World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alasdair M. Cook

Alasdair M. Cook

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
9143
World Ranking
12838
National Ranking
918

Alasdair M. Cook publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alasdair M. Cook sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Alasdair M. Cook D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alasdair M. Cook sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alasdair M. Cook is a researcher affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany. Their work is primarily situated within the domain of Environmental Science, with a focus on Environmental Chemistry and its applications. The research includes study areas such as Pollution and Environmental Chemistry, contributing to specialized knowledge in these subfields.

The main topics Cook addresses in their research include:

  • Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Cook has published at least one research paper, titled Sulfoquinovose metabolism in marine algae, which appeared in 2021 in the journal Botanica Marina. This paper has been cited multiple times, indicating a presence in the scientific discourse concerning marine environmental sciences.

Their frequent collaborators come from diverse backgrounds in environmental and marine sciences, including:

  • Sabine Scholz
  • Manuel Serif
  • David Schleheck
  • Martin Sayer
  • Frithjof C. Küpper

Cook's publications are concentrated in at least one venue known for marine and botanical research:

  • Botanica Marina

This concentration suggests a specialization in marine environmental processes and chemistry. The pathway of Cook's work integrates environmental chemistry with biological systems, notably marine algae metabolism pathways, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach that connects chemistry, biology, and environmental science.

Best Publications

  • s-Triazines as nitrogen sources for bacteria

    Alasdair M. Cook;Ralf Hütter

  • Transformation of tetrachloromethane to dichloromethane and carbon dioxide by Acetobacterium woodii.

    Christine Egli;Thomas Tschan;Rudolf Scholtz;Alasdair M. Cook

  • Anaerobic dechlorination of tetrachloromethane and 1,2-dichloroethane to degradable products by pure cultures of Desulfobacterium sp. and Methanobacterium sp.

    Christine Egli;Rudolf Scholtz;Alasdair M. Cook;Thomas Leisinger

  • Taurine reduction in anaerobic respiration of Bilophila wadsworthia RZATAU

    Heike Laue;Karin Denger;Alasdair M. Cook

  • Microbial desulfonation of substituted naphthalenesulfonic acids and benzenesulfonic acids.

    Daniel Zürrer;Alasdair M. Cook;Thomas Leisinger

  • Phosphonate utilization by bacteria

    Alasdair M. Cook;Christian G. Daughton;Martin Alexander

  • Microbial metabolism of sulfur- and phosphorus-containing xenobiotics

    Michael A. Kertesz;Alasdair M. Cook;Thomas Leisinger

  • Orthanilic Acid and Analogues as Carbon Sources for Bacteria: Growth Physiology and Enzymic Desulphonation

    Thomas Thurnheer;Thilo KöUHLER;Alasdair M. Cook;Thomas Leisinger

  • The degradative pathway of the s-triazine melamine. The steps to ring cleavage

    Kathrin Jutzi;Alasdair M. Cook;Ralf Hütter

  • Dichloromethane dehalogenase with improved catalytic activity isolated from a fast-growing dichloromethane-utilizing bacterium.

    Rudolf Scholtz;Lawrence P. Wackett;Christine Egli;Alasdair M. Cook

  • Ring cleavage and degradative pathway of cyanuric acid in bacteria.

    Alasdair M. Cook;Paul Beilstein;Hugo Grossenbacher;Ralf Hütter

  • Proteins induced by sulfate limitation in Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas putida, or Staphylococcus aureus.

    Michael A. Kertesz;Thomas Leisinger;Alasdair M. Cook

  • Transformation of tetra- and trichloromethane to CO2 by anaerobic bacteria is a non-enzymic process

    Christine Egli;Susanna A. Stromeyer;Alasdair M. Cook;Thomas Leisinger

  • Deethylsimazine: bacterial dechlorination, deamination, and complete degradation

    Alasdair M. Cook;Ralf Hütter

  • 4-Sulphobenzoate 3,4-dioxygenase. Purification and properties of a desulphonative two-component enzyme system from Comamonas testosteroni T-2.

    Hans H. Locher;Thomas Leisinger;Alasdair M. Cook

  • Sulphoglycolysis in Escherichia coli K-12 closes a gap in the biogeochemical sulphur cycle

    Karin Denger;Michael Weiss;Ann-Katrin Felux;Alexander Schneider

  • Parvibaculum lavamentivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel heterotroph that initiates catabolism of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate.

    David Schleheck;Brian J. Tindall;Ramón Rosselló-Mora;Alasdair M. Cook

  • Mineralization of Individual Congeners of Linear Alkylbenzenesulfonate by Defined Pairs of Heterotrophic Bacteria

    David Schleheck;Thomas P. Knepper;Karin Fischer;Alasdair M. Cook

  • The DUF81 protein TauE in Cupriavidus necator H16, a sulfite exporter in the metabolism of C2 sulfonates.

    Sonja Weinitschke;Karin Denger;Alasdair M. Cook;Theo H. M. Smits

  • Dissimilation of the C2 sulfonates.

    Alasdair M. Cook;Karin Denger

Frequent Co-Authors

Theo H. M. Smits
Theo H. M. Smits Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Martin Alexander
Martin Alexander Cornell University
Michael A. Kertesz
Michael A. Kertesz University of Sydney
Lynne Goodwin
Lynne Goodwin Los Alamos National Laboratory
Frithjof C. Küpper
Frithjof C. Küpper University of Aberdeen
Miriam Land
Miriam Land Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Hans G. Schlegel
Hans G. Schlegel University of Göttingen
Tanja Woyke
Tanja Woyke Joint Genome Institute
David Bruce
David Bruce Pebble Labs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can pave the way for diverse careers, especially with the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of online degrees. Many students explore healthcare-focused disciplines, including nutrition, medical imaging, and dietetics, to expand their job prospects or specialize their expertise.

Those with an interest in nutrition may want to investigate the cheapest online nutrition degree programs, which make advanced study more accessible without excessive financial burden. If hands-on healthcare appeals to you, accredited online sonography certificate programs allow you to enter the fast-growing field of ultrasound technology.

For those considering roles in diagnostic imaging, attending the best online radiology tech programs can be a strategic way to gain practical skills and credentials. Additionally, pursuing advanced roles as a registered dietitian is possible through reputable dietitian masters programs.

Each of these pathways leverages your background in biology or biochemistry, offering opportunities for meaningful, in-demand careers both in and beyond traditional laboratory settings.

Best Scientists Citing Alasdair M. Cook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles