| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 512 | 32 | 35 | 14 |
The discussions in Organizational psychology review mainly cover the fields of Social psychology, Industrial and organizational psychology, Applied psychology, Public relations and Knowledge management. The work on Social psychology tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Perception and Process (engineering). Organizational psychology review features Process (engineering) research that overlaps with concepts in Cognitive psychology.
The research on Industrial and organizational psychology tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Construct (philosophy), Organization development and Organizational learning. In it, Job performance and Team composition are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Applied psychology research. Organizational psychology review features Job performance research that overlaps with concepts in Job analysis.
The published papers mostly deal with topics like Social psychology, Perspective (graphical), Applied psychology, Cognitive psychology and Job performance. The most cited publications hold forums on Social psychology that merge themes from other disciplines such as Team process and Task (project management). Issues in Cognitive psychology were discussed in the journal publications, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Generative grammar, Interpersonal process, Sensemaking and Process (engineering).
The main points discussed in Organizational psychology review deals with Cognitive psychology, Knowledge management, Social psychology, Social identity theory and Field research. While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Cognitive psychology, it also covered topics in Mindfulness, Personality and Negotiation. The journal explores topics in Knowledge management which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Selection (genetic algorithm) and Historiometry.
It explores Social psychology concepts, specifically Social identity approach and Group dynamic but expands to research in Cohesion (linguistics) and Antecedent (grammar). In addition to Social identity theory research, it aims to explore topics under Social psychology (sociology), Organizational identification and Cognitive reframing. The journal addresses concerns in Field research which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Engineering ethics, Field (Bourdieu), Best practice and Operational readiness.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Organizational psychology review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Organizational psychology review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 14.29% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 50.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.33% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 25.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
An exciting and growing application of Organizational Psychology lies in the on-going enhancement of Forensic Science institutions. Employing the intricate understandings of Social, Industrial and Applied psychology discussed in previous Organizational psychology review articles plays a critical role in this development. The explanatory capabilities of Organizational Psychology provide unique insights into work cultures, team dynamics, and individual performances within Forensic Science, contributing to better work outcomes, improved job satisfaction, and overall institutional optimization. For instance, insights from Social Psychology can be used to bolster team dynamics within Forensic Science labs, aiding the creation of strong, supportive cultures that promote open communication, learning, and high performance. Industrial and organizational psychological principles can also be used to shape better recruitment, selection, and training procedures, ensuring that individuals with the right skill sets and mindsets are brought into these institutions. Additionally, applied psychological strategies can foster a better understanding of job performance and job analysis within these settings, paving the way for improved performance reviews and subsequently employee satisfaction and output. For those who are passionate about integrating Organizational Psychology with Forensic Science practices and intend to make a career within this domain, understanding these linkages is crucial. To know more on the specifics of pursuing a career in this field, check out our comprehensive guide on how to become a forensic scientist in Colorado. Overall, the intersection of Organizational Psychology and Forensic Science creates a dynamic and significant area of study that holds potential for further research and practical implications, increasing the scope of both disciplines.
Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck;Joshua L. Howard;Yves Van Vaerenbergh;Hannes Leroy
(2021)Niklas K. Steffens;Katie A. Munt;Daan van Knippenberg;Michael J. Platow
(2021)Maria Tims;Sharon K. Parker
(2020)Rebecca Grossman;Kevin Nolan;Zachary Rosch;David Mazer
(2021)Daan van Knippenberg
(2020)Tina Urbach;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Doris Fay;Sharon K. Parker
(2021)Exploring psychology careers in the USA often begins with selecting the right educational path. For those mindful of expenses, finding the cheapest psychology degree online can make earning a degree more accessible and reduce financial stress.
Beyond psychology, related fields such as social work offer rewarding career opportunities. Aspiring social workers might consider programs that are easier to get into, like the msw programs, providing a smoother pathway into this essential profession.
For clinical practice and advanced qualifications, the availability of flexible psyd programs online enable students to balance studies with professional responsibilities while preparing for licensure as psychologists.
Marriage and family therapy is another specialized field gaining popularity. Those seeking quicker routes to certification might explore the mft program options that offer accelerated timelines without compromising quality.
Choosing the right online degree in psychology or related disciplines depends on career goals, affordability, and program flexibility, making these options vital resources for informed decision-making.
