| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 2014 | 161 | 197 | 12 |
The journal investigates studies in Surgery, Internal medicine, Radiology, Rare disease and Pathology. The in-depth study on Surgery also explores topics in the intersecting field of Differential diagnosis. The journal focuses on Internal medicine but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Cardiology.
Radiology study tackled is connected to the field of Lesion.
The journal papers cover a variety of subjects, including Surgery, Internal medicine, Rare disease, Pathology and Pediatrics. While the most cited articles focused on Surgery, they were also able to explore topics like Differential diagnosis, Anesthesia and Radiology. The studies on Internal medicine discussed at the journal papers can also contribute to research in the domains of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Immunology and Cardiology.
The journal tackles a plethora of topics, such as Internal medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Cardiology and Pediatrics. Internal medicine and Gastroenterology are closely related fields of research discussed in Case Reports. The journal aims to address concerns in Surgery, specifically in the areas of Complication, Orthopedic surgery and Presentation (obstetrics).
Radiology research is concerned with Biopsy in particular. The majority of Cardiology studies presented zero in on Myocardial infarction.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Case Reports (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Case Reports (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 20.83% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.07% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.74% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 10.79% of all publications and 66.40% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Another aspect to consider when analyzing the depth of research and academic papers provided in the journal is the connection of the authors to esteemed educational institutions. Such connections can add weight to the discussions presented in the journal and provide avenues for direct educational influence and knowledge transfer. For instance, in the field of medicine, specifically nursing, having contributors who are also active educators or professionals from recognized nursing schools can greatly enhance the journal's value. This allows the publication to offer perspectives that are not only theoretically sound, but are also grounded in actual practice and experience. An interesting parallel to draw would be evaluations of nursing school programs themselves, such as a comprehensive analysis of the best nursing schools in New Mexico. A study like this offers a direct look at the institutions that shape many of the professionals conducting significant research in the field of medical sciences, much like many of the contributors to our journal. These aspects can provide insightful context when understanding the backgrounds of the authors and their unique perspectives. However, it's worth mentioning that these insights are merely complementary to the objective assessments of the journal's research quality. Ultimately, the scholarly value of the publications comes from their scientific rigor, innovative input, and contribution to the field. By recognizing these connections, readers are better informed about the authorship ecosystem and can understand the potential influences that shape the discussions at play.
Angela Lee;Alexander N Wein;Maria B Majella Doyle;William C Chapman
(2021)Manuel Alfredo Podestà;Barbara Ruggiero;Giuseppe Remuzzi;Piero Ruggenenti
(2020)Taha Ahmed;Samra Haroon Lodhi;Samir Kapadia;Gautam V Shah
(2020)Malin-Theres Seffer;Gabriele Eden;Susanne Engelmann;Jan T Kielstein
(2020)Florent Artru;Lorenzo Alberio;Darius Moradpour;Grégoire Stalder
(2020)Mee-Young Lee;Carolina Bernabe-Ramirez;Daniel C Ramirez;Robert G Maki
(2020)Collin Turbyne;Pelle de Koning;Jasper Zantvoord;Damiaan Denys
(2021)Kieran Murray;Achilleas Floudas;Ciara Murray;Aurelie Fabre
(2021)Daniel Wiseman;John Lin;Jean-Pierre Routy;Gordan Samoukovic
(2021)For those interested in expanding their healthcare knowledge and career opportunities after studying Medicine in the USA, several online degree options are worth considering. For individuals without a nursing background aiming to enter advanced nursing roles, exploring direct entry MSN programs for non-nurses online can be a strategic choice. These programs bridge the gap efficiently for non-nurses to pursue master's-level nursing qualifications.
Registered Nurses looking to advance their education often compare pathways such as capella university vs wgu rn to bsn programs. Understanding the differences in curriculum, flexibility, and cost helps prospective students select the best fit for their career goals.
Additionally, pursuing affordable bsn to msn online programs is an excellent way for nurses to deepen their expertise and qualify for leadership or specialized roles without interrupting their careers.
For those seeking flexibility, some top rn to bsn without clinicals programs offer online coursework that reduces the need for traditional clinical hours, fitting well with busy schedules and remote learners.