| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 119 | 11 | 29 | 9 |
| Genetics | 170 | 6 | 12 | 2 |
| Medicine | 2574 | 25 | 26 | 9 |
The objective of Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis is to combine knowledge in the areas of Molecular biology, Genetics, Genotoxicity, Mutagen and Biochemistry. In Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, DNA, DNA damage and Mutation, Gene, Mutant are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Molecular biology research. The research on DNA damage featured in the journal combines topics in other fields like Oxidative stress and DNA repair.
It aims to address concerns in Genetics, specifically in the areas of Mutagenesis (molecular biology technique), Gene mutation, Chromosome, Sister chromatid exchange and Mutation (genetic algorithm). While Genotoxicity is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Toxicology, Micronucleus, Micronucleus test and In vivo. The Micronucleus test works featured in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis incorporate elements from Andrology, Immunology, Lymphocyte and Pharmacology.
Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis holds forums on In vivo that merges themes from other disciplines such as In vitro and Bone marrow. Research in Mutagen discussed is concerned with the study of Carcinogen as a whole. The journal explores research in Biochemistry and the adjacent study of Ames test.
The most cited publications mainly deal with areas of study such as Molecular biology, Genetics, Genotoxicity, DNA damage and Biochemistry. The journal papers focus on Molecular biology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Cell culture, Mutation, Mutant, DNA and In vivo. The most cited publications facilitate discussions on Genotoxicity that incorporate concepts from other fields like Mutagen, Carcinogen, Toxicology and Micronucleus, Micronucleus test.
The foci of Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis are Genotoxicity, DNA damage, Molecular biology, Internal medicine and In vivo. Genotoxicity research featured in the journal incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Pollutant, Apoptosis, Micronucleus, Casein and Pharmacology. DNA damage research presented in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis encompasses a variety of subjects, including Inflammation, Cancer research, Flow cytometry and DNA repair.
Issues in Molecular biology were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like In vitro and Restriction enzyme, Gene, Mitochondrial DNA, Endonuclease. While the primary focus in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis is In vivo, it also dissects topics surrounding Ames test and Chromatography, Anthraquinones, Anthraquinone and Solubility as a whole. The journal covers DNA research under the subject of Genetics.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.82% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.95% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 9.76% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.63% of all publications and 53.66% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Robert H Heflich;George E Johnson;Andreas Zeller;Francesco Marchetti
(2020)Jennifer C Sasaki;Ashley Allemang;Steven M Bryce;Laura Custer
(2020)Wentao Li;Aziz Sancar
(2020)Md. Kawsar Mustofa;Yuki Tanoue;Chie Tateishi;Cyrus Vaziri
(2020)Catalina Pereira;Marcus B. Smolka;Robert S. Weiss;Miguel A. Brieño‐Enríquez
(2020)Yiying Wang;Roberta A Mittelstaedt;Rebecca Wynne;Ying Chen
(2021)Bala Bhaskar Gollapudi;Steave Su;Abby A Li;George E Johnson
(2020)Altaf H. Sarker;Kelly S. Trego;Weiguo Zhang;Peyton Jacob
(2020)Maria Grazia Andreassi;Andrea Borghini;Cecilia Vecoli;Emanuela Piccaluga
(2020)For those interested in healthcare but looking for alternatives to traditional medical school, there are several valuable online degree options that can lead to fulfilling careers. For example, becoming a nurse practitioner is a popular pathway, with programs designed to accelerate the process. Understanding how long to become a nurse practitioner can help prospective students plan their education efficiently.
Many registered nurses seek to advance their qualifications through shorter programs like a 6 month rn to bsn program, which allows them to quickly earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. From there, bridge programs such as the adn to np pathway provide a streamlined route to becoming a Nurse Practitioner, often with specialization options.
Salary prospects also vary by specialization and location. For instance, those focusing on mental health can explore careers as a psychiatric nurse practitioner, where knowing the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary by state is crucial for making informed career decisions.
Overall, these pathways offer flexible, online-based opportunities that complement traditional medical education, providing diverse options for students committed to healthcare careers.
