World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
14692
World Ranking
5864
National Ranking
2576

Thomas A. Woolsey publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Woolsey sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 113 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas A. Woolsey D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Woolsey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Thomas A. Woolsey is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Throughout their career, Woolsey has been recognized for contributions to scientific research, holding notable fellowships that underscore their involvement in the academic community.

Woolsey was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2000. Subsequently, in 2003, they received the distinction of Fellow from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. These honors reflect a sustained engagement with scientific advancement over multiple years.

While specific data regarding recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, and main research topics were not provided, Woolsey's association with a prominent institution suggests active participation in research activities.

Best Publications

  • The autoradiographic demonstration of axonal connections in the central nervous system.

    W.M. Cowan;W.M. Cowan;D.I. Gottlieb;D.I. Gottlieb;Anita E. Hendrickson;Anita E. Hendrickson;J.L. Price;J.L. Price

  • The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex

    Unknown

  • Somatosensory Cortex: Structural Alterations following Early Injury to Sense Organs

    Hendrik Van der Loos;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Structure of layer IV in the somatosensory neocortex of the rat: description and comparison with the mouse.

    Carol Welker;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Areal changes in mouse cortical barrels following vibrissal damage at different postnatal ages.

    Thomas A. Woolsey;Janice R. Wann

  • Collateral Growth and Angiogenesis Around Cortical Stroke

    Ling Wei;Joseph P. Erinjeri;Carl M. Rovainen;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Comparative anatomical studies of the Sml face cortex with special reference to the occurrence of “barrels” in layer IV

    Thomas A. Woolsey;Carol Welker;Richard H. Schwartz

  • New Patterns of Intracortical Projections after Focal Cortical Stroke

    S. Thomas Carmichael;Ling Wei;Carl M. Rovainen;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Neuronal Units Linked to Microvascular Modules in Cerebral Cortex: Response Elements for Imaging the Brain

    Thomas A. Woolsey;Carl M. Rovainen;Stephanie B. Cox;Martin H. Henegar

  • Effects of neonatal whisker lesions on mouse central trigeminal pathways

    Dianne Durham;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Mouse SmI cortex: qualitative and quantitative classification of golgi-impregnated barrel neurons

    T A Woolsey;M L Dierker;D F Wann

  • Localized dynamic changes in cortical blood flow with whisker stimulation corresponds to matched vascular and neuronal architecture of rat barrels.

    Stephanie B. Cox;Thomas A. Woolsey;Carl M. Rovainen

  • Increased brain capillaries in chronic hypoxia

    Jaime A. Boero;Jonathan Ascher;Alberto Arregui;Carl Rovainen

  • Dendritic plasticity in mouse barrel cortex following postnatal vibrissa follicle damage

    Roger M. Harris;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Morphology of Golgi-Cox-impregnated barrel neurons in rat SmI cortex

    Daniel J. Simons;Daniel J. Simons;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Functional organization in mouse barrel cortex.

    Daniel J. Simons;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Local intra- and interlaminar connections in mouse barrel cortex.

    Kerry L. Bernardo;James S. McCasland;Thomas A. Woolsey;Robert N. Strominger

  • A proportional relationship between peripheral innervation density and cortical neuron number in the somatosensory system of the mouse

    Kerwin J. Lee;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • An On-Line Digital-Computer System for the Semiautomatic Analysis of Golgi-Impregnated Neurons

    Donald F. Wann;Thomas A. Woolsey;Michael L. Dierker;W. Maxwell Cowan

  • Cytoarchitectonic correlates of the vibrissae in the medullary trigeminal complex of the mouse

    Pokay M. Ma;Thomas A. Woolsey

  • Infraorbital nerve blockade from birth does not disrupt central trigeminal pattern formation in the rat

    Theodore A. Henderson;Thomas A. Woolsey;Mark F. Jacquin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Fox
Kevin Fox Cardiff University
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joseph A. O'Sullivan
Joseph A. O'Sullivan Washington University in St. Louis
Luis Glaser
Luis Glaser Washington University in St. Louis
Arnold W. Strauss
Arnold W. Strauss Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jason S. Lewis
Jason S. Lewis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Anita E. Hendrickson
Anita E. Hendrickson University of Washington
Robert W. Rhoades
Robert W. Rhoades University of Toledo Medical Center
Stephen M. Highstein
Stephen M. Highstein Marine Biological Laboratory
S. Thomas Carmichael
S. Thomas Carmichael University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary careers, including fields like social work, psychology, mental health counseling, and school counseling. Pursuing an online degree offers flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for students to balance learning with other commitments.

For those interested in social advocacy, an accelerated social work degree can provide the foundational knowledge needed for roles in mental health support and community services. If you're considering a psychological approach, many colleges with accelerated psychology programs offer coursework that is both comprehensive and time-efficient.

Cost is another important factor. If budget is a concern, look for the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) or consider the cheapest online masters in mental health counseling to find high-quality programs at a lower price.

These alternative degrees and career pathways are excellent options for those looking to complement their neuroscience background or explore associated mental health professions.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas A. Woolsey

Recently Published Articles