehensive Survey (2022), IEEE Access
  • Retention and Transfer of Cognitive Bias Mitigation Interventions: A Systematic Literature Study (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • What Comes After Telepresence? Embodiment, Social Presence and Transporting One's Functional and Social Self (2022), 2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
  • An Immersive Self-Report Tool for the Affective Appraisal of 360° VR Videos (2020), Frontiers in Virtual Reality

Frequent collaborators in their work include Jan B. F. van Erp, Anne-Marie Brouwer, Erik Van der Burg, Simon N. B. Gunkel, and Maarten A. Hogervorst.

Publication venues where the scientist frequently appears include Frontiers in Psychology, ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, Preprints.org, AHFE International, and Frontiers in Neuroergonomics.

Alexander Toet has contributed a book titled Developments in Implicit Measurements published by Frontiers Media in 2022.

They were recognized as a SPIE Fellow in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Image fusion by a ratio of low-pass pyramid

    Alexander Toet

  • Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays

    Frank L. Kooi;Alexander Toet

  • Merging thermal and visual images by a contrast pyramid

    A. Toet;L. J. van Ruyven;J. M. Valeton

  • The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea.

    Alexander Toet;Dennis M. Levi

  • The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision.

    Frank L. Kooi;Alex Toet;Srimant P. Tripathy;Dennis M. Levi

  • Hierarchical image fusion

    Alexander Toet

  • A morphological pyramidal image decomposition

    Alexander Toet

  • The TNO Multiband Image Data Collection.

    Alexander Toet

  • Multiscale contrast enhancement with applications to image fusion

    Alexander Toet

  • New false color mapping for image fusion

    Alexander Toet;Jan Walraven

  • Computational versus Psychophysical Bottom-Up Image Saliency: A Comparative Evaluation Study

    A. Toet

  • Natural colour mapping for multiband nightvision imagery

    Alexander Toet

  • Fusion of visible and thermal imagery improves situational awareness

    Alexander Toet;Jan Kees IJspeert;Allen M. Waxman;Mario Aguilar

  • Perceptual evaluation of different image fusion schemes

    Alexander Toet;Eric M Franken

  • Progress in color night vision

    Alexander Toet;Maarten A. Hogervorst

  • Social touch in human–computer interaction

    Johannes Bernardus Fransiscus van Erp;Johannes Bernardus Fransiscus van Erp;Alexander Toet

  • Emotional Responses to Multisensory Environmental Stimuli: A Conceptual Framework and Literature Review.

    Eliane Schreuder;Johannes Bernardus Fransiscus van Erp;Alexander Toet;Victor L. Kallen

  • Methods for Evaluating Emotions Evoked by Food Experiences: A Literature Review.

    Daisuke Kaneko;Daisuke Kaneko;Alexander Toet;Anne Marie Brouwer;Victor Kallen

  • Graph morphology

    H. J. A. M. Heumans;P. Nacken;A. Toet;L. Vincent

  • Multiscale color image enhancement

    Alexander Toet

  • Fast natural color mapping for night-time imagery

    Maarten A. Hogervorst;Alexander Toet

  • A Neural Network Framework for Cognitive Bias.

    Johan E. Korteling;Anne-Marie Brouwer;Alexander Toet

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan B. F. van Erp
Jan B. F. van Erp University of Twente
Jan J. Koenderink
Jan J. Koenderink Delft University of Technology
Ignace T. C. Hooge
Ignace T. C. Hooge Utrecht University
David Bull
David Bull University of Bristol
David H. Foster
David H. Foster University of Manchester
Theo Gevers
Theo Gevers University of Amsterdam
Dennis M. Levi
Dennis M. Levi University of California, Berkeley
Peter Meer
Peter Meer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Monique A. M. Smeets
Monique A. M. Smeets Utrecht University
Dylan Marc Jones
Dylan Marc Jones Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, many of which are available through flexible online programs. One increasingly popular field is project leadership, and students often ask, is project management a good degree? This area equips graduates with essential organizational skills that are highly valued across industries.

Rapidly evolving sectors like blockchain have also seen a surge in remote learning. Numerous accredited institutions now offer specialized blockchain degree programs that focus on cryptocurrency, fintech, and advanced digital technologies.

Sports management is another exciting technology-driven career path. With the rise of virtual coursework, students can choose from the sports management programs online to gain industry-specific knowledge—from analytics to facility operations.

Urban development and planning roles are vital for smart city initiatives and sustainability. Those interested in shaping the spaces we live in can find the online degree urban planning options to be both accessible and affordable, making this field more approachable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Toet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles