World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
10893
World Ranking
8644
National Ranking
3707

Steven W. McLaughlin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven W. McLaughlin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 229 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Steven W. McLaughlin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven W. McLaughlin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Telecommunications
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Computer network

Steven W. McLaughlin mainly focuses on Low-density parity-check code, Theoretical computer science, Algorithm, Communication channel and Electronic engineering. His Low-density parity-check code research includes elements of Block code, Error detection and correction and Puncturing. He interconnects Wireless and Computer network in the investigation of issues within Error detection and correction.

His Theoretical computer science research integrates issues from Forward error correction and Cryptography. His study in the field of Space–time code and Multi-user MIMO is also linked to topics like Constraint. His Electronic engineering study incorporates themes from Transmitter and Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing, MIMO, MIMO-OFDM.

His most cited work include:

  • Wireless Information-Theoretic Security (1493 citations)
  • Broadband MIMO-OFDM wireless communications (1235 citations)
  • Fading Channels: InformationTheoretic and Communications Aspects (491 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Steven W. McLaughlin mostly deals with Algorithm, Communication channel, Low-density parity-check code, Theoretical computer science and Decoding methods. His study in Communication channel is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Electronic engineering, Computer network, Secrecy and Computer data storage. Steven W. McLaughlin has included themes like Wireless, Physical layer, Key distribution in wireless sensor networks and Transmission in his Computer network study.

Steven W. McLaughlin works mostly in the field of Wireless, limiting it down to topics relating to Fading and, in certain cases, Channel state information, as a part of the same area of interest. His work deals with themes such as Parallel computing, Quantum key distribution, Binary erasure channel, Error detection and correction and Puncturing, which intersect with Low-density parity-check code. His work in the fields of Theoretical computer science, such as Coding theory, intersects with other areas such as Information theory.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Algorithm (32.16%)
  • Communication channel (25.73%)
  • Low-density parity-check code (23.98%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2015)?

  • Computer network (15.20%)
  • Secrecy (7.60%)
  • Communication channel (25.73%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Steven W. McLaughlin mainly investigates Computer network, Secrecy, Communication channel, Low-density parity-check code and Theoretical computer science. His Computer network study combines topics in areas such as Wireless, Physical layer and Transmission. Particularly relevant to Channel capacity is his body of work in Communication channel.

His Low-density parity-check code study which covers Binary erasure channel that intersects with Erasure. Steven W. McLaughlin combines subjects such as Algorithm, Cryptography, Puncturing and Code with his study of Theoretical computer science. His studies in Code integrate themes in fields like Communications security, Error detection and correction and Secure communication.

Between 2009 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • LDPC Codes for the Gaussian Wiretap Channel (181 citations)
  • Wireless Secrecy Regions With Friendly Jamming (143 citations)
  • Coding for Secrecy: An Overview of Error-Control Coding Techniques for Physical-Layer Security (133 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Telecommunications
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Computer network

His main research concerns Computer network, Secrecy, Computer security, Wireless and Eavesdropping. As part of his studies on Computer network, Steven W. McLaughlin often connects relevant areas like Transmission. His studies deal with areas such as Tunstall coding, Channel state information, Forward error correction and Fading as well as Computer security.

His Wireless research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Energy consumption, Wireless sensor network, Efficient energy use and Encryption. His Eavesdropping research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Communication channel, Bit error rate, Maximum a posteriori estimation, Error floor and Information-theoretic security. His Communication channel study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Decoding methods, Low-density parity-check code, Theoretical computer science and Cryptography.

Best Publications

  • Broadband MIMO-OFDM wireless communications

    G.L. Stuber;J.R. Barry;S.W. McLaughlin;Ye Li

  • Wireless Information-Theoretic Security

    M. Bloch;J. Barros;M.R.D. Rodrigues;S.W. McLaughlin

  • Fading Channels: InformationTheoretic and Communications Aspects

    Sergio VerdÂ;Steven W. McLaughlin

  • Energy efficiency based packet size optimization in wireless sensor networks

    Y. Sankarasubramaniam;I.F. Akyildiz;S.W. McLaughlin

  • Applications of LDPC Codes to the Wiretap Channel

    A. Thangaraj;S. Dihidar;A.R. Calderbank;S.W. McLaughlin

  • Rate-compatible puncturing of low-density parity-check codes

    Jeongseok Ha;Jaehong Kim;S.W. McLaughlin

  • LDPC Codes for the Gaussian Wiretap Channel

    D. Klinc;Jeongseok Ha;S. W. McLaughlin;J. Barros

  • Rate-compatible punctured low-density parity-check codes with short block lengths

    Jeongseok Ha;Jaehong Kim;D. Klinc;S.W. McLaughlin

  • Wireless Secrecy Regions With Friendly Jamming

    João P Vilela;Matthieu Bloch;João Barros;Steven W McLaughlin

  • Coding for Secrecy: An Overview of Error-Control Coding Techniques for Physical-Layer Security

    W. K. Harrison;J. Almeida;M. R. Bloch;S. W. McLaughlin

  • Storage system employing high-rate code with constraint on run length between occurrences of an influential pattern

    Robert Leslie Cloke;Patrick James Lee;Steven William McLaughlin

  • Strong Secrecy on the Binary Erasure Wiretap Channel Using Large-Girth LDPC Codes

    A. Subramanian;A. Thangaraj;M. Bloch;S. W. McLaughlin

  • Generalized partial-response targets for perpendicular recording with jitter noise

    P. Kovintavewat;I. Ozgunes;E. Kurtas;J.R. Barry

  • The design of efficiently-encodable rate-compatible LDPC codes - [transactions papers]

    Jaehong Kim;A. Ramamoorthy;S. Mclaughlin

  • Joint timing recovery and turbo equalization for coded partial response channels

    A.R. Nayak;J.R. Barry;S.W. McLaughlin

  • An efficient Chase decoder for turbo product codes

    C. Argon;S.W. McLaughlin

  • LDPC-based Gaussian key reconciliation

    M. Bloch;A. Thangaraj;S.W. McLaughlin;J.-M. Merolla

  • LDPC codes for the Gaussian wiretap channel

    Demijan Kline;Jeongseok Ha;Steven W. McLaughlin;Joao Barros

  • On space-time-frequency coding over MIMO-OFDM systems

    M. Fozunbal;S.W. McLaughlin;R.W. Schafer

  • Optimal binary index assignments for a class of equiprobable scalar and vector quantizers

    S.W. McLaughlin;D.L. Neuhoff;J.J. Ashley

  • Comments on Broadcast Channels

    Sergio VerdÂ;Steven W. McLaughlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Joao Barros
Joao Barros University of Porto
Matthieu R. Bloch
Matthieu R. Bloch Georgia Institute of Technology
John R. Barry
John R. Barry Georgia Institute of Technology
Faramarz Fekri
Faramarz Fekri Georgia Institute of Technology
David L. Neuhoff
David L. Neuhoff University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
A.R. Calderbank
A.R. Calderbank Duke University
Ronald W. Schafer
Ronald W. Schafer Georgia Institute of Technology
Miguel R. D. Rodrigues
Miguel R. D. Rodrigues University College London
Ali Adibi
Ali Adibi Georgia Institute of Technology
Xiaoli Ma
Xiaoli Ma Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens opportunities beyond traditional four-year degrees. Many students consider 1 year associate degree programs online, which offer a fast pathway into tech careers or further study. These programs are ideal for anyone wanting a quick start in computer science fundamentals.

If you’re looking to boost employability even further, easy certifications to get online can help you specialize and stand out, often with flexible schedules and minimal prerequisites. Popular choices include certifications in areas like cybersecurity, data analytics, and cloud computing.

For those ready for graduate study, there are shortest master degree programs that can be completed in 12–18 months. These accelerated options help advance your career quickly while staying current with industry demands.

Choosing most useful graduate degrees is also key. Specialized master’s programs in computer science, data science, or artificial intelligence continue to be highly valued by employers, leading to strong job prospects and competitive salaries.

Best Scientists Citing Steven W. McLaughlin

Recently Published Articles