| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 1133 | 8 | 9 | 4 |
The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Medical education, Anatomy, Curriculum, Gross anatomy and Teaching method. In addition to Medical education research, Anatomical Sciences Education aims to explore topics under Perception, Educational measurement, Likert scale, Dissection and Anatomy education. Dissection research is the primary subject tackled in it with a focus on Prosection.
It features Anatomy education research that overlaps with concepts in MEDLINE. Topics in Anatomy explored in Anatomical Sciences Education were investigated in conjunction with research in Test (assessment), Spatial ability, Cognition, Knowledge level and Association (psychology). The concepts on Curriculum presented in Anatomical Sciences Education can also apply to other research fields, including Health care, Program evaluation, Comprehension and Problem-based learning.
Physical therapy and Medical physics are some topics wherein Gross anatomy research discussed in the journal have an impact. While Teaching method is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Computer-Assisted Instruction, Educational technology and Active learning.
The main points discussed in the journal publications deal with Medical education, Anatomy, Teaching method, Curriculum and Gross anatomy. Prosection, Active learning, Program evaluation and Educational measurement are some topics wherein Medical education research discussed in the most cited publications has an impact. While Curriculum is the key highlight in the most cited publications, thet also covered some subjects on Mathematics education and Cognitive style and Likert scale.
The objective of Anatomical Sciences Education is to combine knowledge in the areas of Anatomy, Medical education, Curriculum, Anatomy education and Gross anatomy. Concepts in Test (assessment), as well as related topics in Spatial ability, are covered in the Anatomy research presented in Anatomical Sciences Education. While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Medical education, it also covered topics in Context (language use), Perception, MEDLINE, Multiple choice and Occupational therapy.
Topics in Curriculum were tackled in line with various other fields like Visualization, Higher education and Anatomical science. It explores topics in Anatomy education which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Pleasure and Engineering ethics. The journal focuses on Gross anatomy but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Likert scale, Medical physics and Dissection.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Anatomical Sciences Education (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Anatomical Sciences Education (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.37% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 17.36% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.81% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 20.83% of all publications and 50.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Marijn Zilverschoon;Eugene J. Custers;Olle ten Cate;Cas L. J. J. Kruitwagen
(2021)Anna T Ryan;Tim J Wilkinson
(2021)Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can lead to various rewarding career options, many of which offer flexible online learning opportunities. For those interested in advancing in social work, there are affordable options available as evidenced by the online dsw programs that provide doctoral-level education designed for busy professionals.
Speech pathology is another promising field, and aspiring specialists may wonder, can you get a speech pathology degree online? The answer is yes, with many accredited programs offering flexible online pathways suitable for a range of learners.
Legal support roles are also accessible through digital education. Those looking to enter the legal field without attending traditional law school might consider earning a paralegal certificate online, offering affordable and streamlined education options that lead directly to the job market.
Lastly, careers in applied behavior analysis are growing, with many online options such as bcba programs providing accessible paths for certification and career advancement. These programs cater to those passionate about making a difference through behavioral science.
