World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
58
Citations
11760
World Ranking
1667
National Ranking
792

Thomas W. Farmer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Farmer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas W. Farmer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Farmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Promoting Interpersonal Competence and Educational Success Through Extracurricular Activity Participation

    Joseph L. Mahoney;Beverley D. Cairns;Thomas W. Farmer

  • Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations.

    Philip C. Rodkin;Thomas W. Farmer;Ruth Pearl;Richard Van Acker

  • Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences

    Thomas W. Farmer;Meghan McAuliffe Lines;Jill V. Hamm

  • Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations.

    Unknown

  • Peer Groups, Popularity, and Social Preference Trajectories of Social Functioning Among Students With and Without Learning Disabilities

    David B. Estell;Martin H. Jones;Ruth Pearl;Richard Van Acker

  • Students with Exceptionalities and the Peer Group Context of Bullying and Victimization in Late Elementary School

    David B. Estell;Thomas W. Farmer;Matthew J. Irvin;Amity Crowther

  • Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural african american early adolescents.

    Thomas W. Farmer;David B. Estell;Jennifer L. Bishop;Keri K. O'Neal

  • They’re Cool: Social Status and Peer Group Supports for Aggressive Boys and Girls

    Philip C. Rodkin;Thomas W. Farmer;Ruth Pearl;Richard Van Acker

  • Antisocial and Prosocial Correlates of Classroom Social Positions: The Social Network Centrality Perspective

    Thomas W. Farmer;Philip C. Rodkin

  • Relationship of school context to rural youth's educational achievement and aspirations.

    Matthew J. Irvin;Judith L. Meece;Soo yong Byun;Thomas W. Farmer

  • Identifying Children's Peer Social Networks in School Classrooms: Links Between Peer Reports and Observed Interactions

    Scott D. Gest;Thomas W. Farmer;Beverley D. Cairns;Hongling Xie

  • Social Relationships of Students with Exceptionalities in Mainstream Classrooms: Social Networks and Homophily:

    Thomas W. Farmer;Elizabeth M. Z. Farmer

  • Issues in Special Education Teacher Recruitment, Retention, and Professional Development: Considerations in Supporting Rural Teachers

    Ann B. Berry;Robert A. Petrin;Maggie L. Gravelle;Thomas W. Farmer

  • Teachers' attunement to students' peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social–affective context following the middle school transition

    Jill V. Hamm;Thomas W. Farmer;Kimberly Dadisman;Maggie Gravelle

  • Different Forms of Aggression among Inner-City African-American Children: Gender, Configurations, and School Social Networks.

    Hongling Xie;Thomas W Farmer;Beverley D Cairns

  • Distance Education Use in Rural Schools

    Wallace H. Hannum;Matthew J. Irvin;Jonathan B. Banks;Thomas W. Farmer

  • Individual characteristics, early adolescent peer affiliations, and school dropout: an examination of aggressive and popular group types

    Thomas W Farmer;David B Estell;Man-Chi Leung;Hollister Trott

  • Educational Barriers of Rural Youth: Relation of Individual and Contextual Difference Variables

    Matthew J. Irvin;Soo yong Byun;Judith L. Meece;Thomas W. Farmer

  • Effectiveness of Using Learner-Centered Principles on Student Retention in Distance Education Courses in Rural Schools

    Wallace H. Hannum;Matthew J. Irvin;Pui Wa Lei;Thomas W. Farmer

  • Aggression in Inner-City Early Elementary Classrooms: Individual and Peer-Group Configurations.

    David B. Estell;Robert B. Cairns;Thomas W. Farmer;Beverley D. Cairns

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Farmer

Recently Published Articles