World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6389
World Ranking
8529
National Ranking
3632

Scott O. Murray publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott O. Murray sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Scott O. Murray D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott O. Murray sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott O. Murray is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a specialization in cognitive neuroscience. Other subfields of study include cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, molecular biology, and polymers and plastics.

The core topics of their work encompass autism spectrum disorder research, neural dynamics and brain function, and functional brain connectivity studies. Additional research areas include visual perception and processing mechanisms, neuroscience and neural engineering, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and applications of conducting polymers.

Frequent publication venues for Scott O. Murray's work include the Journal of Vision, Autism Research, Nature Communications, Radiology, and the Journal of Neuroscience. The largest number of their publications appear in the Journal of Vision and Autism Research.

Scott O. Murray has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, notably Tamar Kolodny, Kristin Woodard, Michael-Paul Schallmo, Sara Jane Webb, and Jennifer Gerdts.

Recent papers authored by Scott O. Murray and colleagues include:

  • Concentrations of Cortical GABA and Glutamate in Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2020, Autism Research
  • Weaker neural suppression in autism, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Comparison of Multivendor Single-Voxel MR Spectroscopy Data Acquired in Healthy Brain at 26 Sites, 2020, Radiology
  • Response Dissociation in Hierarchical Cortical Circuits: a Unique Feature of Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Late fMRI Response Components Are Altered in Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex

    Scott O. Murray;Daniel Kersten;Bruno A. Olshausen;Paul Schrater

  • The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex

    Scott O. Murray;Huseyin Boyaci;Daniel J Kersten

  • Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex.

    Scott O Murray;Scott O Murray;Ewa Wojciulik

  • Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex

    Paola Binda;Maria Pereverzeva;Scott O. Murray

  • Hemispheric asymmetry in global/local processing: effects of stimulus position and spatial frequency.

    Shihui Han;Janelle A. Weaver;Scott O. Murray;Xiaojian Kang

  • Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1

    Fang Fang;Huseyin Boyaci;Daniel Kersten;Scott O. Murray

  • Orientation-tuned fMRI adaptation in human visual cortex

    Fang Fang;Scott O. Murray;Daniel J. Kersten;Sheng He

  • Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin ( Tursiops truncatus ): Repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule

    Eduardo Mercado;Scott O. Murray;Robert K. Uyeyama;Adam A. Pack

  • Perceptual grouping and the interactions between visual cortical areas

    Scott O. Murray;Paul Schrater;Daniel Kersten

  • Big GABA: Edited MR spectroscopy at 24 research sites

    Mark Mikkelsen;Mark Mikkelsen;Peter B. Barker;Peter B. Barker;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Maiken K. Brix

  • Processing shape, motion, and three-dimensional shape-from-motion in the human cortex

    Scott O. Murray;Bruno A. Olshausen;David L. Woods

  • Pupil constrictions to photographs of the sun

    Paola Binda;Paola Binda;Maria Pereverzeva;Scott O. Murray

  • Duration-Dependent fMRI Adaptation and Distributed Viewer-Centered Face Representation in Human Visual Cortex

    Fang Fang;Scott O. Murray;Sheng He

  • Characterizing the graded structure of false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) vocalizations.

    Scott O. Murray;Eduardo Mercado;Herbert L. Roitblat

  • Perceptual grouping and inverse fMRI activity patterns in human visual cortex.

    Fang Fang;Daniel Kersten;Scott O. Murray

  • Keeping a large-pupilled eye on high-level visual processing

    Paola Binda;Paola Binda;Scott O. Murray

  • The effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex are stimulus independent.

    Scott O. Murray

  • Pupil size reflects the focus of feature-based attention.

    Paola Binda;Maria Pereverzeva;Scott O. Murray

  • Enhanced Memory for Scenes Presented at Behaviorally Relevant Points in Time

    Jeffrey Y. Lin;Amanda D. Pype;Scott O. Murray;Geoffrey M. Boynton

  • Big GABA II: Water-referenced edited MR spectroscopy at 25 research sites

    Mark Mikkelsen;Mark Mikkelsen;Daniel L. Rimbault;Peter B. Barker;Peter B. Barker;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya

  • Capture of Attention to Threatening Stimuli without Perceptual Awareness

    Jeffrey Y. Lin;Scott O. Murray;Geoffrey M. Boynton

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey M. Boynton
Geoffrey M. Boynton University of Washington
Daniel Kersten
Daniel Kersten University of Minnesota
Raphael Bernier
Raphael Bernier University of Washington
Nicolaas A.J. Puts
Nicolaas A.J. Puts King's College London
Richard Anthony Edward Edden
Richard Anthony Edward Edden Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
David L. Woods
David L. Woods University of California, Davis
Lars Ersland
Lars Ersland University of Bergen
Martin Tegenthoff
Martin Tegenthoff Ruhr University Bochum
Timothy P.L. Roberts
Timothy P.L. Roberts Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jacobus F.A. Jansen
Jacobus F.A. Jansen Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Scott O. Murray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles