D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Computer Science
Austria
2022

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Computer Science D-index 63 Citations 22,834 212 World Ranking 1701 National Ranking 12

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Austria Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Algorithm
  • Computer vision

Thomas Pock mostly deals with Algorithm, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Mathematical optimization and Optical flow. His Algorithm research integrates issues from Image segmentation, Noise reduction, Reaction–diffusion system and Linear filter. His Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Machine learning, Graphics and Pattern recognition.

His Computer vision study deals with Regularization intersecting with Critical point. The study incorporates disciplines such as Function, Rate of convergence, Total variation denoising and Prior probability in addition to Mathematical optimization. His research integrates issues of Classification of discontinuities and Robustness in his study of Optical flow.

His most cited work include:

  • A First-Order Primal-Dual Algorithm for Convex Problems with Applications to Imaging (3010 citations)
  • A duality based approach for realtime TV-L 1 optical flow (1155 citations)
  • Total Generalized Variation (992 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Artificial intelligence, Algorithm, Computer vision, Optical flow and Iterative reconstruction. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Machine learning and Pattern recognition. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Image processing, Image restoration and Mathematical optimization.

His Computer vision research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Computer graphics and Graphics. Thomas Pock interconnects Pixel and Robustness in the investigation of issues within Optical flow. His work deals with themes such as Artificial neural network and Image quality, which intersect with Deep learning.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (54.85%)
  • Algorithm (44.78%)
  • Computer vision (26.87%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (54.85%)
  • Algorithm (44.78%)
  • Deep learning (17.91%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Artificial intelligence, Algorithm, Deep learning, Iterative reconstruction and Pattern recognition. Artificial intelligence is closely attributed to Computer vision in his work. His Algorithm study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Inverse problem and Optimal control.

The concepts of his Deep learning study are interwoven with issues in Artificial neural network, Convolutional neural network, Image quality and Robustness. His Iterative reconstruction study also includes

  • Compressed sensing which connect with Graphics, Filter, Gradient descent and Computed tomography,
  • Range and related Level of detail,
  • Transfer of learning together with Residual. His study explores the link between Pattern recognition and topics such as Synthetic data that cross with problems in Identification.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. (549 citations)
  • Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. (549 citations)
  • Assessment of the generalization of learned image reconstruction and the potential for transfer learning (79 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

A First-Order Primal-Dual Algorithm for Convex Problems with Applications to Imaging

Antonin Chambolle;Thomas Pock.
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision (2011)

4283 Citations

A duality based approach for realtime TV-L 1 optical flow

C. Zach;T. Pock;H. Bischof.
dagm conference on pattern recognition (2007)

1805 Citations

Total Generalized Variation

Kristian Bredies;Karl Kunisch;Thomas Pock.
Siam Journal on Imaging Sciences (2010)

1480 Citations

Trainable Nonlinear Reaction Diffusion: A Flexible Framework for Fast and Effective Image Restoration

Yunjin Chen;Thomas Pock.
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2017)

973 Citations

Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Kerstin Hammernik;Teresa Klatzer;Erich Kobler;Michael P. Recht.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2018)

972 Citations

Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI

Florian Knoll;Kristian Bredies;Thomas Pock;Rudolf Stollberger.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2011)

559 Citations

An Improved Algorithm for TV-L1 Optical Flow

Andreas Wedel;Thomas Pock;Christopher Zach;Horst Bischof.
Statistical and Geometrical Approaches to Visual Motion Analysis (2009)

540 Citations

Anisotropic Huber-L1 Optical Flow

Manuel Werlberger;Werner Trobin;Thomas Pock;Andreas Wedel.
british machine vision conference (2009)

527 Citations

PROST: Parallel robust online simple tracking

Jakob Santner;Christian Leistner;Amir Saffari;Thomas Pock.
computer vision and pattern recognition (2010)

515 Citations

An introduction to Total Variation for Image Analysis

Antonin Chambolle;Vicent Caselles;Matteo Novaga;Daniel Cremers.
(2009)

474 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Pock

Daniel Cremers

Daniel Cremers

Technical University of Munich

Publications: 154

Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb

Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb

University of Cambridge

Publications: 101

Marc Pollefeys

Marc Pollefeys

ETH Zurich

Publications: 70

Horst Bischof

Horst Bischof

Graz University of Technology

Publications: 69

Xue-Cheng Tai

Xue-Cheng Tai

Hong Kong Baptist University

Publications: 58

Gabriele Steidl

Gabriele Steidl

Technical University of Berlin

Publications: 57

Jean-Christophe Pesquet

Jean-Christophe Pesquet

CentraleSupélec

Publications: 56

Joachim Weickert

Joachim Weickert

Saarland University

Publications: 54

Emil Y. Sidky

Emil Y. Sidky

University of Chicago

Publications: 54

Kristian Bredies

Kristian Bredies

University of Graz

Publications: 52

Martin Burger

Martin Burger

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

Publications: 51

Xiaochuan Pan

Xiaochuan Pan

University of Chicago

Publications: 45

Christoph Schnörr

Christoph Schnörr

Heidelberg University

Publications: 44

Wangmeng Zuo

Wangmeng Zuo

Harbin Institute of Technology

Publications: 42

Lei Zhang

Lei Zhang

Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publications: 39

Stanley Osher

Stanley Osher

University of California, Los Angeles

Publications: 39

Trending Scientists

Paul Barford

Paul Barford

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Stuart C. Shapiro

Stuart C. Shapiro

University at Buffalo, State University of New York

J. Zico Kolter

J. Zico Kolter

Carnegie Mellon University

Peter P. Roller

Peter P. Roller

National Institutes of Health

D. Timothy Bishop

D. Timothy Bishop

University of Leeds

Terry J. Hassold

Terry J. Hassold

Washington State University

Seiichiro Hasezawa

Seiichiro Hasezawa

University of Tokyo

Karin Ljung

Karin Ljung

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Sabrina Duranti

Sabrina Duranti

University of Parma

Manuel Garber

Manuel Garber

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Per Halkjær Nielsen

Per Halkjær Nielsen

Aalborg University

Per Moldrup

Per Moldrup

Aalborg University

Xuefa Shi

Xuefa Shi

First Institute of Oceanography

Mark F. Newman

Mark F. Newman

Duke University

David I. Levine

David I. Levine

University of California, Berkeley

Laura W. Perna

Laura W. Perna

University of Pennsylvania

Something went wrong. Please try again later.