World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich Hoheisel

Ulrich Hoheisel

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
4245
World Ranking
9356
National Ranking
785

Ulrich Hoheisel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Hoheisel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 74 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ulrich Hoheisel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Hoheisel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Hoheisel is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany, focusing their research within the field of Medicine. Their body of work spans several interconnected subfields, including Physiology, Pharmacology, Cell Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their research primarily explores topics related to Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, with additional emphasis on Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds, Myofascial Pain Diagnosis and Treatment, Pain Management and Placebo Effect, Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Pain
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • PAIN Reports

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Ulrich Hoheisel include:

  • "Central sensitization: clinical utility of a physiological concept for the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems and for nociplastic pain," 2022, Pain
  • "Spinal cord fractalkine (CX3CL1) signaling is critical for neuronal sensitization in experimental nonspecific, myofascial low back pain," 2021, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Rat dorsal horn neurons primed by stress develop a long-lasting manifest sensitization after a short-lasting nociceptive low back input," 2021, PAIN Reports
  • "TRPM3-mediated dynamic mitochondrial activity in nerve growth factor-induced latent sensitization of chronic low back pain," 2022, Pain
  • "Persistent muscle hyperalgesia after adolescent stress is exacerbated by a mild-nociceptive input in adulthood and is associated with microglia activation," 2022, Scientific Reports

They have collaborated regularly with co-authors including Rolf-Detlef Treede, Siegfried Mense, Dan Wang, Handan Moerz, and Sathish Kumar Singaravelu.

Best Publications

  • Appearance of new receptive fields in rat dorsal horn neurons following noxious stimulation of skeletal muscle: a model for referral of muscle pain?

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Siegfried Mense;David G. Simons;Xian-Min Yu

  • Sensory innervation of the thoracolumbar fascia in rats and humans.

    J. Tesarz;U. Hoheisel;B. Wiedenhöfer;S. Mense

  • Excitatory and modulatory effects of inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophins on mechanosensitive group IV muscle afferents in the rat.

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Thomas Unger;Siegfried Mense

  • Long-term changes in discharge behaviour of cat dorsal horn neurones following noxious stimulation of deep tissues.

    U. Hoheisel;S. Mense

  • Sensory findings after stimulation of the thoracolumbar fascia with hypertonic saline suggest its contribution to low back pain

    Andreas Schilder;Ulrich Hoheisel;Walter Magerl;Justus Benrath

  • Therapeutic Potential of Inhibitors of Endocannabinoid Degradation for the Treatment of Stress-Related Hyperalgesia in an Animal Model of Chronic Pain

    Ermelinda Lomazzo;Laura Bindila;Floor Remmers;Raissa Lerner

  • Acidic pH and capsaicin activate mechanosensitive group IV muscle receptors in the rat.

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Jochen Reinöhl;Thomas Unger;Siegfried Mense

  • Functional reorganization in the rat dorsal horn during an experimental myositis

    Unknown

  • Lesions of rat skeletal muscle after local block of acetylcholinesterase and neuromuscular stimulation.

    Siegfried Mense;Dave G Simons;Ulrich Hoheisel;Beate Quenzer

  • Effects of a carrageenan-induced myositis on the discharge properties of group III and IV muscle receptors in the cat.

    Unknown

  • Adenosine triphosphate as a stimulant for nociceptive and non-nociceptive muscle group IV receptors in the rat.

    Jochen Reinöhl;Ulrich Hoheisel;Thomas Unger;Siegfried Mense

  • Response behaviour of cat dorsal horn neurones receiving input from skeletal muscle and other deep somatic tissues.

    Unknown

  • Sensitization of rat dorsal horn neurons by NGF-induced subthreshold potentials and low-frequency activation. A study employing intracellular recordings in vivo

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Thomas Unger;Siegfried Mense

  • Dorsal horn neurons having input from low back structures in rats.

    Toru Taguchi;Ulrich Hoheisel;Siegfried Mense

  • Myositis-induced functional reorganisation of the rat dorsal horn: effects of spinal superfusion with antagonists to neurokinin and glutamate receptors.

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Birgitta Sander;Siegfried Mense

  • Nociceptive input from the rat thoracolumbar fascia to lumbar dorsal horn neurones.

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Toru Taguchi;Rolf-Detlef Treede;Siegfried Mense

  • Injection of nerve growth factor into a low back muscle induces long-lasting latent hypersensitivity in rat dorsal horn neurons.

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Ragna Reuter;Milena Fernandes de Freitas;Rolf-Detlef Treede

  • Role of spinal microglia in myositis-induced central sensitisation: An immunohistochemical and behavioural study in rats

    Marucia Chacur;Marucia Chacur;Daniela Lambertz;Ulrich Hoheisel;Siegfried Mense

  • Observations on the morphology of axons and somata of slowly conducting dorsal root ganglion cells in the cat

    U Hoheisel;S Mense

  • Termination patterns of identified group II and III afferent fibres from deep tissues in the spinal cord of the cat

    U. Hoheisel;E. Lehmann-Willenbrock;S. Mense

  • Non-myelinated afferent fibres do not originate exclusively from the smallest dorsal root ganglion cells in the cat

    U. Hoheisel;S. Mense

  • Innervation changes induced by inflammation of the rat thoracolumbar fascia.

    U Hoheisel;J Rosner;S Mense

  • The possible role of the NO-cGMP pathway in nociception: different spinal and supraspinal action of enzyme blockers on rat dorsal horn neurones

    Ulrich Hoheisel;Thomas Unger;Siegfried Mense

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf-Detlef Treede
Rolf-Detlef Treede Heidelberg University
Thomas Unger
Thomas Unger Maastricht University
Walter Magerl
Walter Magerl Heidelberg University
Rupert Palme
Rupert Palme University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Kazue Mizumura
Kazue Mizumura Nihon University
Peter Gass
Peter Gass Heidelberg University
Beat Lutz
Beat Lutz Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Martin Schmelz
Martin Schmelz Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in neuroscience but want flexibility in your educational path? Many students explore related degrees and online programs to broaden their expertise or open new career opportunities. Accredited online programs in psychology, social work, and counseling can be practical options that complement a neuroscience background.

For those drawn to behavioral science, an accredited online psychology degree is a popular choice. These degrees provide a strong foundation for advanced study or work in mental health and research roles. If you’re interested in clinical practice, pursuing mft accredited programs can prepare you for licensure as a marriage and family therapist.

Social work also offers direct career paths to patient and community-focused roles. Options like 1 year msw programs online no bsw allow quick entry into the field, even for students without a bachelor’s in social work. For doctoral-level interests, consider online psych d programs that focus on clinical psychology careers.

Exploring these related paths can help you align your neuroscience studies with your long-term personal interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Hoheisel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles