0022-3549
Published by: Elsevier
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-pharmaceutical-sciences
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 253 | 158 | 282 | 29 |
| Medicine | 1715 | 51 | 71 | 15 |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences primarily focuses on research topics in Chromatography, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Organic chemistry and Stereochemistry. Topics in Chromatography were tackled in line with various other fields like Urine, Aqueous solution and Solubility. The study on Aqueous solution presented in it intersects with the topics under Inorganic chemistry.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences explores research in Solubility and the adjacent study of Dissolution. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences connects the study in Pharmacology with the closely related area of In vivo. Many of the studies tackled connect In vivo with a similar field of study like In vitro.
Pharmacokinetics research presented falls under the umbrella topic of Internal medicine.
The main points discussed in the most cited articles deal with Chromatography, Pharmacology, Solubility, Dosage form and Pharmacokinetics. While the journal papers focused on Chromatography, they were also able to explore topics like Permeation, Pulmonary surfactant, Aqueous solution and Particle size. The most cited publications address concerns in the field of Pharmacology by exploring it in line with topics in In vivo which intersect with In vitro subjects.
The concepts of Pharmacology, Chromatography, Pharmacokinetics, Drug and Drug delivery are tackled in the journal. Oral administration is a major topic of Pharmacology research presented in the journal. Most of the Chromatography studies addressed also intersect with Solubility.
While Pharmacokinetics is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Bioavailability and In vivo. The research on In vivo discussed in the journal draws on the closely related field of In vitro.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.18% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 11.68% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 9.98% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.99% of all publications and 61.36% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Daan J.A. Crommelin;Thomas J. Anchordoquy;David B. Volkin;Wim Jiskoot
(2021)Can Wei;Nayan G. Solanki;Jaydip M. Vasoya;Ankita V. Shah
(2020)Daisuke Kuroda;Kouhei Tsumoto
(2020)Georgios K. Eleftheriadis;Paraskevi Kyriaki Monou;Nikolaos Bouropoulos;Johan Boetker
(2020)Nicholas R. Larson;Yangjie Wei;Indira Prajapati;Aishik Chakraborty
(2020)Wim Jiskoot;Andrea Hawe;Tim Menzen;David B. Volkin
(2021)Thorsteinn Loftsson
(2021)Antonio Lopalco;Angela A. Lopedota;Valentino Laquintana;Nunzio Denora
(2020)For those interested in healthcare but not pursuing a traditional medical degree, several related online programs offer viable and rewarding career options. Programs in medical billing and coding, for instance, provide a foundation for a critical behind-the-scenes role in healthcare administration. Many accredited medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid make these fields more accessible to students seeking flexible learning formats.
Additionally, biology majors have promising prospects beyond medical school. There are numerous high paying jobs with a biology degree that leverage strong scientific backgrounds in various industries including pharmaceuticals, research, and healthcare technology.
Within medical coding specifically, earning certifications such as the CPC (Certified Professional Coder) or CCS (Certified Coding Specialist) can significantly influence career progression and salary potential. Understanding the differences in ccs vs cpc salary is crucial for making an informed decision about which certification aligns best with your career goals.
Overall, the what is medical coding salary topic remains a key consideration for many pursuing this career path, as salary ranges reflect experience, certification, and location. These related online degrees and pathways offer flexible, rewarding alternatives or stepping stones toward a career in medicine.
