World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Riitta L. Keiski

Riitta L. Keiski

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 51 3878 25 262 9533

Riitta L. Keiski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Riitta L. Keiski between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Riitta L. Keiski published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2013. 3 of the 294 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2013. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1984 2025

294 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Riitta L. Keiski: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 3
2003 2
2004 11
2005 8
2006 10
2007 15
2008 9
2009 20
2010 13
2011 25
2012 13
2013 28
2014 10
2015 19
2016 18
2017 17
2018 15
2019 6
2020 11
2021 11
2022 9
2023 4
2024 0
2025 3
Total 294
Download as CSV

Riitta L. Keiski publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Riitta L. Keiski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 262 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240 262
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Riitta L. Keiski D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Riitta L. Keiski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253 51
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Riitta L. Keiski was affiliated with the University of Oulu in Finland. Their research primarily focused on materials science and engineering, with particular attention to topics within materials chemistry, mechanical engineering, catalysis, biomedical engineering, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist's work covered a range of main topics including catalytic processes in materials science, catalysis and oxidation reactions, supercapacitor materials and fabrication, adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal, catalysis and hydrodesulfurization studies, catalysis for biomass conversion, and mesoporous materials and catalysis.

Several frequent coauthors collaborated with Riitta L. Keiski. These included:

  • Satu Pitkäaho
  • Satu Ojala
  • Lenka Matějová
  • Prem Kumar Seelam
  • Mónica M. Gómez

Notable publication venues where Riitta L. Keiski's research appeared include:

  • Journal of environmental chemical engineering
  • Resources
  • Molecules
  • Waste and Biomass Valorization
  • Nanomaterials

Their recent publications included the following papers:

  • Evaluation and selection of biochars and hydrochars derived from agricultural wastes for the use as adsorbent and energy storage materials, 2021, Journal of environmental chemical engineering
  • Risk management for arsenic in agricultural soil-water systems: lessons learned from case studies in Europe, 2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • End-of-Use vs. End-of-Life: When Do Consumer Electronics Become Waste?, 2022, Resources
  • Modified geopolymers as promising catalyst supports for abatement of dichloromethane, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Sustainability assessment of products - Case study of wind turbine generator types, 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Best Publications

  • Challenges in biobutanol production: How to improve the efficiency?

    Verónica García;Johanna Päkkilä;Heikki Ojamo;Esa Muurinen

  • The effect of NO2 on the activity of fresh and aged zeolite catalysts in the NH3-SCR reaction

    Katariina Rahkamaa-Tolonen;Teuvo Maunula;Mari Lomma;Mika Huuhtanen

  • Recycling and substitution of light rare earth elements, cerium, lanthanum, neodymium, and praseodymium from end-of-life applications - A review

    Linda Omodara;Satu Pitkäaho;Esa-Matti Turpeinen;Paula Saavalainen

  • Electronic waste recovery in Finland: Consumers' perceptions towards recycling and re-use of mobile phones.

    Jenni Ylä-Mella;Riitta Liisa Keiski;Eva Pongrácz

  • Catalysis in VOC Abatement

    Satu Ojala;Satu Pitkäaho;Tiina Laitinen;Niina Niskala Koivikko

  • The removal of zinc from synthetic wastewaters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: statistical design of experiments

    Junkal Landaburu-Aguirre;Verónica García;Eva Pongrácz;Riitta L. Keiski

  • Direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate with supercritical carbon dioxide: Characterization of a key organotin oxide intermediate

    Danielle Ballivet-Tkatchenko;Stéphane Chambrey;Riitta Keiski;Rosane Ligabue

  • Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the removal of cadmium and zinc: Use of response surface methodology to improve understanding of process performance and optimisation.

    Junkal Landaburu-Aguirre;Eva Pongrácz;Paavo Perämäki;Riitta L. Keiski

  • Catalytic activation of CO2: Use of secondary CO2 for the production of synthesis gas and for methanol synthesis over copper-based zirconia-containing catalysts

    R. Raudaskoski;E. Turpeinen;R. Lenkkeri;E. Pongrácz

  • Nitrogen-Doped Anatase Nanofibers Decorated with Noble Metal Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Production of Hydrogen

    Ming-Chung Wu;Jussi Tapio Hiltunen;András Sápi;Anna Avila

  • Apparent and intrinsic properties of commercial PDMS based membranes in pervaporative removal of acetone, butanol and ethanol from binary aqueous mixtures

    Anna Rozicka;Johanna Niemistö;Riitta L. Keiski;Wojciech Kujawski

  • Stationary and transient kinetics of the high temperature water-gas shift reaction

    Riitta L. Keiski;Tapio Salmi;Pekka Niemistö;Jorma Ainassaari

  • Pervaporation performance of composite poly(dimethyl siloxane) membrane for butanol recovery from model solutions

    Johanna Niemistö;Wojciech Kujawski;Riitta L. Keiski

  • Production of Activated Carbon from Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) Pod Husk

    Gerardo Cruz;Minna Pirilä;Mika Huuhtanen;Lili Carrión

  • Crystallization fouling of CaCO3 – Analysis of experimental thermal resistance and its uncertainty

    T.M. Pääkkönen;T.M. Pääkkönen;M. Riihimäki;C.J. Simonson;E. Muurinen

  • The effect of ageing time on co-precipitated Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts used in methanol synthesis from CO2 and H2

    Riitta Raudaskoski;Marita Veringa Niemelä;Riitta L. Keiski

  • Toward new benchmark adsorbents: preparation and characterization of activated carbon from argan nut shell for bisphenol A removal

    Mohamed Zbair;Kaisu Ainassaari;Asmaa Drif;Satu Ojala

  • Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanofibers and their flexible composite films: Decomposition of organic dyes and efficient H2 generation from ethanol-water mixtures

    Ming Chung Wu;Ming Chung Wu;András Sápi;Anna Avila;Mária Szabó

  • The oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over molybdenum-vanadium-niobium oxide catalysts: the role of catalyst composition

    O. Desponds;R. L. Keiski;G. A. Somorjai

  • Kinetics of the water-gas shift reaction over several alkane activation and water-gas shift catalysts

    R.L. Keiski;O. Desponds;Y.-F. Chang;G.A. Somorjai

  • Concentration of ammonium and nitrate from mine water by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration

    Katri Häyrynen;Katri Häyrynen;Eva Pongrácz;Virpi Väisänen;Nora Pap

  • Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater

    Minna Pirilä;Mohammed Saouabe;Satu Ojala;Buddhika Rathnayake

  • Production of Activated Carbon from Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) Pod Husk

    Gerardo Cruz;Minna Pirila;Mika Huuhtanen;Lili Carrión Peña

Frequent Co-Authors

Jyri-Pekka Mikkola
Jyri-Pekka Mikkola Umeå University
Tapio Salmi
Tapio Salmi Åbo Akademi University
Ganapati D. Yadav
Ganapati D. Yadav Institute of Chemical Technology
Carey J. Simonson
Carey J. Simonson University of Saskatchewan
Ákos Kukovecz
Ákos Kukovecz University of Szeged
Zoltán Kónya
Zoltán Kónya University of Szeged
Ming-Chung Wu
Ming-Chung Wu Chang Gung University
Adolfo Iulianelli
Adolfo Iulianelli National Research Council (CNR)
Angelo Basile
Angelo Basile National Research Council (CNR)
Hua Jiang
Hua Jiang Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology can open doors to a diverse range of online academic and career opportunities. Many students consider supplementing their technical background with additional credentials to enhance their job prospects and broaden their expertise.

For those interested in law and regulations that affect the tech sector, exploring cheapest aba-approved paralegal programs can be a smart choice. Others may look to advance into management by enrolling in the cheapest online masters in human resources for leadership roles within tech-driven organizations.

Strong communication skills are vital in today’s engineering projects, making an online masters in communication an excellent complement to a technical degree. Future entrepreneurs in the tech field might also be interested in the best online mba in entrepreneurship to help turn new technologies into successful businesses.

Pairing engineering and technology studies with specialized online programs can help students and professionals unlock new career pathways and maximize their potential in a rapidly evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Riitta L. Keiski

Recently Published Articles