World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
92
Citations
28528
World Ranking
1902
National Ranking
106

S.S. Davis publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S.S. Davis sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 403 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

S.S. Davis D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S.S. Davis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

S.S. Davis is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile includes a focus on scientific research within the university setting, contributing to the institution's scholarly activities.

While specific details of their recent publications are not listed, Davis's professional activity is associated with the University of Nottingham, a notable academic environment for research and higher education in the UK.

The available data does not specify particular areas of study, subfields, or main topics of research. However, the academic position held indicates involvement in advancing knowledge through research, teaching, or both within their discipline.

No information is available regarding coauthors or frequent collaboration networks, suggesting that these aspects of Davis's scholarly contributions are either not extensively recorded or do not feature prominently within the data.

Similarly, there is no mention of books authored or chapters contributed by Davis, indicating the primary mode of scholarly communication may be journal articles, conference proceedings, or other formats not detailed here.

There are no records of awards or formal recognitions linked to Davis, which focuses the profile strictly on academic affiliation and related research engagement as presented.

Best Publications

  • Effect of chitosan on the permeability of monolayers of intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2).

    Per Artursson;Tuulikki Lindmark;Stanley S. Davis;Lisbeth Illum

  • Long circulating microparticulate drug carriers

    S. Stolnik;L. Illum;S.S. Davis

  • The preparation and characterization of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. II: The entrapment of a model protein using a (water-in-oil)-in-water emulsion solvent evaporation technique

    Hayley Jeffery;Stanley S. Davis;Derek T. O'Hagan

  • Drug delivery in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles surface modified with poloxamer 407 and poloxamine 908: in vitro characterisation and in vivo evaluation.

    H.M. Redhead;S.S. Davis;L. Illum

  • Evaluation of the clearance characteristics of bioadhesive systems in humans.

    R.J Soane;M Frier;A.C Perkins;N.S Jones

  • Polylactide−Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers as Drug Delivery Systems. 1. Characterization of Water Dispersible Micelle-Forming Systems

    S. A. Hagan;A. G. A. Coombes;M. C. Garnett;S. E. Dunn

  • The organ distribution and circulation time of intravenously injected colloidal carriers sterically stabilized with a blockcopolymer - poloxamine 908

    Lisbeth Illum;S.S. Davis;R.H. Müller;E. Mak

  • Surface modification of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres by biodegradable poly(lactide)-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymers.

    Snjezana Stolnik;Susan E. Dunn;Martin C. Garnett;Martyn C. Davies

  • Non-phagocytic uptake of intravenously injected microspheres in rat spleen: Influence of particle size and hydrophilic coating

    Seyed Moghimi;C. J.H. Porter;I. S. Muir;L. Illum

  • Physicochemical Evaluation of Nanoparticles Assembled from Poly(lactic acid)−Poly(ethylene glycol) (PLA−PEG) Block Copolymers as Drug Delivery Vehicles

    T. Riley;S. Stolnik;C. R. Heald;C. D. Xiong

  • Coating particles with a block co-polymer (poloxamine-908) suppresses opsonization but permits the activity of dysopsonins in the serum

    Seyed Moghimi;I. S. Muir;L. Illum;S. S. Davis

  • COLLOIDAL STABILITY AND DRUG INCORPORATION ASPECTS OF MICELLAR-LIKE PLA-PEG NANOPARTICLES

    T Riley;T Govender;S Stolnik;C.D Xiong

  • Protein-loaded poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles for oral administration: formulation, structural and release characteristics

    H Rafati;A.G.A Coombes;J Adler;J Holland

  • The preparation and characterisation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. I: Oil-in-water emulsion solvent evaporation

    H. Jeffery;S.S. Davis;D.T. O'Hagan

  • The organ uptake of intravenously administered colloidal particles can be altered using a non‐ionic surfactant (Poloxamer 338)

    Unknown

  • Preparation of ultrafine silica- and PEG-coated magnetite particles

    M.D Butterworth;L Illum;S.S Davis

  • Surface characteristics and the interaction of colloidal particles with mouse peritoneal macrophages

    L. Illum;L.O. Jacobsen;R.H. Müller;E. Mak

  • Polystyrene-poly (ethylene glycol) (PS-PEG2000) particles as model systems for site specific drug delivery. 2. The effect of PEG surface density on the in vitro cell interaction and in vivo biodistribution.

    Susan E. Dunn;Anne Brindley;Stanley S. Davis;Martyn C. Davies

  • The polyoxyethylene/polyoxypropylene block co‐polymer Poloxamer‐407 selectively redirects intravenously injected microspheres to sinusoidal endothelial cells of rabbit bone marrow

    Christopher J.H. Porter;S.Moein Moghimi;Lisbeth Illum;Stanley S. Davis

  • An investigation of the filtration capacity and the fate of large filtered sterically-stabilized microspheres in rat spleen

    Seyed Moghimi;H. Hedeman;I. S. Muir;L. Illum

  • Clearance characteristics of chitosan based formulations in the sheep nasal cavity.

    R.J Soane;M Hinchcliffe;S.S Davis;S.S Davis;L Illum;L Illum

  • Poly(lactic acid)−Poly(ethylene oxide) (PLA−PEG) Nanoparticles: NMR Studies of the Central Solidlike PLA Core and the Liquid PEG Corona

    C. R. Heald;S. Stolnik;K. S. Kujawinski;C. De Matteis

  • The effect of hydrophilic coatings on the uptake of colloidal particles by the liver and by peritoneal macrophages

    L. Ilium;I.M. Hunneyball;S.S. Davis

  • Atomic force microscopy of gastric mucin and chitosan mucoadhesive systems.

    Matthew P. Deacon;Simon McGURK;Clive J. Roberts;Phillip M. Williams

  • Preparation of sub-100 nm human serum albumin nanospheres using a pH-coacervation method.

    W Lin;A G Coombes;M C Davies;S S Davis

  • In vitro cell interaction and in vivo biodistribution of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres surface modified by poloxamer and poloxamine copolymers

    Susan E Dunn;Allan G.A Coombes;Martin C Garnett;Stanley S Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek O'hagan
Derek O'hagan GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Ed C. Lavelle
Ed C. Lavelle Trinity College Dublin
Stephen E. Harding
Stephen E. Harding University of Nottingham
Michel Vert
Michel Vert University of Montpellier
Etienne Schacht
Etienne Schacht Ghent University
Christopher J.H. Porter
Christopher J.H. Porter Monash University
Diane J. Burgess
Diane J. Burgess University of Connecticut
David A. Barrett
David A. Barrett University of Nottingham
John F. Watts
John F. Watts University of Surrey
Clive J. Roberts
Clive J. Roberts University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields, particularly in forensic science and criminal investigation. For those interested in working directly with forensic evidence, roles such as an autopsy technician offer hands-on experience in pathology. To learn more about the educational requirements, salary expectations, and job outlook in this field, check out this insightful guide on autopsy tech.

Pursuing an online forensic degree can be an affordable and flexible way to advance your knowledge in crime lab techniques and forensic chemistry. Many accredited programs offer comprehensive curricula designed to prepare students for diverse forensic roles. For a curated list, consider exploring the options for forensic degree online.

For professionals aiming to deepen their expertise in the psychological aspects of criminal behavior, an online masters degree in forensic psychology provides specialized training that blends psychology with legal studies. This advanced degree can lead to careers that require both scientific knowledge and psychological insight.

Overall, careers in forensic science vary widely, ranging from crime scene analysis to laboratory research and courtroom consulting. To explore diverse roles and their related qualifications, salaries, and career trajectories, visit the comprehensive overview on forensic career paths.

Best Scientists Citing S.S. Davis

Trending Scientists