World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1565 750 166 13784

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rudolf Hoehn-Saric between 1964 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rudolf Hoehn-Saric published across 52 years, from 1964 to 2015, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1998. 1 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1998. 1964: 3 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 9 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication
1964 2015

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rudolf Hoehn-Saric: publications per year, 1964 to 2015
Year Publications
1964 3
1965 2
1966 2
1967 0
1968 2
1969 2
1970 1
1971 0
1972 2
1973 0
1974 4
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 3
1983 3
1984 0
1985 4
1986 1
1987 2
1988 3
1989 4
1990 3
1991 10
1992 3
1993 9
1994 7
1995 2
1996 7
1997 9
1998 12
1999 1
2000 9
2001 4
2002 4
2003 2
2004 5
2005 1
2006 9
2007 10
2008 7
2009 4
2010 0
2011 0
2012 2
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
Total 166
Download as CSV

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric publications per year - data summary

  • Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, has 166 publications recorded across 52 years, from 1964 to 2015.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1964 and the most recent to 2015.
  • The most productive year is 1998, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1970, 1978, 1979, 1980 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 10 of the 52 years in the span carry no publications at all (1967, 1971, 1973, 1975 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 42 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2011-2015) hold 3 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1964-1981: 25 publications (1.4 per year); 1982-1999: 83 publications (4.6 per year); 2000-2015: 58 publications (3.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf Hoehn-Saric sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 166
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, records 166 publications - the 50th percentile of the discipline.
  • 50% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, and about 50% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Rudolf Hoehn-Saric falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf Hoehn-Saric sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, records 59 D-Index - the 81st percentile of the discipline.
  • 81% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, and about 19% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Rudolf Hoehn-Saric ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, neuroscience, and psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to advancing scientific knowledge.

The scientist's publication record includes work on genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder research, and family and disability support research. These topics underscore a focus on complex interactions between genetic factors and neuropsychological development.

Recent publications by Rudolf Hoehn-Saric include the paper titled Arousal Modulation in Females with Fragile X or Turner Syndrome, published in 2020 in UNC Libraries. This work addresses biological and psychological responses in specific genetic conditions associated with neurodevelopmental effects.

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Jane E. Roberts
  • Michèle M. M. Mazzocco
  • Melissa M. Murphy

The scientist's work has appeared in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries

Rudolf Hoehn-Saric's main fields of study as reflected in their publications include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Their research subfields include:

  • Genetics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology

Main research topics covered by their work incorporate:

  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Family and Disability Support Research

Best Publications

  • A family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Gerald Nestadt;Jack Samuels;Mark Riddle;O. Joseph Bienvenu

  • The relationship of obsessive–compulsive disorder to possible spectrum disorders: results from a family study

    O. Joseph Bienvenu;Jack F. Samuels;Mark A. Riddle;Rudolf Hoehn-Saric

  • Target complaints as criteria of improvement.

    C C Battle;S D Imber;R Hoehn-Saric;E R Nash

  • Hoarding in obsessive compulsive disorder: Results from a case-control study

    J. Samuels;O. Joseph Bienvenu;M.A. Riddle;B.A.M. Cullen

  • Clomipramine in the treatment of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Joseph DeVeaugh-Geiss;Richard Katz;Phyllis Landau;Hagop Akiskal

  • Personality disorders and normal personality dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Samuels J;Nestadt G;Bienvenu Oj;Costa Pt

  • The relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder and anxiety and affective disorders: results from the Johns Hopkins OCD Family Study.

    G. Nestadt;J. Samuels;M. A. Riddle;K.-Y. Liang

  • SYSTEMATIC PREPARATION OF PATIENTS FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY. I. EFFECTS ON THERAPY BEHAVIOR AND OUTCOME.

    Rudolf Hoehn-Saric;Jerome D. Frank;Stanley D. Imber;Earl H. Nash

  • Anxiety and arousal: physiological changes and their perception

    Rudolf Hoehn-Saric;Daniel R. McLeod

  • Effects of Clonidine on Anxiety Disorders

    Rudolf Hoehn-Saric;Altaf F. Merchant;Mary L. Keyser;n Virginia K. Smith

  • Somatic symptoms and physiologic responses in generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder: an ambulatory monitor study.

    Rudolf Hoehn-Saric;Daniel R. McLeod;Frank Funderburk;Pamela Kowalski

  • Normal physiological emotions but differences in expression of conscious feelings in children with high-functioning autism.

    D. Ben Shalom;S. H. Mostofsky;S. H. Mostofsky;R. L. Hazlett;M. C. Goldberg;M. C. Goldberg

  • Hoarding in obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study.

    Jack F. Samuels;O. Joseph Bienvenu;Anthony Pinto;Abby J. Fyer

  • Somatic Manifestations in Women With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Psychophysiological Responses to Psychological Stress

    Rudolf Hoehn-Saric;Daniel R. McLeod;Wesley D. Zimmerli

  • The familial phenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder in relation to tic disorders: the Hopkins OCD family study.

    Marco A. Grados;Marco A. Grados;Mark A. Riddle;Mark A. Riddle;Jack F. Samuels;Kung Yee Liang

  • The peripheral sympathetic nervous system. Its role in normal and pathologic anxiety.

    Rudolf Hoehn-Saric;Daniel R. McLeod

  • Elevated medial-frontal cerebral blood flow in obsessive-compulsive patients: a SPECT study.

    Steven R. Machlin;Gordon J. Harris;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Rudolf Hoehn-Saric

  • Sapap3 and pathological grooming in humans: Results from the OCD collaborative genetics study.

    O. J. Bienvenu;Y. Wang;Y. Y. Shugart;J. M. Welch

  • Significant linkage to compulsive hoarding on chromosome 14 in families with obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study.

    Jack Samuels;Yin Yao Shugart;Marco A Grados;Virginia L Willour

  • Replication Study Supports Evidence for Linkage to 9p24 in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Virginia L. Willour;Yin Yao Shugart;Jack Samuels;Marco Grados;Marco Grados

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald Nestadt
Gerald Nestadt Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Mark A. Riddle
Mark A. Riddle Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Yin Yao Shugart
Yin Yao Shugart National Institutes of Health
Benjamin D. Greenberg
Benjamin D. Greenberg Brown University
Steven A. Rasmussen
Steven A. Rasmussen Brown University
Scott L. Rauch
Scott L. Rauch McLean Hospital
Abby J. Fyer
Abby J. Fyer Columbia University
James T. McCracken
James T. McCracken University of California, Los Angeles
John Piacentini
John Piacentini University of California, Los Angeles
David L. Pauls
David L. Pauls Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a range of flexible and accessible online degree options. Many students are now choosing online master programs to fast-track their expertise and enter specialized fields in less time. For those seeking a quicker start, you can also find an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited, allowing you to complete undergraduate studies at a much faster pace.

Cost is often a major concern, especially for students pursuing advanced degrees. There are several cheap msw programs online that offer quality education without a steep price tag, making a career in social work more attainable. Likewise, those aiming for specialized credentials can explore bcba master's programs online, which provide affordable options for those interested in applied behavior analysis.

Choosing the right online program involves balancing your career goals, budget, and time commitment. With the growing number of accredited and affordable online degrees, more students are finding flexible pathways to rewarding careers in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Rudolf Hoehn-Saric

Recently Published Articles