American Journal of Bioethics

Top Research Topics at American Journal of Bioethics?

The foci of American Journal of Bioethics are MEDLINE, Bioethics, Social psychology, Law and Engineering ethics. It facilitates discussions on MEDLINE that incorporate concepts from other fields like Family medicine, Nursing and Informed consent. It features Nursing research that overlaps with concepts in Health care.

In the journal, Environmental ethics and Social science are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Bioethics research. The majority of Engineering ethics studies presented zero in on Research ethics.

• MEDLINE (16.93%)
• Bioethics (13.59%)
• Social psychology (10.94%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. (327 citations)
• All Gifts Large and Small: Toward an Understanding of the Ethics of Pharmaceutical Industry Gift-Giving (277 citations)
• Justice, Health, and Healthcare (273 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at American Journal of Bioethics:

The main points discussed in the journal papers deal with Social psychology, Informed consent, Bioethics, Law and Research ethics. The Informed consent research tackled in the published papers is interrelated with MEDLINE which concerns subjects like Family medicine and Psychiatry. The published papers facilitate discussions on Bioethics that incorporate concepts from other fields like Environmental ethics and Health care, Ethics Consultation.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Law
• World War II
• Internal medicine

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The main research concerns discussed in American Journal of Bioethics are Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Bioethics, MEDLINE, Racism and 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak. American Journal of Bioethics focuses on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Public health and Public relations. The concepts on Public health presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Contingency, Neutrality, State (polity) and Perfectionism (philosophy).

Engineering ethics, Environmental ethics, Power (social and political), Epistemology and Field (Bourdieu) are some topics wherein Bioethics research discussed in it have an impact. The close relationship between Health care and Nursing is one of the points of interest dissected in MEDLINE research. It addresses concerns in Racism which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Health equity, Criminology and Race (biology).

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Race, Power, and COVID-19: A Call for Advocacy within Bioethics. (20 citations)
• Racial Justice Requires Ending the War on Drugs. (17 citations)
• Structural Racism in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moving Forward. (17 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in American Journal of Bioethics (based on the number of publications) are:

• Benjamin S. Wilfond (57 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• David Magnus (43 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Matthew K. Wynia (39 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Rosamond Rhodes (35 papers) absent at the last edition,
• David B. Resnik (34 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in American Journal of Bioethics (based on the number of publications) are:

• National Institutes of Health (170 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Pennsylvania (169 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 8 less than at the previous edition,
• Stanford University (152 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Washington (143 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Harvard University (139 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 4.56% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 25.74% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.62% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 20.96% of all publications and 46.69% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Opportunities for Experts in Bioethics Research

Another aspect worth considering while understanding the intricacies of Bioethics research, is the prospective career opportunities that open up for experts in this field. It is relevant to note that the knowledge and experience gathered from the studies published in 'American Journal of Bioethics' can be an added advantage for those aiming to pursue their careers as licensed professional counselors (LPC) or in a related field. Such professionals can utilize their expertise in bioethics to provide ethically sound counseling services to their clients. A career as an LPC also plays a pivotal role within the healthcare system by providing support and promoting mental health wellness. To be professionally qualified, the path for becoming a Licensed professional counselor can be pursued. You can learn more about it by referring to this detailed guide on how to obtain an LPC license in New Hampshire. Moreover, professionals with an understanding of bioethics can serve in numerous other capacities such as medical ethics consultants, healthcare administrators, institutional ethics committee members, and bioethics professors, to name a few. These roles allow such professionals to put their knowledge and skills into practice, influence policy and decision-making in healthcare, as well as contribute to the theoretical body of knowledge within bioethics. Therefore, the study of bioethics not only enriches one's understanding of the complex ethical issues within healthcare and research but also provides them with a multitude of career possibilities to explore.