World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
105
Citations
41162
World Ranking
1194
National Ranking
15

Rune R. Frants publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rune R. Frants sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 365 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Rune R. Frants D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rune R. Frants sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A Unifying Genetic Model for Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

    Richard J. L. F. Lemmers;Patrick J. van der Vliet;Rinse Klooster;Sabrina Sacconi

  • Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHD-permissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2

    Richard J.L.F. Lemmers;Rabi Tawil;Lisa M. Petek;Judit Balog

  • Subunits of the translation initiation factor eIF2B are mutant in leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter.

    Peter A.J. Leegwater;Gerre Vermeulen;Andrea A.M. Könst;Sakkubai Naidu

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new susceptibility loci for migraine

    Verneri Anttila;Bendik S. Winsvold;Bendik S. Winsvold;Padhraig Gormley;Tobias Kurth

  • Hypomethylation of D4Z4 in 4q-linked and non-4q-linked facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

    Petra G M van Overveld;Richard J F L Lemmers;Lodewijk A Sandkuijl;Leo Enthoven

  • Nucleotide sequence of the partially deleted D4Z4 locus in a patient with FSHD identifies a putative gene within each 3.3 kb element.

    J. Gabriels;M.C. Beckers;H. Ding;A.S. de Vriese

  • Specific Loss of Histone H3 Lysine 9 Trimethylation and HP1γ/Cohesin Binding at D4Z4 Repeats Is Associated with Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy (FSHD)

    Weihua Zeng;Jessica C. De Greef;Yen Yun Chen;Richard Chien

  • Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is uniquely associated with one of the two variants of the 4q subtelomere.

    Richard J L F Lemmers;Peggy de Kievit;Lodewijk Sandkuijl;George W Padberg

  • The expression of type III hyperlipoproteinemia: involvement of lipolysis genes

    Peter Henneman;Femke Van Der Sman-De Beer;Payman Hanifi Moghaddam;Petra Huijts

  • Mutations of MLC1 (KIAA0027), Encoding a Putative Membrane Protein, Cause Megalencephalic Leukoencephalopathy with Subcortical Cysts

    Peter A.J. Leegwater;Bao Qiang Yuan;Jeffrey van der Steen;Joyce Mulders

  • Genetics of headaches.

    Arn M.J.M. Van Den Maagdenberg;Gisela M. Terwindt;Joost Haan;Rune R. Frants

  • Migraine and MTHFR C677T genotype in a population-based sample.

    Ann I Scher;Ann I Scher;Gisela M Terwindt;W M Monique Verschuren;Mark C Kruit

  • Specific sequence variations within the 4q35 region are associated with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

    Richard J.L.F. Lemmers;Mariëlle Wohlgemuth;Kristiaan J. van der Gaag;Patrick J. van der Vliet

  • Melanocortin-1 Receptor Variant R151C Modifies Melanoma Risk in Dutch Families with Melanoma

    Pieter A. van der Velden;Lodewijk A. Sandkuijl;Wilma Bergman;Stan Pavel

  • Common epigenetic changes of D4Z4 in contraction-dependent and contraction-independent FSHD.

    Jessica C. de Greef;Richard J.L.F. Lemmers;Baziel G.M. van Engelen;Sabrina Sacconi

  • Mutations in ZBTB24 are associated with immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome type 2

    Jessica C. de Greef;Jun Wang;Judit Balog;Johan T. den Dunnen

  • De novo facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: frequent somatic mosaicism, sex-dependent phenotype, and the role of mitotic transchromosomal repeat interaction between chromosomes 4 and 10.

    Silvère M. van der Maarel;Giancarlo Deidda;Richard J.L.F. Lemmers;Petra G.M. van Overveld

  • Clear detection of ADIPOQ locus as the major gene for plasma adiponectin: Results of genome-wide association analyses including 4659 European individuals

    Iris M. Heid;Peter Henneman;Andrew Hicks;Stefan Coassin

  • Contractions of D4Z4 on 4qB subtelomeres do not cause facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

    Richard J. F.L. Lemmers;Mariëlle Wohlgemuth;Rune R. Frants;George W. Padberg

  • Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

    Silvère M. van der Maarel;Rune R. Frants;George W. Padberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Silvère M. van der Maarel
Silvère M. van der Maarel Leiden University Medical Center
George W. Padberg
George W. Padberg Radboud University
Louis M. Havekes
Louis M. Havekes Leiden University Medical Center
Michel D. Ferrari
Michel D. Ferrari Leiden University Medical Center
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg Leiden University Medical Center
Marten H. Hofker
Marten H. Hofker University Medical Center Groningen
Ko Willems van Dijk
Ko Willems van Dijk Leiden University Medical Center
Lodewijk A. Sandkuijl
Lodewijk A. Sandkuijl Leiden University Medical Center
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen Leiden University Medical Center
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of academic and professional options, especially with the flexibility of online education. If you’re seeking a fast and practical entry point into healthcare, consider an online medical assisting school. These programs typically offer both foundational knowledge and direct patient care training, sometimes with financial aid options.

For those aiming to advance their careers, a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online provides a streamlined path from entry-level roles to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). This progression can mean increased responsibilities, higher earning potential, and more specialized roles in healthcare.

If your interests are rooted in research or a broader scientific scope, an online bachelor's degree in biology is a flexible way to gain critical skills for lab work, pharmaceuticals, teaching, or further graduate study.

Nursing remains a cornerstone career option for biology and biochemistry students. Accredited asn online nursing programs can help you become a registered nurse (RN) in a relatively short time, blending biology foundations with patient-focused practice.

Best Scientists Citing Rune R. Frants

Recently Published Articles