World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
69
Citations
16997
World Ranking
2350
National Ranking
294

Sue Malcolm publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sue Malcolm sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 209 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Sue Malcolm D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sue Malcolm sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sue Malcolm is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their professional background is rooted in an academic environment that supports diverse research activities and scholarly engagement.

Due to the limited availability of detailed data on research output, specific topics, coauthors, publication venues, and awards, a comprehensive summary of their academic contributions cannot be detailed further.

Best Publications

  • Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome.

    Andrew O.M. Wilkie;Andrew O.M. Wilkie;Sarah F. Slaney;Sarah F. Slaney;Michael Oldridge;Michael D. Poole

  • Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene cause Crouzon syndrome.

    William Reardon;Robin M. Winter;Paul Rutland;Louise J. Pulleyn

  • Defective expression of T-cell CD40 ligand causes X-linked immunodeficiency with hyper-IgM

    Ulf Korthäuer;Daniel Graf;Hans W. Mages;Francine Brière

  • A common mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome

    M Muenke;U Schell;A Hehr;N H Robin

  • Association between X-linked mixed deafness and mutations in the POU domain gene POU3F4

    Y. J. M. De Kok;S. M. Van Der Maarel;M. Bitner-Glindzicz;I. Huber

  • Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes.

    P Rutland;L J Pulleyn;W Reardon;M Baraitser

  • Estimation of the mutation frequencies in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies: a European collaborative study

    E. Nelis;C. van Broeckhoven;E.C.M. Mariman;A.A.W.M. Gabreëls-Festen

  • IsK and KvLQT1: Mutation in Either of the Two Subunits of the Slow Component of the Delayed Rectifier Potassium Channel Can Cause Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome

    Jessica Tyson;Lisbeth Tranebjærg;Sue Bellman;Christopher Wren

  • Identification of the gene for oral-facial-digital type I syndrome.

    Maria I. Ferrante;Sally A. Feather;Alessandro Bulfone;Victoria Wright

  • Uniparental paternal disomy in Angelman's syndrome

    S. Malcolm;J. Clayton-Smith;M. Nichols;M.E. Pembrey

  • A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism, enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene

    Maria Bitner-Glindzicz;Keith J. Lindley;Paul Rutland;Diana Blaydon

  • Clinical studies on submicroscopic subtelomeric rearrangements: a checklist.

    B B A de Vries;S M White;S J L Knight;R Regan

  • Meta-analysis of 13 genome scans reveals multiple cleft lip/palate genes with novel loci on 9q21 and 2q32-35

    Mary L. Marazita;Jeffrey C. Murray;Andrew C. Lidral;Mauricio Arcos-Burgos

  • Localization of human immunoglobulin kappa light chain variable region genes to the short arm of chromosome 2 by in situ hybridization

    S Malcolm;P Barton;C Murphy;M A Ferguson-Smith

  • Fibroblast growth factor receptors: lessons from the genes.

    David Burke;David Wilkes;Tom L. Blundell;Sue Malcolm

  • OFD1 Is a Centrosomal/Basal Body Protein Expressed during Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition in Human Nephrogenesis

    Leila Romio;Andrew M. Fry;Paul J.D. Winyard;Sue Malcolm

  • Multiplex PCR of three dinucleotide repeats in the Prader-Willi/Angelman critical region (15q11–q13): molecular diagnosis and mechanism of uniparental disomy

    Apiwat Mutirangura;Frank Greenberg;Merlin G. Butler;Sue Malcolm

  • Minimal definition of the imprinting center and fixation of chromosome 15q11-q13 epigenotype by imprinting mutations.

    Shinji Saitoh;Karin Buiting;Peter K. Rogan;Jessica L. Buxton

  • Identification of susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a two stage genome scan of affected sib-pairs

    N.J. Prescott;M.M. Lees;R.M. Winter;S. Malcolm

  • Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome: implications for imprint-switch models, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis.

    K. Buiting;B. Dittrich;S. Gross;C. Lich

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin M. Winter
Robin M. Winter Northwick Park Hospital
Adrian S. Woolf
Adrian S. Woolf University of Manchester
Christine Kinnon
Christine Kinnon University College London
Judith A. Goodship
Judith A. Goodship Newcastle University
Natalie J. Prescott
Natalie J. Prescott King's College London
Robert D. Nicholls
Robert D. Nicholls University of Pittsburgh
William Reardon
William Reardon Children's Health Ireland
Jill Clayton-Smith
Jill Clayton-Smith University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics in the USA often opens doors to a variety of connected educational paths and careers in healthcare and research. If you’re seeking a flexible entry into healthcare, consider specialized paths like nursing schools without entrance exam requirements, which can streamline access for eligible candidates.

For those targeting quick workforce entry, 10 month lpn program options offer a fast-track route into the nursing field, while still providing essential clinical experience. If you’re aiming for more advanced or leadership roles, evaluating the mha degree cost can help you plan for an affordable transition into healthcare administration.

Ambitious students interested in research or high-level teaching can benefit from pursuing an online doctorate in nursing. This option blends academic growth with the convenience of remote study. Whether your path is clinical or research-based, these diverse online degree options can support a wide range of genetics-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Sue Malcolm

Recently Published Articles