| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 32 | 3097 | 2765 | 1237 | 1035 | 101 | 11059 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Richard W. Cottle between 1963 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard W. Cottle published across 56 years, from 1963 to 2018, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 17 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.
132 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 1 |
| 1964 | 2 |
| 1965 | 4 |
| 1966 | 1 |
| 1967 | 4 |
| 1968 | 1 |
| 1969 | 1 |
| 1970 | 2 |
| 1971 | 1 |
| 1972 | 6 |
| 1973 | 3 |
| 1974 | 6 |
| 1975 | 4 |
| 1976 | 4 |
| 1977 | 3 |
| 1978 | 3 |
| 1979 | 5 |
| 1980 | 5 |
| 1981 | 2 |
| 1982 | 4 |
| 1983 | 1 |
| 1984 | 2 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 0 |
| 1989 | 3 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 1 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 3 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1 |
| 2015 | 3 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| 2017 | 16 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| Total | 132 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Cottle sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 101 publications — 11th percentile
11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 42–46 | 3 | |
| 47–51 | 5 | |
| 52–56 | 7 | |
| 57–61 | 20 | |
| 62–66 | 14 | |
| 67–71 | 25 | |
| 72–76 | 19 | |
| 77–81 | 35 | |
| 82–86 | 50 | |
| 87–91 | 60 | |
| 92–96 | 86 | |
| 97–101 | 84 | 101 |
| 102–106 | 83 | |
| 107–111 | 90 | |
| 112–116 | 99 | |
| 117–121 | 90 | |
| 122–126 | 91 | |
| 127–131 | 109 | |
| 132–136 | 110 | |
| 137–141 | 98 | |
| 142–146 | 112 | |
| 147–151 | 102 | |
| 152–156 | 88 | |
| 157–161 | 106 | |
| 162–166 | 83 | |
| 167–171 | 102 | |
| 172–176 | 77 | |
| 177–181 | 81 | |
| 182–186 | 78 | |
| 187–191 | 71 | |
| 192–196 | 92 | |
| 197–201 | 64 | |
| 202–206 | 69 | |
| 207–211 | 64 | |
| 212–216 | 62 | |
| 217–221 | 58 | |
| 222–226 | 53 | |
| 227–231 | 50 | |
| 232–236 | 46 | |
| 237–241 | 46 | |
| 242–246 | 46 | |
| 247–251 | 43 | |
| 252–256 | 29 | |
| 257–261 | 45 | |
| 262–266 | 30 | |
| 267–271 | 33 | |
| 272–276 | 34 | |
| 277–281 | 30 | |
| 282–286 | 31 | |
| 287–291 | 21 | |
| 292–296 | 34 | |
| 297–301 | 26 | |
| 302–306 | 10 | |
| 307–311 | 17 | |
| 312–316 | 23 | |
| 317–321 | 13 | |
| 322–326 | 16 | |
| 327–331 | 26 | |
| 332–336 | 13 | |
| 337–341 | 13 | |
| 342–346 | 16 | |
| 347–351 | 17 | |
| 352–356 | 12 | |
| 357–361 | 18 | |
| 362–366 | 18 | |
| 367–371 | 9 | |
| 372–376 | 11 | |
| 377–381 | 8 | |
| 382–386 | 8 | |
| 387–391 | 9 | |
| 392–396 | 9 | |
| 397–401 | 8 | |
| 402–406 | 11 | |
| 407–411 | 6 | |
| 412–416 | 6 | |
| 417–421 | 9 | |
| 422–426 | 8 | |
| 427–431 | 5 | |
| 432–436 | 8 | |
| 437–441 | 8 | |
| 442–446 | 4 | |
| 447–451 | 4 | |
| 452–456 | 4 | |
| 457–461 | 2 | |
| 462–466 | 2 | |
| 467–471 | 4 | |
| 472–476 | 3 | |
| 477–481 | 3 | |
| 482–486 | 6 | |
| 487–491 | 3 | |
| 492–496 | 5 | |
| 497–501 | 5 | |
| 502–506 | 1 | |
| 507–511 | 6 | |
| 512–516 | 4 | |
| 517–521 | 1 | |
| 522–526 | 3 | |
| 527–531 | 1 | |
| 532–536 | 4 | |
| 537+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Cottle sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile
14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 174 | |
| 31 | 151 | |
| 32 | 174 | 32 |
| 33 | 117 | |
| 34 | 136 | |
| 35 | 127 | |
| 36 | 145 | |
| 37 | 153 | |
| 38 | 150 | |
| 39 | 150 | |
| 40 | 138 | |
| 41 | 136 | |
| 42 | 93 | |
| 43 | 108 | |
| 44 | 115 | |
| 45 | 112 | |
| 46 | 103 | |
| 47 | 75 | |
| 48 | 59 | |
| 49 | 67 | |
| 50 | 60 | |
| 51 | 57 | |
| 52 | 59 | |
| 53 | 62 | |
| 54 | 60 | |
| 55 | 50 | |
| 56 | 42 | |
| 57 | 54 | |
| 58 | 50 | |
| 59 | 42 | |
| 60 | 41 | |
| 61 | 35 | |
| 62 | 40 | |
| 63 | 21 | |
| 64 | 31 | |
| 65 | 27 | |
| 66 | 29 | |
| 67 | 19 | |
| 68 | 25 | |
| 69 | 17 | |
| 70 | 18 | |
| 71 | 12 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 13 | |
| 74 | 18 | |
| 75 | 9 | |
| 76 | 11 | |
| 77 | 10 | |
| 78 | 9 | |
| 79 | 16 | |
| 80 | 12 | |
| 81 | 10 | |
| 82 | 5 | |
| 83 | 5 | |
| 84 | 13 | |
| 85 | 6 | |
| 86+ | 99 |
Richard W. Cottle;Jong-Shi Pang;Richard E. Stone
Unknown
Richard W. Cottle;George B. Dantzig
Unknown
Richard W. Cottle
R. W. Cottle;J. C. Yao
George Dantzig;E. Eisenberg;Richard Cottle
Richard W. Cottle;George B. Dantzig
R.W. Cottle;J.-S. Pang;V. Venkateswaran
Richard W. Cottle;Arthur F. Veinott
Richard W Cottle
R.W. Cottle;G.J. Habetler;C.E. Lemke
Richard W. Cottle
Richard W. Cottle;Che-Lin Su
Richard W. Cottle;Richard W. Cottle;Gene H. Golub;Gene H. Golub;Richard S. Sacher;Richard S. Sacher
Richard W. Cottle;Jong-Shi Pang
Richard W. Cottle;Steven G. Duvall;Karel Zikan
Richard W. Cottle;Richard S. Sacher
Richard W. Cottle;Jacques A. Ferland
Unknown
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Mathematics in the USA opens doors not only to traditional math careers but also to interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students complement their math background with business-oriented programs, which can enhance their analytical and leadership skills.
For those interested in leadership roles, discovering what mba programs can i get into is a great start. This resource highlights accessible MBA options that balance quality with admissions ease.
Time-conscious students might prefer easiest and fastest online mba programs, which allow for quick completion without sacrificing essential business knowledge — a smart choice for math graduates aiming to diversify their skill set.
For those aiming for advanced executive education, understanding the market for the cheapest aacsb online dba can provide valuable insights into affordable and credible doctoral business programs.
Finally, combining math with finance is a natural career pathway. Prospective students should explore options for a master of finance online, blending quantitative skills with financial expertise to excel in roles like financial analyst or quantitative trader.
