World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 31 8933 8301 2899 2565 92 3827

Tim P. Dooley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tim P. Dooley between 1951 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tim P. Dooley published across 75 years, from 1951 to 2025, averaging 1.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 10 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1951 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tim P. Dooley: publications per year, 1951 to 2025
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 0
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 0
2007 4
2008 1
2009 3
2010 1
2011 2
2012 5
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 2
2017 9
2018 3
2019 9
2020 12
2021 4
2022 1
2023 10
2024 5
2025 5
Total 102
Download as CSV

Tim P. Dooley publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim P. Dooley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 92 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376 92
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Tim P. Dooley D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim P. Dooley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215 31
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tim P. Dooley is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the domain of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on geophysics, Earth-surface processes, atmospheric science, mechanics of materials, and environmental chemistry.

Their scholarly output includes significant work in several subfields, frequently addressing geological formations and processes, earthquake and tectonic studies, geological and geophysical studies worldwide, geology and paleoclimatology research, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, and geological and geochemical analysis.

Tim P. Dooley has authored and contributed to multiple papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • "What model material to use? A Review on rock analogs for structural geology and tectonics," 2020, Earth-Science Reviews
  • "Extension and inversion of salt-bearing rift systems," 2020, Solid Earth
  • "The Role of Salt Tectonics in the Energy Transition: An Overview and Future Challenges," 2023, Tektonika
  • "Deformation styles related to intraplate strike-slip fault systems of the Saharan-Tunisian Southern Atlas (North Africa): New kinematic models," 2020, Journal of Structural Geology
  • "An alternative model for the role of salt depositional configuration and preexisting salt structures in the evolution of the Southern Pyrenees, Spain," 2021, Journal of Structural Geology

Their frequent co-authors include Michael R. Hudec, Gillian Apps, Juan I. Soto, Jacqueline E. Reber, and Oliver B. Duffy. This highlights collaboration across studies related to structural geology and tectonics.

Tim P. Dooley's work has been published across a selection of journals, with repeated contributions to the Journal of Structural Geology, Interpretation, Tektonika, Earth-Science Reviews, and Solid Earth.

Best Publications

  • Analogue modelling of intraplate strike-slip tectonics: A review and new experimental results

    Tim P. Dooley;Guido Schreurs

  • Analog Modeling of Pull-Apart Basins

    Tim Dooley;Ken McClay

  • 4D analogue modelling of transtensional pull-apart basins

    Jonathan E. Wu;Ken McClay;Paul Whitehouse;Tim P Dooley

  • 4-D evolution of rift systems: Insights from scaled physical models

    K. R. McClay;T. Dooley;P. Whitehouse;M. Mills

  • 3D evolution of fold and thrust belts formed by oblique convergence

    K. R. McClay;P. S. Whitehouse;Tim P Dooley;M. Richards

  • Analogue models of pull-apart basins

    Ken McClay;Tim Dooley

  • Deep-water polygonal fault systems as terrestrial analogs for large-scale Martian polygonal terrains

    Lorena Moscardelli;Tim Dooley;Dallas Dunlap;Martin Jackson

  • Inflation and deflation of deeply buried salt stocks during lateral shortening

    Tim P. Dooley;Martin P.A. Jackson;Michael R. Hudec

  • Quantifying the origin and geometry of circular sag structures in northern Fort Worth Basin, Texas: Paleocave collapse, pull-apart fault systems, or hydrothermal alteration?

    Angela McDonnell;Robert G Loucks;Tim P Dooley

  • The salt mine : a digital atlas of salt tectonics

    Michael R. Hudec;Martin P. A. Jackson;Nancy Cottington;Bruno C. Vendeville

  • Strain partitioning in gravity-driven shortening of a thick, multilayered evaporite sequence

    Joe Cartwright;Martin Jackson;Tim Dooley;Simon Higgins

  • Analog modeling of progradational delta systems

    K. R. McClay;Tim P Dooley;G. Lewis

  • Tectonic Evolution of the Sanga Sanga Block, Mahakam Delta, Kalimantan, Indonesia

    Ken McClay;Tim P Dooley;Angus Ferguson;Josep Poblet

  • Structural evolution of salt-influenced fold-and-thrust belts: A synthesis and new insights from basins containing isolated salt diapirs

    Oliver B. Duffy;Tim P. Dooley;Michael R. Hudec;Martin P. A. Jackson

  • Salt tectonics above complex basement extensional fault systems: results from analogue modelling

    Tim P Dooley;Tim P Dooley;K. R. Mcclay;M. Hempton;D. Smit

  • What model material to use? A Review on rock analogs for structural geology and tectonics

    Jacqueline E. Reber;Michele L. Cooke;Tim P. Dooley

  • Initiation and growth of salt-based thrust belts on passive margins: results from physical models

    Tim P. Dooley;Martin P. A. Jackson;Michael R. Hudec

  • 3D analogue models of variable displacement extensional faults: applications to the Revfallet Fault system, offshore mid-Norway

    Tim P Dooley;K. R. McClay;R. Pascoe

  • 4D evolution of segmented strike-slip fault systems: applications to NW Europe

    T. Dooley;K. McCLAY;M. Bonora

  • Coeval extension and shortening above and below salt canopies on an uplifted, continental margin: Application to the northern Gulf of Mexico

    Tim P. Dooley;Martin P. A. Jackson;Michael R. Hudec

  • The effects of base-salt relief on salt flow and suprasalt deformation patterns — Part 1: Flow across simple steps in the base of salt

    Tim P. Dooley;Michael R. Hudec;Dan Carruthers;Martin P. A. Jackson

  • Enigmatic structures within salt walls of the Santos Basin—Part 2: Mechanical explanation from physical modelling

    Tim P. Dooley;Martin P.A. Jackson;Christopher A.-L. Jackson;Michael R. Hudec

  • Breakout of squeezed stocks: dispersal of roof fragments, source of extrusive salt and interaction with regional thrust faults

    Tim P Dooley;Martin P Jackson;Michael R Hudec

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin P. A. Jackson
Martin P. A. Jackson The University of Texas at Austin
Michael R. Hudec
Michael R. Hudec The University of Texas at Austin
Ken McClay
Ken McClay Royal Holloway University of London
Christopher A.-L. Jackson
Christopher A.-L. Jackson Imperial College London
Ruud Weijermars
Ruud Weijermars King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Giacomo Corti
Giacomo Corti National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Alan R. Gillespie
Alan R. Gillespie University of Washington
John B. Adams
John B. Adams University of Washington
Richard Gloaguen
Richard Gloaguen Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
David R. Montgomery
David R. Montgomery University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often leads students to consider diverse career paths and complementary degrees. For veterans looking to transition into new fields, online Spanish degree programs for veterans offer valuable language skills that can enhance communication in global environmental roles.

Creative professionals interested in combining art with science may find an online MFA degree appealing, as it fosters innovative approaches to environmental education and outreach through visual storytelling.

Management skills are critical in Earth Science careers, especially for coordinating research projects or sustainability initiatives. Pursuing an online human resource management masters programs can help students develop leadership abilities and navigate organizational challenges in scientific agencies.

Additionally, many mature learners explore new opportunities later in life. Accessible college degrees for seniors can provide flexible, affordable education for those interested in Earth Science-related studies or career changes.

Best Scientists Citing Tim P. Dooley

Trending Scientists