What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Secession, Mathematical economics, Nash equilibrium, Microeconomics and Fiscal federalism.
The Secession study combines topics in areas such as Returns to scale, Empirical research, Economic system and Development economics.
In the subject of general Mathematical economics, his work in Equilibrium selection and Core is often linked to Domain, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
His Equilibrium selection study combines topics in areas such as Best response and Epsilon-equilibrium.
His research in the fields of Rivalry, Product differentiation and Competition overlaps with other disciplines such as Order.
Shlomo Weber has included themes like Capital, Tax competition, Federalism, Investment and Productivity in his Fiscal federalism study.
His most cited work include:
- Strong tiebout equilibrium under restricted preferences domain (153 citations)
- LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY AND REDISTRIBUTION (152 citations)
- The Art of Making Everybody Happy: How to Prevent a Secession (104 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Mathematical economics, Microeconomics, Public good, Core and Stability.
As part of his studies on Mathematical economics, Shlomo Weber frequently links adjacent subjects like Jurisdiction.
His work on Competition, Total cost and Marginal cost as part of general Microeconomics research is often related to Product, thus linking different fields of science.
Shlomo Weber interconnects Production, Empirical research, Secession and Public economics in the investigation of issues within Public good.
Shlomo Weber usually deals with Empirical research and limits it to topics linked to Returns to scale and Breakup.
His research on Secession often connects related topics like Economic system.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mathematical economics (29.47%)
- Microeconomics (28.02%)
- Public good (20.77%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Public good (20.77%)
- Diversity index (6.28%)
- Positive economics (8.21%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Public good, Diversity index, Positive economics, Fractionalization and Utilitarianism.
His work carried out in the field of Public good brings together such families of science as Public economics, Alliance, Free riding, Hierarchy and Social consciousness.
His Hierarchy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Mechanism and Economic system.
Shlomo Weber combines subjects such as Linguistic diversity, Economics of language, Public policy and Polarization with his study of Fractionalization.
His study in Utilitarianism is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ranking, Shapley value and Normative.
His study explores the link between Language acquisition and topics such as Subsidy that cross with problems in Development economics.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Palgrave handbook of economics and language (15 citations)
- Ranking languages in the European Union: Before and after Brexit (11 citations)
- Ranking languages in the European Union: Before and after Brexit (11 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Diversity index, Linguistic diversity, Public economics, Nash equilibrium and Valence are his primary areas of study.
The concepts of his Linguistic diversity study are interwoven with issues in Fractionalization, Language acquisition, Positive economics and Polarization.
The various areas that Shlomo Weber examines in his Public economics study include Public good and Diversity.
His Public good study is concerned with the larger field of Microeconomics.
His study with Nash equilibrium involves better knowledge in Mathematical economics.
His study looks at the relationship between Valence and fields such as Voting, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
