World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
5390
World Ranking
2373
National Ranking
14

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
5901
World Ranking
7384
National Ranking
48

Ville Kolehmainen publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ville Kolehmainen sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 122 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ville Kolehmainen D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ville Kolehmainen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ville Kolehmainen is affiliated with the University of Eastern Finland in Finland. Their research spans the fields of Engineering and Medicine, with a particular focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Geophysics, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods, Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques, Flow Measurement and Analysis, and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • J. Toivanen
  • Marko Vauhkonen
  • Matti Hanhela
  • Antti Lipponen
  • A. Hänninen

Common venues for their published research comprise:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Inverse Problems and Imaging
  • Journal of Imaging
  • Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

Selected recent papers include:

  • Nonstationary Image Reconstruction in Ultrasonic Transmission Tomography Using Kalman Filter and Dimension Reduction, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
  • Deep-learning-based post-process correction of the aerosol parameters in the high-resolution Sentinel-3 Level-2 Synergy product, 2022, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Joint Reconstruction of Conductivity and Velocity in Two-Phase Flows Using Electromagnetic Flow Tomography and Electrical Tomography: A Simulation Study, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
  • OMEGA-open-source emission tomography software, 2021, Physics in Medicine and Biology
  • Model-enforced post-process correction of satellite aerosol retrievals, 2021, Atmospheric measurement techniques

Best Publications

  • Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography

    Jari P Kaipio;Ville Kolehmainen;Erkki Somersalo;Marko Vauhkonen

  • Inverse problems with structural prior information

    J P Kaipio;V Kolehmainen;M Vauhkonen;E Somersalo

  • Approximation errors and model reduction with an application in optical diffusion tomography

    S R Arridge;J P Kaipio;V Kolehmainen;M Schweiger

  • Statistical inversion for medical x-ray tomography with few radiographs: I. General theory

    S Siltanen;V Kolehmainen;S Järvenpää;J P Kaipio

  • Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns.

    V Kolehmainen;M Vauhkonen;P A Karjalainen;J P Kaipio

  • RECOVERY OF REGION BOUNDARIES OF PIECEWISE CONSTANT COEFFICIENTS OF AN ELLIPTIC PDE FROM BOUNDARY DATA

    V Kolehmainen;S R Arridge;W R B Lionheart;M Vauhkonen

  • Compensation of Modelling Errors Due to Unknown Domain Boundary in Electrical Impedance Tomography

    A Nissinen;V P Kolehmainen;J P Kaipio

  • Coupled radiative transfer equation and diffusion approximation model for photon migration in turbid medium with low-scattering and non-scattering regions.

    Tanja Tarvainen;Marko Vauhkonen;Ville Kolehmainen;Simon R Arridge

  • Statistical inversion for medical x-ray tomography with few radiographs: II. Application to dental radiology.

    V. Kolehmainen;S. Siltanen;Seppo Järvenpää;J. Kaipio

  • Dynamic Physiological Modeling for Functional Diffuse Optical Tomography

    Solomon Gilbert Diamond;Theodore J. Huppert;Ville Kolehmainen;Maria Angela Franceschini

  • Time-series estimation of biological factors in optical diffusion tomography

    Simon Prince;Ville Kolehmainen;Jari P Kaipio;Maria Angela Franceschini;Maria Angela Franceschini

  • Compensation of errors due to discretization, domain truncation and unknown contact impedances in electrical impedance tomography

    A Nissinen;L M Heikkinen;V Kolehmainen;J P Kaipio

  • PET Reconstruction With an Anatomical MRI Prior Using Parallel Level Sets

    Matthias J. Ehrhardt;Pawel Markiewicz;Maria Liljeroth;Anna Barnes

  • Hybrid radiative-transfer-diffusion model for optical tomography.

    Tanja Tarvainen;Marko Vauhkonen;Ville Kolehmainen;Jari P. Kaipio

  • Three-dimensional reconstruction of shape and piecewise constant region values for optical tomography using spherical harmonic parametrization and a boundary element method

    Athanasios D Zacharopoulos;Simon R Arridge;Oliver Dorn;Ville Kolehmainen

  • Finite element model for the coupled radiative transfer equation and diffusion approximation

    T. Tarvainen;M. Vauhkonen;V. Kolehmainen;J. P. Kaipio

  • The Inverse Conductivity Problem with an Imperfectly Known Boundary

    Ville Kolehmainen;Matti Lassas;Petri Ola

  • RECONSTRUCTION OF DOMAIN BOUNDARY AND CONDUCTIVITY IN ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY USING THE APPROXIMATION ERROR APPROACH

    Antti Nissinen;Ville Kolehmainen;Jari P. Kaipio

  • An approximation error approach for compensating for modelling errors between the radiative transfer equation and the diffusion approximation in diffuse optical tomography

    T Tarvainen;T Tarvainen;V Kolehmainen;A Pulkkinen;A Pulkkinen;M Vauhkonen

  • MARGINALIZATION OF UNINTERESTING DISTRIBUTED PARAMETERS IN INVERSE PROBLEMS-APPLICATION TO DIFFUSE OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY

    Kolehmainen;T Tarvainen;Arridge;Jari Kaipio

Frequent Co-Authors

Jari P. Kaipio
Jari P. Kaipio University of Auckland
Simon R. Arridge
Simon R. Arridge University College London
Marko Vauhkonen
Marko Vauhkonen University of Eastern Finland
Matti Lassas
Matti Lassas University of Helsinki
Martin Schweiger
Martin Schweiger University College London
Erkki Somersalo
Erkki Somersalo Case Western Reserve University
Olli Gröhn
Olli Gröhn University of Eastern Finland
David A. Boas
David A. Boas Boston University
Renato M. Cotta
Renato M. Cotta Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Theodore J. Huppert
Theodore J. Huppert University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, expanding skillsets through related online degrees can significantly enhance career prospects. Many often consider pursuing an MBA to complement their analytical skills. Popular options include best 1 year mba programs, which offer accelerated paths to leadership roles while balancing time commitments effectively.

Flexibility is another key factor. Degree seekers can benefit from programs designed to accept transfer credits, making it easier to leverage prior coursework. Exploring online mba with transfer credits accepted ensures smoother transitions and potentially reduced costs.

Moreover, data analytics is a growing field closely tied to mathematical expertise. A master in data analytics equips graduates with vital skills to interpret complex data, driving decision-making in technology, finance, and healthcare.

For those seeking easier entry or exploring options to begin their business education, researching the easiest mba program to get into can provide accessible alternatives without compromising educational quality.

Best Scientists Citing Ville Kolehmainen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles