World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tijs Neutens

Tijs Neutens

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6693 6221 79 78 137 6183

Tijs Neutens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tijs Neutens between 2005 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tijs Neutens published across 13 years, from 2005 to 2017, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2012. 8 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2012. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 1 publication
2005 2017

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tijs Neutens: publications per year, 2005 to 2017
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 5
2007 10
2008 8
2009 11
2010 21
2011 11
2012 22
2013 15
2014 14
2015 20
2016 7
2017 1
Total 146
Download as CSV

Tijs Neutens publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tijs Neutens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 137
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Tijs Neutens D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tijs Neutens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Tijs Neutens is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has contributed to multiple publications primarily in the intersection of computer science and educational psychology. Their work is focused on the application of computational thinking and programming education, addressing topics related to teaching methods, learning ecologies, and assessment in educational contexts.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Empowering Vocational Students: A Research-Based Framework for Computational Thinking Integration" (2024), published in Education Sciences
  • "Comparing learning ecologies of primary graphical programming: create or fix?" (2021), published in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • "Assessment of Code, Which Aspects Do Teachers Consider and How Are They Valued?" (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Computing Education
  • "Teachers' computational thinking content knowledge: Development of a measurement instrument" (2024), published in Computers & Education

Frequent co-authors of Tijs Neutens include:

  • Francis Wyffels
  • Kris Coolsaet
  • Seppe Hermans
  • Peter Van Petegem
  • Evelien Barbion

The main fields of study associated with their work are:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

These break down further into subfields of study as follows:

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Education

The primary research topics covered by Tijs Neutens involve:

  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

Their publications appear in notable venues including:

  • Education Sciences
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • ACM Transactions on Computing Education
  • Computers & Education

Tijs Neutens's research contributes to the understanding of how computational thinking and programming can be integrated effectively into different educational settings. This includes the development of assessment tools, the study of learning environments in graphical programming for primary education, and frameworks supporting vocational student engagement with computational thinking.

Best Publications

  • Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers

    Tijs Neutens

  • An Analysis of the Public Perception of Flood Risk on the Belgian Coast

    Wim Kellens;Ruud Zaalberg;Tijs Neutens;Wouter Vanneuville

  • Equity of urban service delivery: a comparison of different accessibility measures

    Tijs Neutens;Tim Schwanen;Frank Witlox;Philippe De Maeyer

  • Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital

    Tim Schwanen;Karen Lucas;Nihan Akyelken;Diego Cisternas Solsona

  • Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels

    Koos Fransen;Tijs Neutens;Steven Farber;Philippe De Maeyer

  • The Prism of Everyday Life: Towards a New Research Agenda for Time Geography

    Tijs Neutens;Tim Schwanen;Frank Witlox

  • The use of Bluetooth for analysing spatiotemporal dynamics of human movement at mass events: a case study of the Ghent Festivities.

    Mathias Versichele;Tijs Neutens;Matthias Delafontaine;Nico Van de Weghe

  • Spatiotemporal accessibility to supermarkets using public transit: an interaction potential approach in Cincinnati, Ohio

    Michael J. Widener;Steven Farber;Tijs Neutens;Mark Horner

  • A commuter-based two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility of daycare centers

    Koos Fransen;Tijs Neutens;Philippe De Maeyer;Greet Deruyter

  • Pattern mining in tourist attraction visits through association rule learning on Bluetooth tracking data: A case study of Ghent, Belgium

    Mathias Versichele;Liesbeth de Groote;Manuel Claeys Bouuaert;Tijs Neutens

  • Using urban commuting data to calculate a spatiotemporal accessibility measure for food environment studies

    Michael J. Widener;Steven Farber;Tijs Neutens;Mark W. Horner

  • The Social Interaction Potential of Metropolitan Regions: A Time-Geographic Measurement Approach Using Joint Accessibility

    Steven Farber;Tijs Neutens;Harvey J. Miller;Xiao Li

  • An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space–time accessibility

    Tijs Neutens;Matthias Delafontaine;Darren M. Scott;Philippe De Maeyer

  • Measuring segregation using patterns of daily travel behavior: A social interaction based model of exposure

    Steven Farber;Morton O'Kelly;Harvey J. Miller;Tijs Neutens

  • Dynamic assessment of exposure to air pollution using mobile phone data.

    Bart Dewulf;Bart Dewulf;Tijs Neutens;Wouter Lefebvre;Gerdy Seynaeve

  • Relationship between Spatial Proximity and Travel-to-Work Distance: The Effect of the Compact City

    Kobe Boussauw;Tijs Neutens;Frank Witlox

  • A three-dimensional network-based space–time prism

    Tijs Neutens;Nico Van de Weghe;Frank Witlox;Philippe De Maeyer

  • Anchor uncertainty and space-time prisms on road networks

    Bart Kuijpers;Harvey J. Miller;Tijs Neutens;Walied Othman

  • Analysing spatiotemporal sequences in Bluetooth tracking data

    Matthias Delafontaine;Mathias Versichele;Tijs Neutens;Nico Van de Weghe

  • My space or your space? Towards a measure of joint accessibility

    Tijs Neutens;Tim Schwanen;Frank Witlox;Philippe De Maeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Witlox
Frank Witlox Ghent University
Tim Schwanen
Tim Schwanen University of Oxford
Steven Farber
Steven Farber University of Toronto
Harvey J. Miller
Harvey J. Miller The Ohio State University
Bernard De Baets
Bernard De Baets Ghent University
Francesca Cagnacci
Francesca Cagnacci Fondazione Edmund Mach
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Ghent University
Darren M. Scott
Darren M. Scott McMaster University
Karen Lucas
Karen Lucas University of Manchester
Luc Int Panis
Luc Int Panis Hasselt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancements in online education have opened new pathways for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities careers. Many accredited universities now offer 1 year master's programs online for those seeking advanced credentials in a short time frame. These accelerated options allow students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

For undergraduate students, online bachelor degree programs provide the flexibility to complete foundational studies at your own pace. Whether you're starting fresh or transferring credits, these programs can help you earn your degree efficiently.

Students interested in social work and behavioral sciences have even more tailored options. There are cheap msw programs online designed for affordability without sacrificing quality. In addition, aspiring behavior analysts can pursue their licensing goals with bcba programs online, which prepare graduates for Board Certification exams.

These online degrees align with evolving workforce demands and make it easier to pursue rewarding careers in social services, research, policy, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Tijs Neutens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles