World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 56 11928 3202 176 8248

Stanley L. Hem publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stanley L. Hem between 1967 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stanley L. Hem published across 48 years, from 1967 to 2014, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1981. 2 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1981. 1967: 2 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 4 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication
1967 2014

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stanley L. Hem: publications per year, 1967 to 2014
Year Publications
1967 2
1968 0
1969 0
1970 2
1971 0
1972 1
1973 4
1974 3
1975 7
1976 7
1977 4
1978 5
1979 5
1980 5
1981 9
1982 6
1983 7
1984 8
1985 4
1986 5
1987 6
1988 2
1989 6
1990 1
1991 6
1992 2
1993 5
1994 6
1995 6
1996 2
1997 4
1998 2
1999 5
2000 5
2001 4
2002 4
2003 8
2004 5
2005 2
2006 3
2007 6
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 1
2013 1
2014 1
Total 183
Download as CSV

Stanley L. Hem publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley L. Hem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 176 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 176
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Stanley L. Hem D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley L. Hem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051 56
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stanley L. Hem was affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their career contributed to the academic community during their tenure at this institution.

There are no records of recent papers or specific research publications associated with Stanley L. Hem available for reference. Similarly, there is no detailed data on frequent co-authors or typical publication venues linked to their work.

Information about fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics connected to Stanley L. Hem has not been documented in the accessible sources. Likewise, no book publications or awards have been listed in relation to their academic career.

Stanley L. Hem is deceased, and their contributions are thus reflected through the historical context of their academic affiliation and professional activity rather than ongoing research output.

Best Publications

  • Role of aluminum-containing adjuvants in antigen internalization by dendritic cells in vitro

    Garry L. Morefield;Anna Sokolovska;Dongping Jiang;Harm HogenEsch

  • Relationship between physical and chemical properties of aluminum-containing adjuvants and immunopotentiation

    Stanley L Hem;Harm Hogenesch

  • In vivo absorption of aluminium-containing vaccine adjuvants using 26Al

    Richard E. Flarend;Stanley L. Hem;Joe L. White;David Elmore

  • Activation of dendritic cells and induction of CD4(+) T cell differentiation by aluminum-containing adjuvants.

    Anna Sokolovska;Stanley L. Hem;Harm HogenEsch

  • Aluminum Compounds Used as Adjuvants in Vaccines

    Suhag Shirodkar;Robert L. Hutchinson;Darold L. Perry;Joe L. White

  • PREDICTING THE ADSORPTION OF PROTEINS BY ALUMINIUM-CONTAINING ADJUVANTS

    Sally J. Seeber;Joe L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • A preliminary study of the dermal absorption of aluminium from antiperspirants using aluminium-26.

    R Flarend;T Bin;D Elmore;S.L Hem

  • Mechanism of Adsorption of Clindamycin and Tetracycline by Montmorillonite

    Linda S. Porubcan;Carlos J. Serna;Joe L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • Contribution of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions to the adsorption of proteins by aluminium-containing adjuvants.

    Ragheb H. Al-Shakhshir;Fred E. Regnier;Joe L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • Potentiation of the immune response to non-adsorbed antigens by aluminum-containing adjuvants

    Ilia Z. Romero Méndez;Yi Shi;Harm HogenEsch;Stanley L. Hem

  • Relationship between the strength of antigen adsorption to an aluminum-containing adjuvant and the immune response.

    Bethany Hansen;Anna Sokolovska;Harm HogenEsch;Stanley L. Hem

  • Effect of surface charge on the stability of oil/water emulsions during steam sterilization

    Gaysorn Chansiri;Robert T. Lyons;Mahesh V. Patel;Stanley L. Hem

  • Structure and Properties of Aluminum-Containing Adjuvants

    Stanley L. Hem;Joe L. White

  • Relationship between the degree of antigen adsorption to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant in interstitial fluid and antibody production

    Seema Iyer;Harm HogenEsch;Stanley L Hem

  • Anion-Aluminum Hydroxide Gel Interactions1

    Carlos J. Serna;J. L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • Structure of Aluminum Hydroxide Gel I: Initial Precipitate

    Steven L. Nail;Joe L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • Effect of the strength of adsorption of hepatitis B surface antigen to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant on the immune response.

    Bethany Hansen;Mary Belfast;George Soung;Liping Song

  • Hydrolysis of aluminum-tri-(sec-butoxide) in ionic and nonionic media

    Carlos J. Serna;Joe L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • Aluminum chlorohydrate I: Structure studies

    Dirk L. Teagarden;John F. Kozlowski;Joe L. White;Stanley L. Hem

  • Measuring the surface area of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant

    Cliff T. Johnston;Shan‐Li Wang;Stanley L. Hem

Frequent Co-Authors

Harm HogenEsch
Harm HogenEsch Purdue University West Lafayette
Fred E. Regnier
Fred E. Regnier Purdue University West Lafayette
Cliff T. Johnston
Cliff T. Johnston Purdue University West Lafayette
David Elmore
David Elmore Purdue University West Lafayette
Richard H. Guy
Richard H. Guy University of Bath
Lawrence J. Lesko
Lawrence J. Lesko University of Florida
David L. Bish
David L. Bish Indiana University
Manmohan Singh
Manmohan Singh Beam Therapeutics
Johannes Löwer
Johannes Löwer Paul Ehrlich Institut
Nobuo Otsuka
Nobuo Otsuka Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized fields that combine science with practical applications. For those interested in healthcare, becoming a pharmacist is a prestigious career, but understanding how much does it cost to become a pharmacist is crucial before committing to the journey.

Alternatively, if you have a keen interest in forensic science, pursuing a forensic science online degree can equip you with the technical skills needed for investigative roles.

For those drawn to the medical and legal intersection, exploring how to become a medical examiner assistant offers a fascinating career path that supports criminal investigations and public health.

Lastly, enhancing your expertise with a master's in forensic psychology online provides advanced knowledge about criminal behavior and psychological evaluation, expanding your opportunities in both forensic and mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley L. Hem

Recently Published Articles