World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
8821
World Ranking
12883
National Ranking
5196

Matthieu R. Bloch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthieu R. Bloch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthieu R. Bloch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthieu R. Bloch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthieu R. Bloch is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans several areas within computer science and engineering, with a focus on topics related to information security, wireless communications, and cryptography.

Their body of work includes publications in prominent venues such as the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, and arXiv (Cornell University). The primary fields of study to which Matthieu R. Bloch contributes are Computer Science and Engineering, with subfields including Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering.

Key research topics associated with Matthieu R. Bloch include:

  • Wireless Communication Security Techniques
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
  • Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Notable recent publications by Matthieu R. Bloch include:

  • "An Overview of Information-Theoretic Security and Privacy: Metrics, Limits and Applications" (2021), published in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory

Frequent collaborators in their research include Edmund Yeh, Christina Fragouli, Parastoo Sadeghi, Onur Günlü, and Rafael F. Schaefer. These coauthors have contributed significantly alongside Matthieu R. Bloch to advancing research primarily in information theory and security.

Their work is frequently published across various respected venues including:

  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory
  • 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

Among recent papers influenced by or connected with Matthieu R. Bloch's research interests are works such as "Secure Integrated Sensing and Communication" (2023), "Rate and Detection-Error Exponent Tradeoff for Joint Communication and Sensing of Fixed Channel States" (2023), and "Keyless Covert Communication via Channel State Information" (2021). These publications reflect ongoing efforts in integrating sensing, communication, and security in wireless systems.

Best Publications

  • Wireless Information-Theoretic Security

    M. Bloch;J. Barros;M.R.D. Rodrigues;S.W. McLaughlin

  • Physical-Layer Security: From Information Theory to Security Engineering

    Unknown

  • Physical-Layer Security: From Information Theory to Security Engineering

    Matthieu Bloch;Joo Barros

  • Covert Communication Over Noisy Channels: A Resolvability Perspective

    Matthieu R. Bloch

  • Strong Secrecy From Channel Resolvability

    Matthieu R. Bloch;J. Nicholas Laneman

  • Cooperative Security at the Physical Layer: A Summary of Recent Advances

    R. Bassily;E. Ekrem;Xiang He;E. Tekin

  • Wireless Secrecy Regions With Friendly Jamming

    João P Vilela;Matthieu Bloch;João Barros;Steven W McLaughlin

  • Coding for Secrecy: An Overview of Error-Control Coding Techniques for Physical-Layer Security

    W. K. Harrison;J. Almeida;M. R. Bloch;S. W. McLaughlin

  • Two approaches for ultrafast random bit generation based on the chaotic dynamics of a semiconductor laser

    Nianqiang Li;Byungchil Kim;V N Chizhevsky;A Locquet

  • Polar Coding for Secret-Key Generation

    Remi A. Chou;Matthieu R. Bloch;Emmanuel Abbe

  • Error-Control Coding for Physical-Layer Secrecy

    Matthieu Bloch;Masahito Hayashi;Andrew Thangaraj

  • Strong Secrecy on the Binary Erasure Wiretap Channel Using Large-Girth LDPC Codes

    A. Subramanian;A. Thangaraj;M. Bloch;S. W. McLaughlin

  • An Overview of Information-Theoretic Security and Privacy: Metrics, Limits and Applications

    Matthieu Bloch;Onur Gunlu;Aylin Yener;Frederique Oggier

  • Strongly Secure Communications Over the Two-Way Wiretap Channel

    A. J. Pierrot;M. R. Bloch

  • On the secrecy capacity of arbitrary wiretap channels

    M. Bloch;J.N. Laneman

  • Keyless covert communication over Multiple-Access Channels

    Keerthi Suria Kumar Arumugam;Matthieu R. Bloch

  • Arbitrary jamming can preclude secure communication

    Ebrahim MolavianJazi;Matthieu Bloch;J. Nicholas Laneman

  • Polar Coding for the Broadcast Channel With Confidential Messages: A Random Binning Analogy

    Remi A. Chou;Matthieu R. Bloch

  • LDPC-based Gaussian key reconciliation

    M. Bloch;A. Thangaraj;S.W. McLaughlin;J.-M. Merolla

  • First- and Second-Order Asymptotics in Covert Communication

    Mehrdad Tahmasbi;Matthieu R. Bloch

  • Separation of Reliability and Secrecy in Rate-Limited Secret-Key Generation

    Remi A. Chou;Matthieu R. Bloch

  • Friendly Jamming for Wireless Secrecy

    J. P. Vilela;M. Bloch;J. Barros;S. W. McLaughlin

  • LDPC-based secret key agreement over the Gaussian wiretap channel

    M. Bloch;A. Thangaraj;S.W. McLaughlin;J.-M. Merolla

  • Strong Secrecy for Erasure Wiretap Channels

    Ananda T. Suresh;Arunkumar Subramanian;Andrew Thangaraj;Matthieu Bloch

Frequent Co-Authors

Aria Nosratinia
Aria Nosratinia The University of Texas at Dallas
Joao Barros
Joao Barros University of Porto
Steven W. McLaughlin
Steven W. McLaughlin Georgia Institute of Technology
Aylin Yener
Aylin Yener The Ohio State University
J. Nicholas Laneman
J. Nicholas Laneman University of Notre Dame
Miguel R. D. Rodrigues
Miguel R. D. Rodrigues University College London
Stephen McLaughlin
Stephen McLaughlin Heriot-Watt University
Eleni Diamanti
Eleni Diamanti Université Paris Cité
Vincent Y. F. Tan
Vincent Y. F. Tan National University of Singapore
Philippe Grangier
Philippe Grangier University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities for students interested in computer science. Many universities in the USA now offer fast track computer science degree programs. These accelerated online options allow you to complete your studies more quickly, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

If your interests overlap with sustainability or engineering, pursuing an environmental engineering degree online can equip you to tackle real-world ecological challenges. Mechanical engineering is another closely related discipline, and understanding the mechanical engineering degree online cost can help you plan your educational investment more effectively.

For those interested in the foundations of technology and advanced problem-solving, a bachelor of science in physics online is a versatile pathway leading to roles in data analysis, research, and innovation.

Online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and a wide array of specializations. Exploring these pathways can enhance your skills and expand your career prospects in STEM fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matthieu R. Bloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles