Annual Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI)

The ranking presented on this page provides an authoritative listing of scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science, offering valuable insights for researchers, academics, and professionals seeking the most impactful venues for disseminating their work. This ranking has been meticulously prepared by Research.com, a leading platform recognized for delivering trusted and rigorously curated data on scientific contributions across all major research fields, including Computer Science, since 2014.

The evaluation and positioning of conferences within this ranking are based on a unique bibliometric score crafted by Research.com. This score is derived through a sophisticated assessment of both the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have participated in these conferences over the preceding three years. This dual-criteria approach ensures a comprehensive appraisal of each event’s scientific influence and relevance within the community.

Impact Score values for the conferences have been compiled as of 2024-11-27, reflecting the most current and reliable data available. The robust analysis underpinning this ranking involved the examination of more than 2,742 conferences, which were carefully selected following an exhaustive review of over 148,739 scientific documents published during the last three years. These documents were contributed by 13,184 distinguished and influential scientists specializing in Computer Science, ensuring both depth and accuracy in representation.

This rigorous and expert-driven process underscores the credibility and relevance of the ranking, making it a valuable resource for anyone seeking to identify leading scientific conferences in the field. For comprehensive information on the methodology used to compute the ranking scores and the underlying principles guiding this evaluation, please refer to our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Intelligent User Interfaces (based on the number of publications) are:

• Tsvi Kuflik (20 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Wai-Tat Fu (17 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Michelle X. Zhou (17 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Peter Brusilovsky (16 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Jalal Mahmud (13 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Intelligent User Interfaces (based on the number of publications) are:

• IBM (82 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Southern California (33 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Haifa (32 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign (31 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (28 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2019 edition, 4.35% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 22.08% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 12.34% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.18% of all publications and 47.40% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.