World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen J. Rassenti

Stephen J. Rassenti

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
35
Citations
5181
World Ranking
2954
National Ranking
1633

Stephen J. Rassenti publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Rassenti sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 108 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Stephen J. Rassenti D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Rassenti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. Rassenti is affiliated with Chapman University in the United States and works primarily in the social sciences, decision sciences, and business, management and accounting. Their research contributions include studies in safety research, general decision sciences, demography, accounting, and gender studies.

Their recent scholarly output includes three publications: "Trustors' disregard for trustees deciding quickly or slowly in three experiments with time constraints" (2022) published in Scientific Reports; "An investigation of health insurance policy and behavior in a virtual environment" (2021) in PLoS ONE; and "The No-Arbitrage Hypothesis and Inertia in Forward Markets1" (2023) featured in the SSRN Electronic Journal.

Research topics addressed by Stephen J. Rassenti span a diverse range of fields including:

  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Electric Power System Optimization

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stephen J. Rassenti include:

  • Praveen Kujal
  • Antonio Cabrales
  • Antonio M. Espín
  • J. Dustin Tracy
  • Kevin A. James

Their work has been published in venues reflecting a broad academic impact, including:

  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation

    Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith;Robert L. Bulfin

  • Combinatorial auction design

    David P. Porter;Stephen J. Rassenti;Anil Roopnarine;Vernon L. Smith

  • Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games

    Kevin A. McCabe;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

  • Controlling market power and price spikes in electricity networks: Demand-side bidding

    Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith;Bart J. Wilson

  • Adaptation and convergence of behavior in repeated experimental Cournot games

    Stephen Rassenti;Stanley S. Reynolds;Vernon L. Smith;Ferenc Szidarovszky

  • Smart Computer-Assisted Markets

    Kevin A. Mccabe;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

  • Theory, experiment and the federal communications commission spectrum auctions

    Jeffrey Banks;Mark Olson;David Porter;Stephen Rassenti

  • Reciprocity, Trust, and Payoff Privacy in Extensive Form Bargaining

    Kevin A McCabe;Stephen J Rassenti;Vernon L Smith

  • The Design of "Smart" Water Market Institutions Using Laboratory Experiments*

    James J. Murphy;Ariel Dinar;Richard E. Howitt;Steven J. Rassenti

  • Discriminatory price auctions in electricity markets: low volatility at the expense of high price levels

    Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith;Bart J. Wilson

  • Bertrand-Edgeworth competition in experimental markets

    J. Brown Kruse;S. Rassenti;S. S. Reynolds;V. L. Smith

  • Auction Institutional Design: Theory and Behavior of Simultaneous Multiple Unit Generalizations of the Dutch and English Auctions

    Vernon L. Smith;K. A. McCabe;S. J. Rassenti

  • Designing ‘smart’ computer-assisted markets: An experimental auction for gas networks

    Kevin A. McCabe;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

  • Using Experiments to Inform the Privatization/Deregulation Movement in Electricity

    Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith;Bart J. Wilson

  • Designing a Uniform-Price Double Auction: An Experimental Evaluation

    Kevin A. McCabe;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

  • The design, testing and implementation of Virginia's NOx allowance auction

    David Porter;Stephen J. Rassenti;William Shobe;Vernon L. Smith

  • To trust, or not to trust: Cognitive reflection in trust games

    Brice Corgnet;Antonio M. Espín;Roberto Hernán-González;Praveen Kujal

  • Spot market mechanism design and competitivity issues in electric power

    Michael J. Denton;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

  • Designing Call Auction Institutions: Is Double Dutch The Best?

    Kevin A. McCabe;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

  • Cotenancy and competition in an experimental auction market for natural gas pipeline networks

    Stephen J. Rassenti;Stanley S. Reynolds;Vernon L. Smit

  • Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games

    Kevin A. McCabe;Stephen J. Rassenti;Vernon L. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Vernon L. Smith
Vernon L. Smith Chapman University
Kevin McCabe
Kevin McCabe George Mason University
David Porter
David Porter Chapman University
Hillard Kaplan
Hillard Kaplan Chapman University
Ariel Dinar
Ariel Dinar University of California, Riverside
Richard E. Howitt
Richard E. Howitt University of California, Davis
Ferenc Szidarovszky
Ferenc Szidarovszky Corvinus University of Budapest
Jeffrey S. Banks
Jeffrey S. Banks California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens up diverse opportunities in business, banking, and beyond. For those seeking flexible study options, online programs are an excellent choice. A great starting point is a bachelor's degree in finance, which builds core skills in financial analysis, investments, and management.

If you’re looking to advance your qualifications quickly, accelerated mba programs online offer a fast track to leadership roles across various industries—including finance, economics, and project management.

Specialized career paths such as project management are also highly relevant. To understand compensation expectations, you can review recent trends in project management degree salary data. Alternatively, if your interests are in accounting and financial record-keeping, earning a bookkeeping certification online can quickly boost your professional profile and open doors to entry-level finance roles.

Choosing the right degree or certificate helps you excel in today’s competitive job market—whether you aim to enter, specialize, or advance in economics or finance.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Rassenti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles