World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 51 14002 12602 247 218 206 8824

Szabolcs Fekete publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Szabolcs Fekete between 1954 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Szabolcs Fekete published across 72 years, from 1954 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2018. 24 of the 248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1954 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2018. 1954: 1 publication 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 7 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 4 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 15 publications
1954 2025

248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Szabolcs Fekete: publications per year, 1954 to 2025
Year Publications
1954 1
1955 0
1956 0
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 7
1966 2
1967 0
1968 4
1969 2
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 4
2010 6
2011 5
2012 13
2013 13
2014 12
2015 13
2016 19
2017 20
2018 24
2019 19
2020 9
2021 16
2022 13
2023 16
2024 9
2025 15
Total 248
Download as CSV

Szabolcs Fekete publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Szabolcs Fekete sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 206 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281 206
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Szabolcs Fekete D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Szabolcs Fekete sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861 51
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Szabolcs Fekete is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and chemistry. Their research spans multiple subfields, including molecular biology, spectroscopy, biomedical engineering, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and analytical chemistry.

The scientist's main research topics focus on protein purification and stability, analytical chemistry and chromatography, microfluidic and capillary electrophoresis applications, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects, chromatography in natural products, and biosimilars and bioanalytical methods.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Therapeutic Fc-fusion proteins: Current analytical strategies (2020), published in Journal of Separation Science
  • Prevalence and correlates of aggressive behavior in psychiatric inpatient populations (2022), published in World Journal of Psychiatry
  • Size exclusion chromatography of biopharmaceutical products: From current practices for proteins to emerging trends for viral vectors, nucleic acids and lipid nanoparticles (2024), published in Journal of Chromatography A
  • Current and future trends in reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of therapeutic proteins (2020), published in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
  • Coupling non-denaturing chromatography to mass spectrometry for the characterization of monoclonal antibodies and related products (2020), published in Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Szabolcs Fekete include:

  • Davy Guillarme
  • Matthew Lauber
  • Mateusz Imiołek
  • Amarande Murisier
  • Valentina D'Atri

Szabolcs Fekete has published many articles in several leading journals, with the most common venues being:

  • Journal of Chromatography A
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
  • Journal of Separation Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

This scientist's work reflects a strong interdisciplinary approach combining biochemical and analytical techniques with a focus on chromatography and protein characterization. Their extensive publication record in areas related to chromatography and protein analysis illustrates a detailed engagement with both fundamental and applied aspects of biopharmaceutical science.

Best Publications

  • Theory and practice of size exclusion chromatography for the analysis of protein aggregates.

    Szabolcs Fekete;Alain Beck;Jean-Luc Veuthey;Davy Guillarme

  • Ion-exchange chromatography for the characterization of biopharmaceuticals

    Szabolcs Fekete;Alain Beck;Jean-Luc Veuthey;Davy Guillarme

  • Chromatographic, Electrophoretic, and Mass Spectrometric Methods for the Analytical Characterization of Protein Biopharmaceuticals.

    Szabolcs Fekete;Davy Guillarme;Pat Sandra;Koen Sandra

  • Fast liquid chromatography: The domination of core?shell and very fine particles

    Unknown

  • Current and future trends in UHPLC

    Szabolcs Fekete;Julie Schappler;Jean-Luc Veuthey;Davy Guillarme

  • Determination of isoelectric points and relative charge variants of 23 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

    Alexandre Goyon;Melissa Excoffier;Marie Claire Janin-Bussat;Balazs Bobaly

  • Method development for the separation of monoclonal antibody charge variants in cation exchange chromatography, Part II: pH gradient approach

    Szabolcs Fekete;Alain Beck;Jenő Fekete;Davy Guillarme

  • Comparative study of new shell-type, sub-2 μm fully porous and monolith stationary phases, focusing on mass-transfer resistance

    Erzsébet Oláh;Szabolcs Fekete;Jenő Fekete;Katalin Ganzler

  • Importance of instrumentation for fast liquid chromatography in pharmaceutical analysis

    Szabolcs Fekete;Isabelle Kohler;Serge Rudaz;Davy Guillarme

  • New trends in reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separations of therapeutic peptides and proteins: theory and applications.

    Szabolcs Fekete;Jean-Luc Veuthey;Davy Guillarme

  • Analytical strategies for the characterization of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

    Szabolcs Fekete;Anne-Laure Gassner;Serge Rudaz;Julie Schappler

  • Hydrophobic interaction chromatography for the characterization of monoclonal antibodies and related products

    Szabolcs Fekete;Jean-Luc Veuthey;Alain Beck;Davy Guillarme

  • Therapeutic Fc-fusion proteins: Current analytical strategies.

    Bastiaan L. Duivelshof;Amarande Murisier;Julien Camperi;Szabolcs Fekete

  • Recent Advances in Chromatography for Pharmaceutical Analysis.

    Valentina D'Atri;Szabolcs Fekete;Adrian Clarke;Jean-Luc Veuthey

  • Method development for the separation of monoclonal antibody charge variants in cation exchange chromatography, Part II: pH gradient approach.

    Unknown

  • Direct Identification of Rituximab Main Isoforms and Subunit Analysis by Online Selective Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

    Dwight R. Stoll;David C. Harmes;John Danforth;Elsa Wagner

  • Maximizing kinetic performance in supercritical fluid chromatography using state-of-the-art instruments

    Alexandre Grand-Guillaume Perrenoud;Chris Hamman;Meenakshi Goel;Jean-Luc Veuthey

  • Efficiency of the new sub-2 μm core-shell (Kinetex™) column in practice, applied for small and large molecule separation.

    Szabolcs Fekete;Katalin Ganzler;Jenő Fekete

  • Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Hyphenated with Mass Spectrometry: A Powerful Analytical Tool for the Comparison of Originator and Biosimilar Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies at the Middle-up Level of Analysis.

    Valentina D’Atri;Szabolcs Fekete;Alain Beck;Matthew Lauber

  • Kinetic evaluation of new generation of column packed with 1.3 μm core-shell particles.

    Szabolcs Fekete;Davy Guillarme

  • Potential of hydrophilic interaction chromatography for the analytical characterization of protein biopharmaceuticals

    Aurélie Claudine Periat;Szabolcs Fekete;Alessandra Cusumano;Jean-Luc Veuthey

  • Comparison of originator and biosimilar therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry

    Matthew Sorensen;David C. Harmes;Dwight R. Stoll;Gregory O. Staples

  • Shell and small particles; Evaluation of new column technology

    Szabolcs Fekete;Jenő Fekete;Katalin Ganzler

Frequent Co-Authors

Davy Guillarme
Davy Guillarme University of Geneva
Alain Beck
Alain Beck University of Strasbourg
Jean-Luc Veuthey
Jean-Luc Veuthey University of Geneva
Serge Rudaz
Serge Rudaz University of Geneva
Gert Desmet
Gert Desmet Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Pierre-Alain Carrupt
Pierre-Alain Carrupt École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
David V. McCalley
David V. McCalley University of the West of England

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of related career paths. For those fascinated by the medical field, understanding how do you become a pharmacist is invaluable. Pharmacists use chemistry knowledge extensively to develop and dispense medications.

For students interested in forensic applications, exploring the autopsy technician school process is a good start. This career combines biology and chemistry in analyzing causes of death.

Further, the best online colleges for forensic science provide affordable options for those seeking specialized education without relocating. These programs often blend chemistry with criminal justice to prepare students for forensic investigations.

For advanced studies, consider earning an online masters degree in forensic psychology. This degree merges scientific principles with psychological insights, ideal for careers involving criminal behavior analysis.

Each pathway builds on a strong foundation in chemistry, offering diverse opportunities to apply scientific skills across healthcare, forensic science, and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Szabolcs Fekete

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles