International Cryptology Conference (CRYPTO)

The ranking presented on this page offers a comprehensive evaluation of scientific conferences within the field of Mathematics. Developed by Research.com, a respected authority in science research since 2014, this listing is grounded in the site’s longstanding commitment to delivering trusted and robust data on scientific achievements across all major research disciplines, including Mathematics.

Each conference’s position in the ranking is determined by a distinctive bibliometric score, meticulously crafted by Research.com. This score is calculated using a combination of the estimated h-index and the number of distinguished scientists who have participated at the conference over the past three years. The Impact Score values that inform this ranking were gathered as of 2024-11-27 to provide the most current and relevant insights into conference impact.

The ranking process entailed an exhaustive review of over 913 conferences, with inclusion criteria based on a detailed and rigorous examination of more than 487 scholarly documents published during the past three years. The analysis incorporated the contributions of 3,535 leading and widely recognized scientists in Mathematics, ensuring that the assessment reflects both the quality and the breadth of research presented at each event.

For those interested in the specifics of the analytical framework and selection criteria, a thorough explanation of the methodologies employed in computing the ranking scores is available on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Cryptology Conference (based on the number of publications) are:

• Ivan Damgård (60 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Amit Sahai (54 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Rafail Ostrovsky (53 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Mihir Bellare (49 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Yuval Ishai (47 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Cryptology Conference (based on the number of publications) are:

• IBM (147 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology (145 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Weizmann Institute of Science (106 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (102 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
• Aarhus University (99 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.31% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 27.10% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 16.82% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 28.04% of all publications and 28.04% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.