World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
15736
World Ranking
5177
National Ranking
2444

William E. Narrow publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Narrow sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 79 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

William E. Narrow D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Narrow sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Narrow is affiliated with the American Psychological Association in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Health Professions, Psychology, and Medicine, with a strong focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Philosophy, and Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly work addresses a range of topics centered on Mental Health and Psychiatry, Health Policy Implementation Science, and Health Systems including Economic Evaluations and Quality of Life. They have also contributed to the understanding of Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, as well as the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare.

Recent publications by William E. Narrow include the following:

  • "Provider perceived barriers and facilitators to integrating routine outcome monitoring into practice in an urban community psychiatry clinic: A mixed-methods quality improvement project," 2020, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
  • "State of the Science: The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)," 2024, Behavior Therapy
  • "Determinants of experience & satisfaction in telehealth psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients & providers," 2023, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Editorial: The Enigma of "Real World" Mental Health Care," 2022, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

William E. Narrow has frequently published in journals such as:

  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Michael J. Van Wert
  • Mansoor Malik
  • Brenda Memel
  • Ryan Moore
  • Daniel L. Buccino

Best Publications

  • The de Facto US Mental and Addictive Disorders Service System: Epidemiologic Catchment Area Prospective 1-Year Prevalence Rates of Disorders and Services

    Darrel A. Regier;William E. Narrow;Donald S. Rae;Ronald W. Manderscheid

  • DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses

    Darrel A. Regier;William E. Narrow;Diana E. Clarke;Helena C. Kraemer

  • Revised Prevalence Estimates of Mental Disorders in the United States: Using a Clinical Significance Criterion to Reconcile 2 Surveys' Estimates

    William E. Narrow;Donald S. Rae;Lee N. Robins;Darrel A. Regier

  • Mental health service use in the community and schools: Results from the four-community MECA study

    Philip J. Leaf;Margarita Alegria;Patricia Cohen;Sherryl H. Goodman

  • Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC):

    Lee Anna Clark;Bruce Cuthbert;Roberto Lewis-Fernández;William E. Narrow

  • Prevalence of anxiety disorders and their comorbidity with mood and addictive disorders

    Darrel A. Regier;Donald S. Rae;William E. Narrow;Charles T. Kaelber

  • Use of Services by Persons With Mental and Addictive Disorders: Findings From the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program

    William E. Narrow;Darrel A. Regier;Donald S. Rae;Ronald W. Manderscheid

  • The Conceptual Development of DSM-V

    M.P.H. Darrel A. Regier;M.P.H. William E. Narrow;Emily A. Kuhl;David J. Kupfer

  • DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: Development and Reliability Testing of a Cross-Cutting Symptom Assessment for DSM-5

    William E. Narrow;Diana E. Clarke;S. Janet Kuramoto;Helena C. Kraemer

  • Depressive and disruptive disorders and mental health service utilization in children and adolescents.

    Ping Wu;Christina W. Hoven;Hector R. Bird;Robert E. Moore

  • The DISC Predictive Scales (DPS): efficiently screening for diagnoses.

    Christopher P. Lucas;Haiying Zhang;Prudence W. Fisher;David Shaffer

  • The epidemiology of anxiety disorders: the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) experience.

    Darrel A. Regier;William E. Narrow;Donald S. Rae

  • Correlates of unmet need for mental health services by children and adolescents

    A. J. Flisher;R. A. Kramer;R. C. Grosser;M. Alegria

  • The Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA): Adult and child reports

    Arlene Rubin Stiffman;Sarah McCUE Horwitz;Kimberly Hoagwood;Wilson Compton

  • The NIMH methods for the epidemiology of child and adolescent mental disorders (MECA) study: Background and methodology

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Elaine W. Flagg;Hector R. Bird;Mary E. Schwab-Stone

  • Estimating the prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adults from the epidemiologic catchment area survey

    K H Bourdon;D S Rae;B Z Locke;W E Narrow

  • Representativeness of clinical samples of youths with mental disorders: a preliminary population-based study.

    Sherryl H. Goodman;Benjamin B. Lahey;Brooke Fielding;Mina Dulcan

  • Childhood Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder in the NIMH MECA Study: Parent Versus Child Identification of Cases

    Judith L Rapoport;Gale Inoff-Germain;Myrna M Weissman;Steven Greenwald

  • Measurement of risk for mental disorders and competence in a psychiatric epidemiologic community survey: the National Institute of Mental Health Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study.

    S. H. Goodman;C. W. Hoven;W. E. Narrow;P. Cohen

  • DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part I: Study Design, Sampling Strategy, Implementation, and Analytic Approaches

    Diana E. Clarke;William E. Narrow;Darrel A. Regier;S. Janet Kuramoto

  • Mental health service use by Americans with severe mental illnesses.

    W. E. Narrow;D. A. Regier;G. Norquist;D. S. Rae

Frequent Co-Authors

Darrel A. Regier
Darrel A. Regier University of British Columbia
Donald S. Rae
Donald S. Rae American Psychological Association
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
Sherryl H. Goodman
Sherryl H. Goodman Emory University
Joshua E. Wilk
Joshua E. Wilk Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Christina W. Hoven
Christina W. Hoven Columbia University
David J. Kupfer
David J. Kupfer University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Maritza Rubio-Stipec
Maritza Rubio-Stipec University of Puerto Rico
Benjamin B. Lahey
Benjamin B. Lahey University of Chicago
Hector R. Bird
Hector R. Bird Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA often leads to diverse career paths in mental health, social services, research, and education. Choosing the right degree is crucial, and online learning offers flexibility for students with various life commitments.

Many students opt for an online degree in psychology to build foundational knowledge in human behavior. This is an ideal starting point for those interested in counseling, education, or community services.

For those passionate about direct social work and advocacy, an msw online (Master of Social Work) program is a popular pathway, preparing graduates for licensed practice and leadership roles. Students who want to focus on clinical practice and mental health assessment can explore an online psyd program, paving the way for psychologist careers.

Those interested in relationship counseling and family therapy can consider mft online programs, which train graduates to support couples and families through evidence-based therapeutic approaches.

Each of these online degrees opens the door to specialized roles within the social sciences and humanities, offering flexibility and accessibility for students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Narrow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles