World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 51 14063 12659 1025 905 152 8430

Ryan Gilmour publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ryan Gilmour between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ryan Gilmour published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2018. 25 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2018. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 17 publications
2002 2025

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ryan Gilmour: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 9
2011 7
2012 6
2013 6
2014 6
2015 19
2016 10
2017 7
2018 20
2019 19
2020 13
2021 17
2022 18
2023 17
2024 8
2025 17
Total 214
Download as CSV

Ryan Gilmour publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan Gilmour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 152 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 152
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ryan Gilmour D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan Gilmour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861 51
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ryan Gilmour is a researcher affiliated with the University of Münster in Germany. Their research is primarily situated in the field of chemistry, with a particular focus on organic chemistry. They have contributed extensively to related subfields, including pharmaceutical science, materials chemistry, molecular biology, and inorganic chemistry.

Their work spans a range of scientific topics, emphasizing areas such as fluorine in organic chemistry, radical photochemical reactions, catalytic C-H functionalization methods, crystallization and solubility studies, X-ray diffraction in crystallography, carbohydrate chemistry and synthesis, and glycosylation and glycoproteins research.

Gilmour's publication record includes notable recent papers such as:

  • Advances in theE → ZIsomerization of Alkenes Using Small Molecule Photocatalysts, 2021, Chemical Reviews
  • Boron-enabled geometric isomerization of alkenes via selective energy-transfer catalysis, 2020, Science
  • Light-enabled deracemization of cyclopropanes by Al-salen photocatalysis, 2023, Nature
  • Enantioselective Synthesis of 3-Fluorochromanes via Iodine(I)/Iodine(III) Catalysis, 2020, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Expanding organofluorine chemical space: the design of chiral fluorinated isosteres enabled by I(i)/I(iii) catalysis, 2021, Chemical Science

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Constantin G. Daniliuc, Christian Mück-Lichtenfeld, Jessica Neufeld, Joel Häfliger, and John J. Molloy.

The venues where Gilmour has frequently published reflect a concentration in high-profile chemistry journals and databases:

  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Angewandte Chemie
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Chemical Science
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society

Best Publications

  • Advances in the E → Z Isomerization of Alkenes Using Small Molecule Photocatalysts.

    Tomáš Neveselý;Max Wienhold;John J. Molloy;Ryan Gilmour

  • A Bio-Inspired, Catalytic E → Z Isomerization of Activated Olefins

    Jan B. Metternich;Ryan Gilmour

  • Fluorine Conformational Effects in Organocatalysis: An Emerging Strategy for Molecular Design

    Lucie E. Zimmer;Christof Sparr;Ryan Gilmour

  • Positional and Geometrical Isomerisation of Alkenes: The Pinnacle of Atom Economy.

    John James Molloy;Tobias Morack;Ryan Gilmour

  • One Photocatalyst, n Activation Modes Strategy for Cascade Catalysis: Emulating Coumarin Biosynthesis with (−)-Riboflavin

    Jan B. Metternich;Ryan Gilmour

  • Catalytic Difluorination of Olefins.

    István Gábor Molnár;Ryan Gilmour

  • Boron-enabled geometric isomerization of alkenes via selective energy-transfer catalysis.

    John J. Molloy;Michael Schäfer;Max Wienhold;Tobias Morack

  • The Fluorine Gauche Effect: A Brief History

    Christian Thiehoff;Yannick P. Rey;Ryan Gilmour

  • Bioinspired Radical Stetter Reaction: Radical Umpolung Enabled by Ion-Pair Photocatalysis.

    Tobias Morack;Christian Mück‐Lichtenfeld;Ryan Gilmour

  • The Fluorine‐Iminium Ion Gauche Effect: Proof of Principle and Application to Asymmetric Organocatalysis

    Christof Sparr;W. Bernd Schweizer;Hans Martin Senn;Ryan Gilmour

  • Enantioselective, Catalytic Vicinal Difluorination of Alkenes

    Felix Scheidt;Michael Schäfer;Jérôme C. Sarie;Constantin G. Daniliuc

  • Photocatalytic E → Z Isomerization of Polarized Alkenes Inspired by the Visual Cycle: Mechanistic Dichotomy and Origin of Selectivity

    Jan B. Metternich;Denis G. Artiukhin;Mareike C. Holland;Maximilian von Bremen-Kühne

  • Contra-Thermodynamic, Photocatalytic E→Z Isomerization of Styrenyl Boron Species: Vectors to Facilitate Exploration of Two-Dimensional Chemical Space

    John J. Molloy;Jan B. Metternich;Jan B. Metternich;Constantin G. Daniliuc;Allan J. B. Watson

  • Informing Molecular Design by Stereoelectronic Theory: The Fluorine Gauche Effect in Catalysis.

    Marialuisa Aufiero;Ryan Gilmour

  • Fluorine‐Directed Glycosylation

    Christoph Bucher;Ryan Gilmour

  • Total syntheses of amphidinolide H and G.

    Alois Fürstner;Laure C. Bouchez;Jacques‐Alexis Funel;Vilnis Liepins

  • Photocatalytic E → Z Isomerization of Alkenes

    J. B. Metternich;R. Gilmour

  • Total Syntheses of Amphidinolides B1, B4, G1, H1 and Structure Revision of Amphidinolide H2

    Alois Fürstner;Laure C. Bouchez;Louis Morency;Jaques-Alexis Funel

  • Cyclopropyl Iminium Activation: Reactivity Umpolung in Enantioselective Organocatalytic Reaction Design

    Christof Sparr;Ryan Gilmour

  • Deconstructing covalent organocatalysis.

    Mareike C. Holland;Ryan Gilmour

  • Stereochemical Models for Discussing Additions to α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes Organocatalyzed by Diarylprolinol or Imidazolidinone Derivatives - Is There an '(E)/(Z) -Dilemma'?

    Dieter Seebach;Ryan Gilmour;Uroš Grošelj;Gildas Deniau

  • Stereochemical bias introduced during RNA synthesis modulates the activity of phosphorothioate siRNAs.

    Hartmut Jahns;Martina Roos;Jochen Imig;Fabienne Baumann

  • Konformative Fluoreffekte in der Organokatalyse: eine neuartige Strategie zum molekularen Design

    Lucie E. Zimmer;Christof Sparr;Ryan Gilmour

Frequent Co-Authors

Constantin G. Daniliuc
Constantin G. Daniliuc University of Münster
Christian Mück-Lichtenfeld
Christian Mück-Lichtenfeld University of Münster
Gerald Kehr
Gerald Kehr University of Münster
Andrew B. Holmes
Andrew B. Holmes University of Melbourne
Klaus Bergander
Klaus Bergander University of Münster
Alfons Baiker
Alfons Baiker ETH Zurich
Beat H. Meier
Beat H. Meier ETH Zurich
Jack D. Dunitz
Jack D. Dunitz ETH Zurich
Alois Fürstner
Alois Fürstner Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various related fields and career opportunities. For those interested in the healthcare industry, becoming a pharmacist is a popular path. However, many wonder, is it hard to become a pharmacist? This career demands rigorous education and licensing but offers rewarding professional stability.

Chemistry graduates can also explore roles in pharmaceutical sales. Understanding how much do drug reps make is important for those considering this dynamic and people-focused profession. Salaries vary but often reflect the candidate's expertise and networking skills.

Another interesting field related to chemistry is forensic science. Many students look for affordable education options and may choose online forensic science courses to gain specialized knowledge while balancing other commitments. These programs prepare students for diverse roles in criminal justice and research.

For those fascinated by biology and chemistry combined, becoming an autopsy tech offers a unique career path. Learn about the necessary education, salary, and job outlook by exploring autopsy tech opportunities. This field requires attention to detail and a strong scientific background.

Best Scientists Citing Ryan Gilmour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles