| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 718 | 12 | 12 | 3 |
The journal facilitates discussions on Forestry, Agroforestry, Botany, Agronomy and Ecology. The work on Forestry tackled in Australian Forestry brings together disciplines like Eucalyptus, Sowing and Pinus radiata. The Agroforestry research dealing mostly with Silviculture is the focus of it.
Botany and Horticulture are closely related fields of research discussed in Australian Forestry. Agronomy research discussed connects with the study of Soil water. The research on Forest management discussed in Australian Forestry draws on the closely related field of Environmental resource management.
The journal articles focus on Forestry, Ecology, Agroforestry, Botany and Eucalyptus. The published papers dive deep in exploring the relationship between the study of Forestry and Litter. The journal publications hold forums on Botany that merge themes from other disciplines such as Provenance and Horticulture.
The main research concerns discussed in Australian Forestry are Agronomy, Forestry, Subtropics, Eucalyptus and Bioenergy. In Australian Forestry, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Scale (ratio) and Cutting are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Agronomy research. It explores topics in Forestry which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Social attitudes, Hardwood and Habitat.
The research on Eucalyptus tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Tropical australia and Pulp and paper industry. It deals with Bioenergy in conjunction with Eucalyptus spp and similar fields in Agroforestry. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Agroforestry, it also covered topics in Traditional knowledge, Logging, Psychological resilience and Scale (social sciences).
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Australian Forestry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Australian Forestry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 22.73% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 52.94% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 5.88% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 29.41% of all publications and 11.76% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
S. Hislop;C. Stone;A. Haywood;A. Skidmore
(2020)H Nickolas;D Williams;G Downes;PA Harrison
(2020)A. P. O’Grady;G. S. Smith;F. Ascui;E. A. Pinkard
(2020)R. J. Keenan;P. Kanowski;P. J. Baker;C. Brack
(2021)For students interested in Plant Science and Agronomy, there are several related fields where online degrees can open doors to dynamic careers. While exploring options in biological sciences, many find parallels in healthcare education pathways, such as the rn to nurse practitioner programs. These programs offer accelerated routes for healthcare professionals that mirror the efficiency and specialization found in agronomy studies.
Similarly, online learning platforms provide flexible options like the online direct entry msn programs, designed for those making career transitions. This flexibility is crucial for students balancing work, study, and research, much like those pursuing agronomy degrees who may be involved in fieldwork or lab research.
When comparing program quality and outcomes, options such as capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn provide valuable insights into curriculum design and student support services. Understanding these factors can help prospective students evaluate similar online degree choices in plant sciences or related disciplines.
Finally, interdisciplinary careers like becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner highlight how specialized knowledge can lead to unique professional roles. Plant Science graduates interested in sustainability and health may find cross-disciplinary opportunities in such innovative fields.
